[Bylaws] Bylaws revision - working method

[William Drake]

Hi Amr

> On Aug 14, 2015, at 2:08 PM, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr at EGYPTIG.ORG> wrote:
> 
> I am curious though…, beyond ICANN 54, is there a deadline in mind by which we need to complete our work?

Per previous, not immediately. I’d think the revision should go to the board in the first Q of 2016 so we can have it on the December election ballot.  So we don’t actually have to have the thing completely done by Dublin, we just need to have worked though main issues and brought it to a point where we can have a focused discussion around bits that may require broader consensus building.

> I ask because the way I see it, it may be desirable to do more with the bylaws than just make them consistent with the NCSG charter.

Right

> There are sections of it that may warrant extensive discussion. One example that comes to mind is the NCUC policy committee — its structure, duties, role of chairs, and so on. There may be other issues as well, but I recall the policy committee as being one of the ones I believed needed more work. Eventually, all of this will have to be circulated to the members list with sufficient time for review/input.

Right

Bill

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/bylaws/attachments/20150814/b9879a1d/attachment-0002.html>