[ncdnhc-discuss] Re: [bwg-core] IMPORTANT: Need guidance from you regarding .org
Jefsey Morfin
jefsey at wanadoo.fr
Sun Dec 16 07:50:20 CET 2001
On 02:32 17/12/01, Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law said:
>I haven't been following along. Where do those $ numbers come from?
>
> > - NSI M$ 4.75 or more
> > - Staff M$ 4.75
> > - .org M$.25 - M$ 1.5 operation costs over 10 years
> >
The agreement over the Plan B was that when releasing ".org", NSI would
help in transferring M$ 5 to the new TLD Manager. Mike Roberts has floated
a motion to be voted by the NC - you know that Mike sometimes has some
influence - where the "whereas" explained that this money was to be managed
by the ICANN and as among others proposed $ 250.000 to be transferred to
the future TLD Manager to help the set-up costs and negotiation with ICANN.
This motion does not give any other indication one the remaining M$ 4.75
some evaluate as a cost compensation for the Staff negotiating Plan B.
At the time of the PLAN B negotiation NSI ran a pre-renewal campaign at
discounted rates for period extending to 10 years. They never released any
figure yet to my knowledge nor indicated how many of the renewalers where
businesses (increasing dramatically the cost of a grandfathering as there
is a difference in compensation between not renewing and buying back).
Let assume that average renewalers chose a 5 years option. Let assume that
NSI got only $ 10 a year. This makes an average $ 50 per renewal. Let
assume that 100.000 took advantage from it. This makes M$ 5. Let assume
that the real operating cost is $ 3 per year. This means that .org TLD
Manager will have to provide a M$ 1.5 operations equivalent for free.
Obviously I may be wrong with these guessed figures. This is simple to
correct: just to publish the real figures.
Jefsey
More information about the Ncuc-discuss
mailing list