[NCUC E-team] Question

[Brenden Kuerbis]

Date of last reply makes sense to me.
On Nov 6, 2014 11:49 AM, "Tapani Tarvainen" <ncuc at tapani.tarvainen.info>
wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 11:32:08AM -0500, Brenden Kuerbis (
> bkuerbis at internetgovernance.org) wrote:
>
> > I agree we don't want to remove members from database per Bill reasons.
> > Maybe the members state should remain 1 (they continue to have
> verification
> > emails during annual elections sent to last known email address), and we
> > (as Tapani suggests) track how many times they have not replied. Could
> that
> > be automated by editing verification script to update a new field?
>
> Yes. But instead of how many times they have not replied I think
> it'd be more useful to keep the date they did reply last.
> Or perhaps all dates they've ever replied...
>
> --
> Tapani Tarvainen
> _______________________________________________
> E-team mailing list
> E-team at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/e-team
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/e-team/attachments/20141106/ccef2115/attachment-0002.html>