[ncdnhc-discuss] Raul will be our Structure representative

[Nilda Vany Martinez Grajales]

Hi Chun:

I just wanted to be informative of the actual ToR of the TF on
Structure, and that due to such ToR, another person, in my understanding
of such ToRs (lets wait Philip Sheppard answer), only one person per
constituency can compose the TF.  However, the mailing list of the TF on
Structure is public so I don't see any obstacle for any individual
(perhaps you, I, any other member) that wants to colaborate to go and
read the mailing list 
and then make all contributions in our discussion list.

Of course, that the issue of TF vs WG  we can discuss in general if you
want to bring the issue to the NCDNHC and even make resolutions about it
to be delivered to the NC.

Best Regards
Vany


Chun Eung Hwi wrote:
> 
> Dear Vany and others,
> 
> On Sun, 25 Nov 2001, Nilda Vany Martinez Grajales wrote:
> 
> > The actual ToR of NC TF on Structure (which is now under comments period
> > by the members of this TF) you can find them in:
> >
> > http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/nc-str/Arc00/
> >
> > I propose that all those NCDNHC members that want to contribute with the
> > work of TF on Structure, read the mailing list through the web, which
> > is public at http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/nc-str/Arc00/  and discuss
> > any contribution to be made through NCDNHC discussion list.
> 
> Vany, what you are proposing? Regardless of your proposal, it has already
> worked in that way.
> 
> In reading your writing, I thought one additional comment on the present
> ToR of Structure TF. As Adam Peake and some others raised up before, the
> present NC Task Force vs. Working Group should be discussed in terms of
> "the efficacy of policy making within the DNSO". The present ToR shows up
> that the efficacy of policy making should be reviewed only in the possible
> new relations among future Supporting Organizations. However, regarding
> "the efficacy of policy making within the DNSO", Working Group is much
> more important. In last DNSO Review discussions, it had been repeatedly
> confirmed. Nevertheless, the present ToR is losing it. Concretely, if WG
> could be a indispensable requirement for all SOs for making more bottom-up
> consensus, the efficacy of policy making could be achieved.
> 
> In my view, the fundamental reason bearing useless time consuming for our
> debate on selecting representative in TF of NC is the relatively closed TF
> pattern of policy making procedure. In fact, this topic of Structure
> should have been discussed in a form of WG rather than TF. In that
> respect, Names Council is avoiding WG formation. Therefore, NCDNHC should
> argue more open discussion structure rather than repeatedly proposing more
> closed pattern of discussion that has already been set up and working
> within Names Council.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Chun Eung Hwi
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Chun Eung Hwi
> General Secretary, PeaceNet | phone:     (+82) 2- 583-3033
> Seoul Yangchun P.O.Box 81   |   pcs:     (+82) 019-259-2667
> Seoul, 158-600, Korea       | eMail:   ehchun at peacenet.or.kr
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at icann-ncc.org
> http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

-- 
Nilda Vany Martinez Grajales, BSEE
Information Technology Specialist
Sustainable Development Networking Programme/Panama
Member of the ICANN's DNSO Non-Commercial Constituency
Tel: (507) 317-0169
http://www.sdnp.org.pa
e-mail:  vany at sdnp.org.pa

Are you a Non-Commercial organization and have a domain name?
Join the ICANN's DNSO Non-Commercial Constituency, ncdnhc.icann-ncc.org