[Membership-affairs] Dismal survey response rates
Stefania.Milan at EUI.eu
Thu Mar 12 17:12:38 CET 2015
I finally managed to take the survey and...
two minor things that we might be able to correct now (or later in the analysis phase)
In Q16: the option 'Policy & Implementation Working Group?' appears twice (Q
In Q19: it might be very relevant how often people post to the NCUC-EC list as it is... all, restricted to EC members and a handful of observers.
In any case, both these are basically irrelevant (we can even use them as control variables, eh eh)
Well done, thanks again
I can help in the analysis by the way, even if I don't expect we will run regression or modelling :-)
Da: membership-affairs-bounces at lists.ncuc.org <membership-affairs-bounces at lists.ncuc.org> per conto di Walid AL-SAQAF <wsaqaf at gmail.com>
Inviato: mercoledì 11 marzo 2015 18.07
A: membership-affairs at lists.ncuc.org
Oggetto: Re: [Membership-affairs] Dismal survey response rates
Agree with both you Amr and Stephanie. Will extend the deadline as we get closer to it.
Thanks for your wise thoughts :)
On Mar 11, 2015 4:59 PM, "Amr Elsadr" <aelsadr at egyptig.org<mailto:aelsadr at egyptig.org>> wrote:
Along with sending out reminders, it may also be a good idea to extend the deadline for submitting responses a little.
Although this group's been in quite a bit of dialogue involving creating the survey, the rest of the members haven't been as engaged. A combination of a campaign to get members to respond along with a little bit of a deadline extension may be helpful.
On Mar 11, 2015, at 4:52 PM, Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca<mailto:stephanie.perrin at mail.utoronto.ca>> wrote:
> Don't despair, we are all slow off the mark (I havent filled it out, and will probably require 3 reminders, that is pretty much standard). I think it is a good idea to get Maryam to send it out, you are probably right about the filters....some people only read their filtered files once a week.
> cheers Stephanie
> On 15-03-11 7:22 AM, Walid AL-SAQAF wrote:
>> Dear friends,
>> It looks like the NCUC survey is not getting enough traction as far as
>> I can tell. As of today, we have only 16 responses (less than 4%).
>> Do you have any suggestions to encourage more participation? Would it
>> be a good idea for example to post a message on the ICANN Fellows
>> mailing list (or other lists) for example where I know many are
>> actually NCUC members? We don't want to abuse those lists but if they
>> have to do with ICANN maybe such a step could be acceptable.
>> Could Maryam send out the invitation directly to members (via bcc)
>> through mass email instead of through the NCUC-discuss? It is not
>> unlikely that some members just ignore or automatically filter out
>> emails with the [NCUC-DISCUSS] heading (or other mailing list messages
>> for that matter).
>> Any ideas?
>> Membership-affairs mailing list
>> Membership-affairs at lists.ncuc.org<mailto:Membership-affairs at lists.ncuc.org>
> Membership-affairs mailing list
> Membership-affairs at lists.ncuc.org<mailto:Membership-affairs at lists.ncuc.org>
Membership-affairs mailing list
Membership-affairs at lists.ncuc.org<mailto:Membership-affairs at lists.ncuc.org>
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, forwarding, or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited without the express permission of the sender. If you received this communication in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Membership-affairs