[NCUC-EC] [Ext] Re: NCUC Operating Procedures Review Volunteers

Fri May 2 16:44:04 CEST 2025

typo: acronym for *Operat*ing* Procedures Review Task Force

*Pedro de Perdigão Lana*
Lawyer <https://www.nic.br/>, GEDAI/UFPR <https://www.gedai.com.br/>
Researcher
PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra)
Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC Brazil <https://www.isoc.org.br/>, NCUC
<https://www.ncuc.org/> & NCSG
<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Home>(ICANN) and CC
Brazil <https://br.creativecommons.net/>.
This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by
mistake, please reply informing it.

Em sex., 2 de mai. de 2025 às 11:42, Pedro de Perdigão Lana <
pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> escreveu:

> Hi Andrea!
>
> Thank you so much - <OPRTF at lists.ncuc.org> seems like the best option
> (which is an acronym for Operational Procedures Review Task Force)
>
> Cordially,
>
> *Pedro de Perdigão Lana*
> Lawyer <https://www.nic.br/>, GEDAI/UFPR <https://www.gedai.com.br/>
> Researcher
> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra)
> Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC Brazil <https://www.isoc.org.br/>, NCUC
> <https://www.ncuc.org/> & NCSG
> <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Home>(ICANN) and CC
> Brazil <https://br.creativecommons.net/>.
> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by
> mistake, please reply informing it.
>
>
> Em sex., 2 de mai. de 2025 às 10:10, Andrea Glandon <
> andrea.glandon at icann.org> escreveu:
>
>> Hello Pedro,
>>
>>
>>
>> Even though NCUC does not use ICANN org email, I think I can get into the
>> NCUC Mailman and create a new email. I am checking on this and I will let
>> you know. Do you have a specific name you would like to be used?
>>
>>
>>
>> Kind Regards,
>>
>> Andrea
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *Pedro de Perdigão Lana <pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com>
>> *Date: *Wednesday, April 30, 2025 at 16:58
>> *To: *Andrea Glandon <andrea.glandon at icann.org>, Namra Naseer <
>> fr.namra at gmail.com>
>> *Cc: *"Exec. Comm" <ncuc-ec at lists.ncuc.org>
>> *Subject: *[Ext] Re: [NCUC-EC] NCUC Operating Procedures Review
>> Volunteers
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Wisdom, EC, Andrea,
>>
>>
>>
>> My suggestion on how to proceed now:
>>
>>
>>
>> If we don't have reservations about any of these names, we can proceed to
>> email them personally, adding them to a temporary email list that will be
>> used only for the Operating Procedures (*"6. The task force should
>> primarily operate on a to-be-determined NCUC email list with archives open
>> to members, and it should hold regular meetings to create a draft on which
>> parts of the operating procedures need revision and how they should be
>> addressed"*), and then announce the selected team and the penholders (me
>> and Namra - @Namra Naseer <fr.namra at gmail.com>, if you can just confirm
>> that you will be available, that would be perfect!).
>>
>>
>>
>> I think we can have until tomorrow to see if we can approve them all and
>> then add them to the list on Friday, and schedule the first meeting for the
>> week that starts on May 12th. We will have the LACNIC/LACNOG meeting here
>> in São Paulo from May 5 to May 9, and I'll be mostly unavailable.
>>
>>
>>
>> *May 15th would be the best day to me by far, and ideal hours would be
>> from 10h30-12h00 UTC, 15-16h30 UTC, or after 21 UTC. **@Namra Naseer*
>> <fr.namra at gmail.com>* and others who will be part of the task force, do
>> any of those times (and on this day) work for you? If those 3 possibilities
>> work for everyone, we can create a When2Meet or Doodle to be answered by
>> the task force. *
>>
>>
>>
>> Remembering that, per the OPs, at least one EC member should be present
>> at all task force meetings.
>>
>>
>>
>> In this meeting, my suggestion is that we point out the changes we have
>> already identified as possibilities, check if there are any reservations
>> from the members regarding alteration in any of these sections. Then, we
>> create with the task force a weekly calendar to work on each section, doing
>> most of the work asynchronously on a collaborative document (I think Google
>> Docs is fine) and then debating and accepting the suggested chances once a
>> week (or once every other week, if the task force prefers this way),
>> similar to the work we do in WGs and IRTs when drafting documents. We have
>> a 60-day deadline to finish this phase (which is also mandatory per the
>> OP), then there is a back-and-forth between the EC and the whole NCUC
>> community.
>>
>>
>>
>> I need help with how to create a separate mailing list - Andrea, should I
>> reach Tapani, or can we request that from you?
>>
>>
>>
>> *Do we all agree with those next steps? If there is any other suggestion,
>> we can postpone the beginning of the work to discuss it here (although I
>> think none of it is controversial).*
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks to everyone's dedication to this task!
>>
>>
>> *Pedro de Perdigão Lana*
>>
>> Lawyer [nic.br]
>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.nic.br/__;!!PtGJab4!47uU_WPK_VoC4FYHEs20FsKS0qQpBYpwg3wnFR9SosvX35RDW9IXA1mqHlydrk7T5NwZPiaSuvIkAXWHHP11Df-jvVF6Jhckwkwr$>,
>> GEDAI/UFPR [gedai.com.br]
>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.gedai.com.br/__;!!PtGJab4!47uU_WPK_VoC4FYHEs20FsKS0qQpBYpwg3wnFR9SosvX35RDW9IXA1mqHlydrk7T5NwZPiaSuvIkAXWHHP11Df-jvVF6Jk80gLSO$>
>> Researcher
>>
>> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra)
>>
>> Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC Brazil [isoc.org.br]
>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.isoc.org.br/__;!!PtGJab4!47uU_WPK_VoC4FYHEs20FsKS0qQpBYpwg3wnFR9SosvX35RDW9IXA1mqHlydrk7T5NwZPiaSuvIkAXWHHP11Df-jvVF6JiwwYyah$>
>> , NCUC [ncuc.org]
>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.ncuc.org/__;!!PtGJab4!47uU_WPK_VoC4FYHEs20FsKS0qQpBYpwg3wnFR9SosvX35RDW9IXA1mqHlydrk7T5NwZPiaSuvIkAXWHHP11Df-jvVF6Jk_F5wGp$>
>>  & NCSG  <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Home>(ICANN)
>> and CC Brazil [br.creativecommons.net]
>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/br.creativecommons.net/__;!!PtGJab4!47uU_WPK_VoC4FYHEs20FsKS0qQpBYpwg3wnFR9SosvX35RDW9IXA1mqHlydrk7T5NwZPiaSuvIkAXWHHP11Df-jvVF6JiERnLpm$>
>> .
>>
>> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by
>> mistake, please reply informing it.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Em ter., 29 de abr. de 2025 às 10:25, Andrea Glandon <
>> andrea.glandon at icann.org> escreveu:
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>>
>>
>> Here [docs.google.com]
>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1WgiwXd4nFNvxuNWJtACY-_Qg8qjC2nUnCNVsEg5b8GM/edit?usp=sharing__;!!PtGJab4!47uU_WPK_VoC4FYHEs20FsKS0qQpBYpwg3wnFR9SosvX35RDW9IXA1mqHlydrk7T5NwZPiaSuvIkAXWHHP11Df-jvVF6JleN1xK8$>
>> is a list of those who have volunteered to be part of the Operating
>> Procedures review. The deadline to send in their interest was yesterday.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> *Andrea Glandon*
>>
>> Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator
>>
>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCUC-EC mailing list
>> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec [lists.ncuc.org]
>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec__;!!PtGJab4!47uU_WPK_VoC4FYHEs20FsKS0qQpBYpwg3wnFR9SosvX35RDW9IXA1mqHlydrk7T5NwZPiaSuvIkAXWHHP11Df-jvVF6Jiv8WDCk$>
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20250502/f13c8397/attachment-0001.htm>