[NCUC-EC] [Oprtf] OPRTF Second Meeting + Working Doc

[Pedro de Perdigão Lana]

Reminder that our call to work with the first two sections will be
tomorrow, 15h00 UTC/GMT, and that *all suggestions should be added to the
Google Docs until tomorrow, or they won't be evaluated during the call.*

I've provided my input for others' comments there - please review.

Cordially,

*Pedro de Perdigão Lana*
Lawyer <https://www.nic.br/>, GEDAI/UFPR <https://www.gedai.com.br/>
Researcher
PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra)
Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC Brazil <https://www.isoc.org.br/>, NCUC
<https://www.ncuc.org/> & NCSG
<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Home>(ICANN) and CC
Brazil <https://br.creativecommons.net/>.
This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by
mistake, please reply informing it.


Em qui., 22 de mai. de 2025 às 16:00, Mohammad Atif <atifzhcet14 at gmail.com>
escreveu:

> Dear Pedro & OPRTF Team,
>
> I have gone through the document and added my suggestions and comments.
> Look forward to our meeting on May 29 to discuss further.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Best Regards,
> Mohammad Atif.
>
> On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 6:50 PM Pedro de Perdigão Lana <
> pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear OP Review Task Force,
>>
>> As defined by the votes cast in the previous exchange, with a 1-day
>> margin for late answers, *we will review Sections I-XI of the Operating
>> Procedures, in bi-weekly (once per two weeks) meetings, every other
>> Thursday at 15h00 UTC.*
>>
>> *Our first meeting will be next week, 29th of May, 15h00 UTC, reviewing
>> Sections I and II of the Operating Procedures. **Andrea, can you please
>> help us create the link and send the invitations?*
>>
>> *The First working doc link is here *(I've re-formatted it to be easier
>> to work with)*, and only task force members have access to it: *
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Tj_FeAzC6iyomaOoeR5ht2wfM6fGCmpYAcCDpGITfd4/edit?tab=t.0
>>
>> *I ask you to input your comments and suggestions directly on the doc. *If
>> you don't have access to the doc, please let me know and send me your email
>> that is linked to your Google account.
>>
>> *If you don't agree with an insertion or suppression, add your comment to
>> the Google Docs directly on the suggestion you disagree with. *
>>
>> To guarantee that people read and think in advance, effectively using the
>> asynchronous time available for our effort here, *we will be debating
>> during the calls only the suggestions added in advance, and no new inputs
>> will be accepted during or after the meeting (unless it couldn't be done
>> before) for Sections that were already reviewed.*
>>
>> Cordially,
>>
>> *Pedro de Perdigão Lana*
>> Lawyer <https://www.nic.br/>, GEDAI/UFPR <https://www.gedai.com.br/>
>> Researcher
>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra)
>> Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC Brazil <https://www.isoc.org.br/>, NCUC
>> <https://www.ncuc.org/> & NCSG
>> <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Home>(ICANN) and CC
>> Brazil <https://br.creativecommons.net/>.
>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by
>> mistake, please reply informing it.
>> --
>> Oprtf mailing list
>> Oprtf at lists.ncuc.org
>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/oprtf
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20250528/ffae114a/attachment.htm>