[NCUC-EC] [Oprtf] OPRTF Second Meeting + Working Doc
Houda CHIHI
houda.chihi at gmail.com
Wed May 28 21:23:42 CEST 2025
Dear All,
Please accept my apologies as the agreed meeting time doesn't work for me
so please share the recording,
Kind regards,
Le mer. 28 mai 2025 à 15:36, Pedro de Perdigão Lana <
pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> a écrit :
> Reminder that our call to work with the first two sections will be
> tomorrow, 15h00 UTC/GMT, and that *all suggestions should be added to the
> Google Docs until tomorrow, or they won't be evaluated during the call.*
>
> I've provided my input for others' comments there - please review.
>
> Cordially,
>
> *Pedro de Perdigão Lana*
> Lawyer <https://www.nic.br/>, GEDAI/UFPR <https://www.gedai.com.br/>
> Researcher
> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra)
> Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC Brazil <https://www.isoc.org.br/>, NCUC
> <https://www.ncuc.org/> & NCSG
> <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Home>(ICANN) and CC
> Brazil <https://br.creativecommons.net/>.
> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by
> mistake, please reply informing it.
>
>
> Em qui., 22 de mai. de 2025 às 16:00, Mohammad Atif <atifzhcet14 at gmail.com>
> escreveu:
>
>> Dear Pedro & OPRTF Team,
>>
>> I have gone through the document and added my suggestions and comments.
>> Look forward to our meeting on May 29 to discuss further.
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Mohammad Atif.
>>
>> On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 6:50 PM Pedro de Perdigão Lana <
>> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear OP Review Task Force,
>>>
>>> As defined by the votes cast in the previous exchange, with a 1-day
>>> margin for late answers, *we will review Sections I-XI of the Operating
>>> Procedures, in bi-weekly (once per two weeks) meetings, every other
>>> Thursday at 15h00 UTC.*
>>>
>>> *Our first meeting will be next week, 29th of May, 15h00 UTC, reviewing
>>> Sections I and II of the Operating Procedures. **Andrea, can you please
>>> help us create the link and send the invitations?*
>>>
>>> *The First working doc link is here *(I've re-formatted it to be easier
>>> to work with)*, and only task force members have access to it: *
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Tj_FeAzC6iyomaOoeR5ht2wfM6fGCmpYAcCDpGITfd4/edit?tab=t.0
>>>
>>> *I ask you to input your comments and suggestions directly on the doc. *If
>>> you don't have access to the doc, please let me know and send me your email
>>> that is linked to your Google account.
>>>
>>> *If you don't agree with an insertion or suppression, add your comment
>>> to the Google Docs directly on the suggestion you disagree with. *
>>>
>>> To guarantee that people read and think in advance, effectively using
>>> the asynchronous time available for our effort here, *we will be
>>> debating during the calls only the suggestions added in advance, and no new
>>> inputs will be accepted during or after the meeting (unless it couldn't be
>>> done before) for Sections that were already reviewed.*
>>>
>>> Cordially,
>>>
>>> *Pedro de Perdigão Lana*
>>> Lawyer <https://www.nic.br/>, GEDAI/UFPR <https://www.gedai.com.br/>
>>> Researcher
>>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra)
>>> Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC Brazil <https://www.isoc.org.br/>, NCUC
>>> <https://www.ncuc.org/> & NCSG
>>> <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Home>(ICANN) and CC
>>> Brazil <https://br.creativecommons.net/>.
>>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received
>>> by mistake, please reply informing it.
>>> --
>>> Oprtf mailing list
>>> Oprtf at lists.ncuc.org
>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/oprtf
>>>
>> --
> Oprtf mailing list
> Oprtf at lists.ncuc.org
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/oprtf
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20250528/ae2285d9/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the NCUC-EC
mailing list