[ncdnhc-discuss] FRAX admission to Membership

[Adam Peake]

As far as I'm concerned our procedures are logically clear.  If FRAX 
wants to be a voting member of the NCC it must replace Jefsey Morfin 
as representative so long as he is the representative (and person 
holding a vote) in another constituency.  Same for the yacht club and 
Kent.

Both of course very welcome on the NCC discuss list whether they are 
representatives of a member organizations or not.

Dave Crocker clearly has no similar conflict and should remain 
representative of SVPA.  If Milton has any sense he'd apologize.

Adam

Adam Peake
GLOCOM Tokyo


>Jefsey Morfin wrote:
>  >
>>  Dear NCDNHC Members,
>>
>>  On 16:52 05/11/01, Alejandro Pisanty - CUAED y FQ, UNAM said:
>>  >There was no reason to prescribe to SVPAL the way they should be
>>  >represented, and the discussion on that specific point was not brought to
>>  >the constituency list in the accustomed way (since as Dave has pointed out
>>  >the AdCom still has a pending task in establishing fundamental stuff in
>>  >the bylaws).
>>
>>  Considering this post and the posts from Mr. Kent Crispin a Member of the
>>  BC and the representative of the voting Member Poter Yacht Club, and from
>>  Mr. Dave Cocker representative of  the voting Member SVPAL and a consultant
>>  of the Top Management of NeuStar a business having been awarded the ".us"
>>  TLD Management, I submit that the NCDNHC has no reason to prescribe to the
>>  Frax the way they should be represented.
>>
>>  So I ask Mr. Ken Crispin, Dave Cocker and Alejandro Pisanty to set their
>>  acts in accordance with their positions at to support the Frax admission to
>>  NCDNHC Membership with full voting rights and my legal representation of it
>>  as per the French law on Publication Directorship and legal responsibility,
>>  however I am a consultant like Mr. Crocker and that my firm UTEL is a
>>  Member of the BC as Mr. Crispin's Songbird Inc.
>>
>>  I also call every Member to support that admission to Membership, being in
>>  agreement or not with the positions of Mr. Alejandro Pisanty, of Mr. Kent
>>  Crispin and of Mr. Dave Crocker, yet thinking that a same situation must be
>>  addressed in the same way who ever is concerned because no one is more
>>  equal than any other one within the ICANN organizations.
>>
>>  I add that I agree that the Frax be submitted further on to the same
>>  treatment as the Poter Yacht Club and the SVPAL should the NCDHNC take some
>>  ruling on the matter.
>>
>>  To avoid a long mails I do not copy once again the submission of the Frax
>>  that Members now probably know by core.
>>
>>  Jean-François C. (Jefsey) MORFIN
>>  Chair, Frax (Secretariat St. François Xavier)
>  >
>  > _______________________________________________
>  > Discuss mailing list
>  > Discuss at icann-ncc.org
>  > http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>-
>The FRAX application situation wrt NCDNHC is unchanged
>The voting/non voting right situation of kent Crispin Potter Yachter) is
>still pending for the clarification from Kent. This may remain pending
>as long as no vote is organized by the constituency.
>If such clarification is not provided by Kent by the time of the next
>NCDNHC meeting, I will ask the Adcom to consider him as a non-voting
>member at the meeting.
>Dany
>--
>-------------------------------------------------------------------
>Dany VANDROMME                    |  Directeur du GIP RENATER
>
>                 Reseau National de Telecommunications
>          pour la Technologie, l'Enseignement et la Recherche
>
>                                   |  ENSAM
>Tel   :  +33 (0)1 53 94 20 30     |  151 Boulevard de l'Hopital
>Fax   :  +33 (0)1 53 94 20 31     |  75013 Paris
>E-mail: Dany.Vandromme at renater.fr |  FRANCE
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>_______________________________________________
>Discuss mailing list
>Discuss at icann-ncc.org
>http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss