[ncdnhc-discuss] FYI

Dave Crocker dhc2 at dcrocker.net
Sun Nov 25 08:22:27 CET 2001


At 08:05 AM 11/25/2001 +0100, Dany Vandromme wrote:
>1) Do not misrepresent the situation: I challenged you from the time I

Kent did not say anything about timing, so there is no misrepresentation 
about your choice of timing.


>knew that you are a voting member of the BC (on behalf of Songbird).
>Same applies for FRAX for the same reason.
>
>2) This challenge is not related to any exchange you may have with Milton.

Kent's statement about vendetta was about Milton.  He did not mention you, 
so that is another item that has not been misrepresented by Kent.


>3) This is a contituency problem, not to be arbitrated by ICANN staff.
>The constituency is supposed to self-organize. Let's do it!

Evidently you are unaware that DNSO constituencies derive from ICANN and 
the DNSO and have accountability to then.  Perhaps you should read the 
relevant documents such as the ICANN bylaws.

So, Dany, yes it would be quite good to be clear.  As a small beginning, 
please do not accuse others of creating misrepresentations.  Your own 
accusation contained plenty of misrepresentation on its own.

d/


----------
Dave Crocker  <mailto:dcrocker at brandenburg.com>
Brandenburg InternetWorking  <http://www.brandenburg.com>
tel +1.408.246.8253;  fax +1.408.273.6464




More information about the Ncuc-discuss mailing list