[Bylaws] Process Re-visioning

[Remmy Nweke]

Good day all
I think also the way forward is for the bylawyers to agree on a meeting day
for member concern or highlighted concerns and we address this one after
another and page by page with Arun leading the pack and direction, so that
when we finish highlights we can now move on to highlights with special
effects, that is those who need expansion or extra time for tweaking.

At Best we can actually handle highlights with special effects except where
agreement becomes difficult and then move on untill we get to the last
part/page.

It may actually take more than one meeting call at least for the bylawyers
before we can open up for comments.
Just me thing!
Remmy Nweke
@ITRealms

Sent from my Windows Phone
------------------------------
From: William Drake <william.drake at uzh.ch>
Sent: ‎20/‎08/‎2015 09:15
To: NCUC Bylaws Revision Committee <bylaws at lists.ncuc.org>
Subject: Re: [Bylaws] Process Re-visioning

Hi

On Aug 20, 2015, at 8:22 AM, Arun Mohan Sukumar <arunmohan.s at gmail.com>
wrote:

Bill, good points - you're right about the need to re-vision this into a
holistic exercise. What can we do going ahead to ensure that there is
momentum in completing this exercise, even if it is not bound to a strict
timeline? As for the text, the letters in black seem identical to the
actual charter, but I suppose the added text, even if in a different
colour, may appear confusing to folks.

One way to go ahead with this is to open the call at the end of this month
to all willing NCUC members and make it into a brainstorming exercise.
Before we begin, i can present a list of barebones changes we ought to make
for NCSG conformity --- and the discussion can go forward on larger review
questions.


Sounds good to me.  I’d think it would make sense before we do a call if
others could get some of their top-level suggestions on the table as well.

As a starting point, what about having team members reply with points under
the following sorts of headings:

1.  Overarching Issues (holistic view of what’s needed)

2.  NCSG Charter Conformity Issues

3.  Discrepancies with Current Practices to Close

4.  “Would be Nice” Improvements

or some similar parsing…let’s agree the categories and then start tossing
our points in.

Re: the meeting, I’m looking at http://doodle.com/ncngb2w5tecmn3as and it
seems like the two end of the month options are not working so well for
people, there’s an awful lot of pink boxes. Time zone appears to be a
challenge for Rafik, who’d I’d think should be on the call(s).  17:30-19:00
seems a winner for everyone but him because it’s the middle of the night in
Japan.  Could people maybe take a second look at their schedules and see if
they could make one of the 15:30-17:00 slots work?

We also need replies from more people…I count 27 people in this team and
just 6 Doodle replies.  We can’t revise they bylaws with that level of
participation…

Best

Bill





*********************************************************
William J. Drake
International Fellow & Lecturer
  Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ
  University of Zurich, Switzerland
Chair, Noncommercial Users Constituency,
  ICANN, www.ncuc.org
william.drake at uzh.ch (direct), wjdrake at gmail.com (lists),
  www.williamdrake.org
*Internet Governance: The NETmundial Roadmap *http://goo.gl/sRR01q
*********************************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/bylaws/attachments/20150820/29ed3bbf/attachment-0002.html>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
Bylaws mailing list
Bylaws at lists.ncuc.org
http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/bylaws