[ncdnhc-discuss] FYI
Dave Crocker
dhc2 at dcrocker.net
Sun Nov 25 08:22:27 CET 2001
At 08:05 AM 11/25/2001 +0100, Dany Vandromme wrote:
>1) Do not misrepresent the situation: I challenged you from the time I
Kent did not say anything about timing, so there is no misrepresentation
about your choice of timing.
>knew that you are a voting member of the BC (on behalf of Songbird).
>Same applies for FRAX for the same reason.
>
>2) This challenge is not related to any exchange you may have with Milton.
Kent's statement about vendetta was about Milton. He did not mention you,
so that is another item that has not been misrepresented by Kent.
>3) This is a contituency problem, not to be arbitrated by ICANN staff.
>The constituency is supposed to self-organize. Let's do it!
Evidently you are unaware that DNSO constituencies derive from ICANN and
the DNSO and have accountability to then. Perhaps you should read the
relevant documents such as the ICANN bylaws.
So, Dany, yes it would be quite good to be clear. As a small beginning,
please do not accuse others of creating misrepresentations. Your own
accusation contained plenty of misrepresentation on its own.
d/
----------
Dave Crocker <mailto:dcrocker at brandenburg.com>
Brandenburg InternetWorking <http://www.brandenburg.com>
tel +1.408.246.8253; fax +1.408.273.6464
More information about the Ncuc-discuss
mailing list