[NCUC-EC] [Ext] Re: NCUC Operating Procedures Review Volunteers

Pedro de Perdigão Lana pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com
Fri May 2 16:42:25 CEST 2025


Hi Andrea!

Thank you so much - <OPRTF at lists.ncuc.org> seems like the best option
(which is an acronym for Operational Procedures Review Task Force)

Cordially,

*Pedro de Perdigão Lana*
Lawyer <https://www.nic.br/>, GEDAI/UFPR <https://www.gedai.com.br/>
Researcher
PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra)
Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC Brazil <https://www.isoc.org.br/>, NCUC
<https://www.ncuc.org/> & NCSG
<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Home>(ICANN) and CC
Brazil <https://br.creativecommons.net/>.
This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by
mistake, please reply informing it.


Em sex., 2 de mai. de 2025 às 10:10, Andrea Glandon <
andrea.glandon at icann.org> escreveu:

> Hello Pedro,
>
>
>
> Even though NCUC does not use ICANN org email, I think I can get into the
> NCUC Mailman and create a new email. I am checking on this and I will let
> you know. Do you have a specific name you would like to be used?
>
>
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Andrea
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Pedro de Perdigão Lana <pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com>
> *Date: *Wednesday, April 30, 2025 at 16:58
> *To: *Andrea Glandon <andrea.glandon at icann.org>, Namra Naseer <
> fr.namra at gmail.com>
> *Cc: *"Exec. Comm" <ncuc-ec at lists.ncuc.org>
> *Subject: *[Ext] Re: [NCUC-EC] NCUC Operating Procedures Review Volunteers
>
>
>
> Hi Wisdom, EC, Andrea,
>
>
>
> My suggestion on how to proceed now:
>
>
>
> If we don't have reservations about any of these names, we can proceed to
> email them personally, adding them to a temporary email list that will be
> used only for the Operating Procedures (*"6. The task force should
> primarily operate on a to-be-determined NCUC email list with archives open
> to members, and it should hold regular meetings to create a draft on which
> parts of the operating procedures need revision and how they should be
> addressed"*), and then announce the selected team and the penholders (me
> and Namra - @Namra Naseer <fr.namra at gmail.com>, if you can just confirm
> that you will be available, that would be perfect!).
>
>
>
> I think we can have until tomorrow to see if we can approve them all and
> then add them to the list on Friday, and schedule the first meeting for the
> week that starts on May 12th. We will have the LACNIC/LACNOG meeting here
> in São Paulo from May 5 to May 9, and I'll be mostly unavailable.
>
>
>
> *May 15th would be the best day to me by far, and ideal hours would be
> from 10h30-12h00 UTC, 15-16h30 UTC, or after 21 UTC. **@Namra Naseer*
> <fr.namra at gmail.com>* and others who will be part of the task force, do
> any of those times (and on this day) work for you? If those 3 possibilities
> work for everyone, we can create a When2Meet or Doodle to be answered by
> the task force. *
>
>
>
> Remembering that, per the OPs, at least one EC member should be present at
> all task force meetings.
>
>
>
> In this meeting, my suggestion is that we point out the changes we have
> already identified as possibilities, check if there are any reservations
> from the members regarding alteration in any of these sections. Then, we
> create with the task force a weekly calendar to work on each section, doing
> most of the work asynchronously on a collaborative document (I think Google
> Docs is fine) and then debating and accepting the suggested chances once a
> week (or once every other week, if the task force prefers this way),
> similar to the work we do in WGs and IRTs when drafting documents. We have
> a 60-day deadline to finish this phase (which is also mandatory per the
> OP), then there is a back-and-forth between the EC and the whole NCUC
> community.
>
>
>
> I need help with how to create a separate mailing list - Andrea, should I
> reach Tapani, or can we request that from you?
>
>
>
> *Do we all agree with those next steps? If there is any other suggestion,
> we can postpone the beginning of the work to discuss it here (although I
> think none of it is controversial).*
>
>
>
> Thanks to everyone's dedication to this task!
>
>
> *Pedro de Perdigão Lana*
>
> Lawyer [nic.br]
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.nic.br/__;!!PtGJab4!47uU_WPK_VoC4FYHEs20FsKS0qQpBYpwg3wnFR9SosvX35RDW9IXA1mqHlydrk7T5NwZPiaSuvIkAXWHHP11Df-jvVF6Jhckwkwr$>,
> GEDAI/UFPR [gedai.com.br]
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.gedai.com.br/__;!!PtGJab4!47uU_WPK_VoC4FYHEs20FsKS0qQpBYpwg3wnFR9SosvX35RDW9IXA1mqHlydrk7T5NwZPiaSuvIkAXWHHP11Df-jvVF6Jk80gLSO$>
> Researcher
>
> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra)
>
> Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC Brazil [isoc.org.br]
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.isoc.org.br/__;!!PtGJab4!47uU_WPK_VoC4FYHEs20FsKS0qQpBYpwg3wnFR9SosvX35RDW9IXA1mqHlydrk7T5NwZPiaSuvIkAXWHHP11Df-jvVF6JiwwYyah$>
> , NCUC [ncuc.org]
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.ncuc.org/__;!!PtGJab4!47uU_WPK_VoC4FYHEs20FsKS0qQpBYpwg3wnFR9SosvX35RDW9IXA1mqHlydrk7T5NwZPiaSuvIkAXWHHP11Df-jvVF6Jk_F5wGp$>
>  & NCSG  <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Home>(ICANN)
> and CC Brazil [br.creativecommons.net]
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/br.creativecommons.net/__;!!PtGJab4!47uU_WPK_VoC4FYHEs20FsKS0qQpBYpwg3wnFR9SosvX35RDW9IXA1mqHlydrk7T5NwZPiaSuvIkAXWHHP11Df-jvVF6JiERnLpm$>
> .
>
> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by
> mistake, please reply informing it.
>
>
>
>
>
> Em ter., 29 de abr. de 2025 às 10:25, Andrea Glandon <
> andrea.glandon at icann.org> escreveu:
>
> Hello all,
>
>
>
> Here [docs.google.com]
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1WgiwXd4nFNvxuNWJtACY-_Qg8qjC2nUnCNVsEg5b8GM/edit?usp=sharing__;!!PtGJab4!47uU_WPK_VoC4FYHEs20FsKS0qQpBYpwg3wnFR9SosvX35RDW9IXA1mqHlydrk7T5NwZPiaSuvIkAXWHHP11Df-jvVF6JleN1xK8$>
> is a list of those who have volunteered to be part of the Operating
> Procedures review. The deadline to send in their interest was yesterday.
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> *Andrea Glandon*
>
> Policy Operations Sr. Coordinator
>
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCUC-EC mailing list
> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec [lists.ncuc.org]
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec__;!!PtGJab4!47uU_WPK_VoC4FYHEs20FsKS0qQpBYpwg3wnFR9SosvX35RDW9IXA1mqHlydrk7T5NwZPiaSuvIkAXWHHP11Df-jvVF6Jiv8WDCk$>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20250502/c9c4a6d6/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the NCUC-EC mailing list