[ncdnhc-discuss] ICANN committee recommends voting restrictions,fewer At-Large di rectors

[Dany Vandromme]

Adam Peake wrote:
> 
> Let's be careful here.
> 
> Members present in Yokohama voted for the resolution.  Did we hold an
> online vote of the constituency after Yokohama?  Even if we did hold
> an online vote (really, did we?) the result can be a position of the
> constituency without being consensus.
> 
> Note, I am in favor of the nine/nine division, I voted as such in
> Yokohama, I just don't want to hear a repeat of the post Yokohama
> discussion on our internal process: please!
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Adam
-
I my memory is correct, the principle of on-line approval of f2f
resolutions was set-up after Yokohama, in fact after the November 2000
Marine del Rey meeting.
Dany

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Dany VANDROMME                    |  Directeur du GIP RENATER

                Reseau National de Telecommunications
         pour la Technologie, l'Enseignement et la Recherche

                                  |  ENSAM
Tel   :  +33 (0)1 53 94 20 30     |  151 Boulevard de l'Hopital
Fax   :  +33 (0)1 53 94 20 31     |  75013 Paris
E-mail: Dany.Vandromme at renater.fr |  FRANCE
--------------------------------------------------------------------