[Bylaws] Process Re-visioning

William Drake william.drake at uzh.ch
Thu Aug 20 10:15:26 CEST 2015


Hi

> On Aug 20, 2015, at 8:22 AM, Arun Mohan Sukumar <arunmohan.s at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Bill, good points - you're right about the need to re-vision this into a holistic exercise. What can we do going ahead to ensure that there is momentum in completing this exercise, even if it is not bound to a strict timeline? As for the text, the letters in black seem identical to the actual charter, but I suppose the added text, even if in a different colour, may appear confusing to folks.
> 
> One way to go ahead with this is to open the call at the end of this month to all willing NCUC members and make it into a brainstorming exercise. Before we begin, i can present a list of barebones changes we ought to make for NCSG conformity --- and the discussion can go forward on larger review questions.

Sounds good to me.  I’d think it would make sense before we do a call if others could get some of their top-level suggestions on the table as well.

As a starting point, what about having team members reply with points under the following sorts of headings:

1.  Overarching Issues (holistic view of what’s needed)

2.  NCSG Charter Conformity Issues

3.  Discrepancies with Current Practices to Close

4.  “Would be Nice” Improvements

or some similar parsing…let’s agree the categories and then start tossing our points in.

Re: the meeting, I’m looking at http://doodle.com/ncngb2w5tecmn3as <http://doodle.com/ncngb2w5tecmn3as> and it seems like the two end of the month options are not working so well for people, there’s an awful lot of pink boxes. Time zone appears to be a challenge for Rafik, who’d I’d think should be on the call(s).  17:30-19:00 seems a winner for everyone but him because it’s the middle of the night in Japan.  Could people maybe take a second look at their schedules and see if they could make one of the 15:30-17:00 slots work?

We also need replies from more people…I count 27 people in this team and just 6 Doodle replies.  We can’t revise they bylaws with that level of participation…

Best

Bill 





*********************************************************
William J. Drake
International Fellow & Lecturer
  Media Change & Innovation Division, IPMZ
  University of Zurich, Switzerland
Chair, Noncommercial Users Constituency, 
  ICANN, www.ncuc.org
william.drake at uzh.ch (direct), wjdrake at gmail.com (lists),
  www.williamdrake.org
Internet Governance: The NETmundial Roadmap http://goo.gl/sRR01q
*********************************************************

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/bylaws/attachments/20150820/c55b2029/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the Bylaws mailing list