[ncdnhc-discuss] Raul will be our Structure representative

[Chun Eung Hwi]

Dear Vany,

Quick question! When do you think those agenda and timeline will be voted?


Chun Eung Hwi

> About adding subjects in the NCDNHC agenda, I think that all members has
> the right to propose items to be discussed in the agenda of the NCDNHC. 
> Actually I sent to the list a proposal of agenda and schedules, where I
> included your request.  Also all members are invited to comment and make
> contributions towards the agenda and schedules proposed.  
> 
> Best Regards
> Vany
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Chun Eung Hwi wrote:
> > 
> > Dear Vany,
> > 
> > I cannot understand why you cannot understand what I mean.
> > I don't want to repeat this again later.
> > 
> > > The are rules already setted up within the Names Council regarding
> > > composition of Task Forces, Committess and Working Groups. When I was
> > > talking about Phillip answer, I wanted to mean
> > > that since the rules of the specific Task Force on Structure indicates
> > > that only one per constituency will be allowed
> > > to participate, then it is logical to think that it won't be allowed two
> > > representatives from the NCDNHC even in a non-voting status.
> > 
> > It is the comment period for ToR. Therefore, now the suggested ToR could
> > be changed because it is not a finalized one. According to rules of
> > procedure for DNSO, any TF should have at least one participant from all
> > constituencies but it doesn't exclude the possibility of allowing two or
> > more participants from costituencies in TF. Refer to the marked part of
> > the sentence.
> > 
> > c) Task Force - a group equally representative of each NC constituency
> > (typically one from each) and typically charged with forming a
> >  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > recommendation to the NC or implementing an agreed NC action plan.
> > (http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20010711.NCprocedures-v3.0.html)
> > 
> > > I think that actually the NCDNHC hasn't developed yet an official
> > > position regarding Task Forces, Committess and Working Groups.  If it is
> > > wanted to develop such positions, I propose that we discuss it in the
> > > list the proposals that may you
> > > and Adam have to tell to the NCDNHC members, and vote on them.  After
> > > such voting, the NCDNHC Names Council members are
> > > able to expose such motion in the Names Council.
> > > Do we also place in the agenda discussion about Task Forces, Committees
> > > and Working Groups?
> > 
> > It could be done if you want to do that. As for me, I think that NCDNHC is
> > not a poll research center.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Chun Eung Hwi
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > Chun Eung Hwi
> > General Secretary, PeaceNet | phone:     (+82) 2- 583-3033
> > Seoul Yangchun P.O.Box 81   |   pcs:     (+82) 019-259-2667
> > Seoul, 158-600, Korea       | eMail:   ehchun at peacenet.or.kr
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Discuss mailing list
> > Discuss at icann-ncc.org
> > http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> 
> -- 
> Nilda Vany Martinez Grajales, BSEE
> Information Technology Specialist
> Sustainable Development Networking Programme/Panama
> Member of the ICANN's DNSO Non-Commercial Constituency
> Tel: (507) 317-0169
> http://www.sdnp.org.pa
> e-mail:  vany at sdnp.org.pa
> 
> Are you a Non-Commercial organization and have a domain name?
> Join the ICANN's DNSO Non-Commercial Constituency, ncdnhc.icann-ncc.org
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at icann-ncc.org
> http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>