[NCUC-EC] Operating Procedures Review

[Wisdom Donkor]

*Dear Pedro and Namra,*
Thank you both for the excellent work.
I will proceed to share the call for comments with the list and will also
take the opportunity to commend the task force and penholders for their
outstanding efforts later today.

Kind regards,

*Wisdom Donkor* (CASP+,  CISM, CEH Certified)
Chair, NCUC
Tel: +233 20 812 8851
Skype: wisdom_dk | Facebook: kwasi wisdom |  Twitter: @wisdom_dk
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
ICANN GNSO Council Member | ICANN transfer policy review working group
Member  | Council Committee for Overseeing and Implementing Continuous
Improvement (CCOICI) | UN IGF MAG Member | IGF Support Fund Association
Executive Committee Member, World Bank Independent Consultant | AU AFIGF
Member |  Ghana OGP Advisory Committee member | GSS SDGs Advisory Committee
Member
____________________________________________________________________________________________
Specialization:
E-government Network Infrastructure and E-application, Internet
Governance,  Open Data policies platforms & Community Development, Cyber
Security, Geospatial Technologies, Open Source Technologies, Domain Name
Systems, Human Resource Planning and Development, Software Engineering,
Event Planning & Management,


On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 4:23 AM Pedro de Perdigão Lana <
pedrodeperdigaolana at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi EC,
>
> Here is the final doc that came from the Operating Procedures Review Task
> Force (OPRTF). The OPRTF work is done.
>
> We have now to share the doc through the NCUC-Discuss mail list,  I don't
> know if the chair should do it or one of the penholders. *Namra, can you
> help me add the rationales to the changes that were made, if I missed
> something important? *
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qJORoUG229UxqC3PkKpxjc7D9PiZdw_ZM-0oSeu4CDk/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.w3thgepi4brj
>
> Important to note that aesthetic changes (grammatical corrections, for
> example) were not highlighted in this final document, they were simply made
> directly on the file.
>
> *Per the Operating Procedures review process, the EC does not have any
> action at this phase. We will just send the doc to the community for a (at
> least) 14-day public comment, and after that we will have an EC-review
> phase (which we can simplify, since the penholders are both part of the EC
> and this could be done through a single extraordinary meeting)., and then a
> final public comment from the community.*
>
> Here are the working documents that the OPRTF used during its work, for
> documentation purposes:
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Tj_FeAzC6iyomaOoeR5ht2wfM6fGCmpYAcCDpGITfd4/edit?tab=t.0
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XfKcFS1meIQczWc_hRKBllEpU7Ty2fHvZhUkQOjfHnw/edit?tab=t.0
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1z4YR2iDFcJnZIBlCHiGXowDHnZ964I5_JqF4-0yQrRo/edit?tab=t.0
>
> Cordially,
>
> *Pedro de Perdigão Lana*
> Lawyer <https://www.nic.br/>, GEDAI/UFPR <https://www.gedai.com.br/>
> Researcher
> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra)
> Coordination/Board/EC @ ISOC Brazil <https://www.isoc.org.br/>, NCUC
> <https://www.ncuc.org/> & NCSG
> <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Home>(ICANN) and CC
> Brazil <https://br.creativecommons.net/>.
> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received by
> mistake, please reply informing it.
> _______________________________________________
> NCUC-EC mailing list
> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20250721/d60a8010/attachment.htm>