[ncdnhc-discuss] ICANN committee recommends voting restrictions,fewerAt-Large di rectors

[Adam Peake]

>
>>2. would you proclaim dead the present stage of discussion about .org,
>>or do you as NC member, or our other reps and AdCom members,
>>propose to move it on somehow?
>
>Dead? Are you joking? ORG divestiture is now in a Names Council Task
>Force (TF), chaired by me. The constituency has indicated where it
>stands on that issue; when the TF does something I will pass it
>to the constituency for comment. Expect a public comment period
>on the issues after Montevideo.


Do you think you could kill this closed task force process and start 
an open working group?

The Names Council has a taken an enormous step backwards in its 
obsession with these private task force groups.  What happened to the 
results of Working Group D?

Thanks,

Adam