[ncdnhc-discuss] About Marketing Practices in .ORG

Jefsey Morfin jefsey at wanadoo.fr
Sat Dec 29 15:00:06 CET 2001


On 06:11 28/12/01, Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law said:
>I agree with Milton on this issue.

I support Milton too and object to Louis Touton's "USSR" artificial 
obligations.
Jefsey


>On Thu, 27 Dec 2001, Nilda Vany Martinez Grajales wrote:
>
> > Milton:
> >
> > I will follow the wishes of the constituency as a whole, and not the
> > wishes of four persons only.
> > Online vote has to take place and to be more specific, I think the vote
> > should take place by
> > giving to the membership the freedom to select between all posibilities
> > (UU, UR, SU, SR).
> >
> > And, as far as I know, there's no official support yet from this
> > constituency for
> > Unesponsored Unrestricted.
> >
> > If the NCDNHC will propose Unesponsored Unrestricted, then the NCDNHC
> > stake in .ORG is
> > just for civic reasons and not for any interest in finally protect and
> > watch the interests of
> > Non-Commercial sector regarding Domain Names.   Our missions commands us
> > to watch such interests and
> > finally it is given to the NCDNHC the opportunity to defend, to watch,
> > to promote such interests inside a TLD
> > and you want to let such opportunity go away from the constituency.  You
> > are not honoring the NCDNHC charter
> > and by you proposing for .ORG to be in first place Unrestricted is one
> > of your ways to simply
> > not complying with the NCDNHC charter.
> >
> > Best Regards
> > Vany
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Milton Mueller wrote:
> > >
> > > Vany:
> > > This distinction between old and new registrations
> > > is a lot more complicated that you make it seem.
> > >
> > > It is clear from our meetings that the constituency
> > > as a whole supports "unrestricted" ORG. We've
> > > had a long debate and votes on the subject.
> > >
> > > Because it is difficult if not impossible to
> > > make ORG a sponsored domain without also restricting
> > > it, I favor a unsposnored, unrestricted model,
> > > and that is what most other members have indicated
> > > to me.
> > >
> > > Please follow the wishes of the constituency.
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Discuss mailing list
> > > Discuss at icann-ncc.org
> > > http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >
> >
>
>--
>                 Please visit http://www.icannwatch.org
>A. Michael Froomkin   |    Professor of Law    |   froomkin at law.tm
>U. Miami School of Law, P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
>+1 (305) 284-4285  |  +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax)  |  http://www.law.tm
>                         -->It's warm here.<--
>
>_______________________________________________
>Discuss mailing list
>Discuss at icann-ncc.org
>http://www.icann-ncc.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss




More information about the Ncuc-discuss mailing list