[Oprtf] OPRTF Call | Attendance & Zoom Recordings | Thursday, 15 May 2025

[Pedro de Perdigão Lana]

This is a kind reminder that our deadline is tomorrow, and we have only the
votes of the people who manifested their position in the call.

We have only two votes in the When2Meet, and, at least for now, the second
one cannot be counted because of instructions provided in the call and in
the previous message.

I would also like to highlight that, although I'm a great enthusiast of
creating new engagement opportunities, if the members of this task force
don't have enough time availability, this is not the ideal task to engage
with the constituency. When we start the substantial work, if we are not
being attentive to the asynchronous tasks and instructions, even one or two
people could significantly delay the work of the whole group - and here we
have deadlines demanded by the Operating Procedures themselves.

Cordially,

Em sex., 16 de mai. de 2025, 12:16, Pedro de Perdigão Lana <
pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> escreveu:

> Dear OPRTF,
>
> As promised, we have two decisions to make by Monday, May 19th, 23h59
> UTC/GMT: (1) Scope of the review and (2) Time and day of the week of our
> bi-weekly (one meeting every two weeks) reunions. By my rough calculations,
> we will have three meetings to work all sections.
>
> *1) To allow for more flexibility, I'm sending a When2Meet:
> https://www.when2meet.com/?30616789-9QcVU
> <https://www.when2meet.com/?30616789-9QcVU>. Please complete it by Monday. *To
> those that don't know, we have a quick tutorial here*: *
> https://www.when2meet.com/?About
> As agreed in the meeting, instead of alternating times, we will check what
> is the most adequate time and day for the majority and keep it for the
> following meeting - we will also need to check if the support staff is
> available on the defined slot. Please do not insert only your preferred
> time and day of the week, *but all the ones you are available.*
>
> *2) About the scope of our work, we have four alternatives of sections
> that we will review, which will affect the intensity of our work,
> considering we will have only 3 meetings to do non-asynchronous work:*
>
>    1. *Sections I to XI (original scoping of the EC)*
>    2. *Sections I to XI, excluding Section IX*
>    3. *Section I do XI + XIII and XIV*
>    4. *Full review of the OP*
>
> *I mentioned I'd make a form, but I think it is easier if you answer this
> email with your vote on each alternative, preferably indicating your
> reasoning. *Those who proposed each of these alternative scopes (Pascal,
> Hakikur, Oksana) can present their arguments, and others can also present
> divergent opinions. My vote is to maintain the original scoping of the EC,
> with the reasoning for each session listed in the Google Docs.
>
> Our next meeting will be to discuss Sections I and II of the Operating
> Procedures. *When you vote, answering this message, please note if you
> think we should broaden or reduce the scope.*
>
> *I'll create a Google Docs document only with the sections that we will be
> working with and share it here by Tuesday (Andrea, could you help me with
> that?), and we will then start the substantial work* *directly on the doc
> (using "Suggestion Mode"), presenting arguments as comments. We will use
> the meetings to solve and vote on the controversial ones.*
>
> If you have any doubt, please let us know.
>
> Cordially,
>
> *Pedro de Perdigão Lana*
> Lawyer <https://www.nic.br/>, GEDAI/UFPR <https://www.gedai.com.br/>
> Researcher
> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra)
> Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC Brazil <https://www.isoc.org.br/>, NCUC
> <https://www.ncuc.org/> & NCSG
> <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Home>(ICANN) and CC
> Brazil <https://br.creativecommons.net/>.
> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by
> mistake, please reply informing it.
>
>
> Em sex., 16 de mai. de 2025 às 10:50, Andrea Glandon <
> andrea.glandon at icann.org> escreveu:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>>
>>
>> Please find below the attendance and recordings from the Operating
>> Procedures Review Task Force meeting held on Thursday, 15 May 2025 at 15:00
>> UTC.
>>
>>
>>
>> This information is also available on the wiki here.
>> <https://icann-community.atlassian.net/wiki/x/AQDqE>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Attendees: *Atif Aleem, Gabriel Karsan, Hakikur Rahman, Jacob
>> Odame-Baiden, Lily Edinam Botsyoe, Namra Naseer, Oksana Prykhodko, Pascal
>> BEK., Pedro de Perdigão Lana, Stephen Dakyi | ICANN org: Devan Reed
>>
>>
>>
>> Zoom Replay
>> <https://icann.zoom.us/rec/play/wkEtogpw755-t00J8Z1X49Cah2zsXk0TKAXZ026pyoYQCQrIpYyRedW-NgS-8OZU3bZ8aDvCDiPg45CD.VVpF62NmBBT-RD8F>
>>
>> Audio Replay
>> <https://icann.zoom.us/rec/play/g53WZn-PduLIAkiL3-MyMXhX_d50mAtR4BAGz3e0FUh743pwNtwlll6vfniBIA2723Y_fE7UmUqmhHiz.uXBldhdFCzPMUuc2>
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> *Andrea Glandon*
>>
>> Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator
>>
>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Oprtf mailing list
>> Oprtf at lists.ncuc.org
>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/oprtf
>>
> *Pedro de Perdigão Lana*
Advogado - OAB/PR 90.600 <https://www.nic.br/>,  Pesquisador (GEDAI/UFPR
<https://www.gedai.com.br/>)
Doutorando em Direito (UFPR), Mestre em Direito Empresarial (UCoimbra),
Coordenação/Diretoria/EC @ ISOC Brasil <https://www.isoc.org.br/>, NCUC
<https://www.ncuc.org> & NCSG
<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Home>(ICANN), CC Brasil
<https://br.creativecommons.net/>.
Essa mensagem é restrita ao remetente e destinatário(s). Se recebida por
engano, favor responder informando o erro.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/oprtf/attachments/20250518/a69daa93/attachment.htm>