[Oprtf] OPRTF Call | Attendance & Zoom Recordings | Thursday, 15 May 2025

[Pedro de Perdigão Lana]

Dear OPRTF,

As promised, we have two decisions to make by Monday, May 19th, 23h59
UTC/GMT: (1) Scope of the review and (2) Time and day of the week of our
bi-weekly (one meeting every two weeks) reunions. By my rough calculations,
we will have three meetings to work all sections.

*1) To allow for more flexibility, I'm sending a When2Meet:
https://www.when2meet.com/?30616789-9QcVU
<https://www.when2meet.com/?30616789-9QcVU>. Please complete it by Monday. *To
those that don't know, we have a quick tutorial here*: *
https://www.when2meet.com/?About
As agreed in the meeting, instead of alternating times, we will check what
is the most adequate time and day for the majority and keep it for the
following meeting - we will also need to check if the support staff is
available on the defined slot. Please do not insert only your preferred
time and day of the week, *but all the ones you are available.*

*2) About the scope of our work, we have four alternatives of sections that
we will review, which will affect the intensity of our work, considering we
will have only 3 meetings to do non-asynchronous work:*

   1. *Sections I to XI (original scoping of the EC)*
   2. *Sections I to XI, excluding Section IX*
   3. *Section I do XI + XIII and XIV*
   4. *Full review of the OP*

*I mentioned I'd make a form, but I think it is easier if you answer this
email with your vote on each alternative, preferably indicating your
reasoning. *Those who proposed each of these alternative scopes (Pascal,
Hakikur, Oksana) can present their arguments, and others can also present
divergent opinions. My vote is to maintain the original scoping of the EC,
with the reasoning for each session listed in the Google Docs.

Our next meeting will be to discuss Sections I and II of the Operating
Procedures. *When you vote, answering this message, please note if you
think we should broaden or reduce the scope.*

*I'll create a Google Docs document only with the sections that we will be
working with and share it here by Tuesday (Andrea, could you help me with
that?), and we will then start the substantial work* *directly on the doc
(using "Suggestion Mode"), presenting arguments as comments. We will use
the meetings to solve and vote on the controversial ones.*

If you have any doubt, please let us know.

Cordially,

*Pedro de Perdigão Lana*
Lawyer <https://www.nic.br/>, GEDAI/UFPR <https://www.gedai.com.br/>
Researcher
PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra)
Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC Brazil <https://www.isoc.org.br/>, NCUC
<https://www.ncuc.org/> & NCSG
<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Home>(ICANN) and CC
Brazil <https://br.creativecommons.net/>.
This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by
mistake, please reply informing it.


Em sex., 16 de mai. de 2025 às 10:50, Andrea Glandon <
andrea.glandon at icann.org> escreveu:

> Hello all,
>
>
>
> Please find below the attendance and recordings from the Operating
> Procedures Review Task Force meeting held on Thursday, 15 May 2025 at 15:00
> UTC.
>
>
>
> This information is also available on the wiki here.
> <https://icann-community.atlassian.net/wiki/x/AQDqE>
>
>
>
> *Attendees: *Atif Aleem, Gabriel Karsan, Hakikur Rahman, Jacob
> Odame-Baiden, Lily Edinam Botsyoe, Namra Naseer, Oksana Prykhodko, Pascal
> BEK., Pedro de Perdigão Lana, Stephen Dakyi | ICANN org: Devan Reed
>
>
>
> Zoom Replay
> <https://icann.zoom.us/rec/play/wkEtogpw755-t00J8Z1X49Cah2zsXk0TKAXZ026pyoYQCQrIpYyRedW-NgS-8OZU3bZ8aDvCDiPg45CD.VVpF62NmBBT-RD8F>
>
> Audio Replay
> <https://icann.zoom.us/rec/play/g53WZn-PduLIAkiL3-MyMXhX_d50mAtR4BAGz3e0FUh743pwNtwlll6vfniBIA2723Y_fE7UmUqmhHiz.uXBldhdFCzPMUuc2>
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> *Andrea Glandon*
>
> Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator
>
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>
>
>
>
> --
> Oprtf mailing list
> Oprtf at lists.ncuc.org
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/oprtf
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/oprtf/attachments/20250516/c2a051f4/attachment.htm>