[NCUC-EC] Concerns Regarding NCUC Decision-Making and Session Legitimacy

[Pedro de Perdigão Lana]

Hi Ines, Amin,

I’m sorry, I thought I had mentioned this in our mail list before, but I
can’t get involved with the outreach event rn - I eas able to help with the
initial push, but other obligations are consuming all of my time (including
those hours I need to rest well) and I am not following well the
discussions around the outreach event, nor do I know the current agenda.

As soon as I can, I’ll read the other emails sent related to this subject
and see if I can still help with something.

Cordially,

*Pedro de Perdigão Lana*
Advogado - OAB/PR 90.600 <https://www.nic.br/>,  Pesquisador (GEDAI/UFPR
<https://www.gedai.com.br/>)
Doutorando em Direito (UFPR), Mestre em Direito Empresarial (UCoimbra),
Coordenação/Diretoria/EC @ ISOC BR <https://isoc.org.br/>, NCUC
<https://www.ncuc.org> & NCSG
<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Home>(ICANN),
YouthLACIGF <https://youthlacigf.lat/>, IODA <https://ioda.org.br/> e CC
Brasil <https://br.creativecommons.net/>.
Essa mensagem é restrita ao remetente e destinatário(s). Se recebida por
engano, favor responder informando o erro.


Em ter., 5 de nov. de 2024 às 15:47, Amin Hacha <aminhacha at gmail.com>
escreveu:

> Dear Iness, Thank you for your approach.
> In a previous email, I proposed organizing this session titled "Civil
> Society Organizations Roundtable: A Joint Outreach by NCUC." Also, I
> suggested extending invitations to both NGSC and NPOC to collaborate with
> us. We can also reach APRALO, EURALO, UA and local.
> I believe it would be beneficial to focus on a more inclusive approach,
> where we share and listen to everyone's input, rather than limiting the
> session to speakers discussing specific topics.
> your thoughts?
>
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2024 at 5:22 PM Hfaiedh Ines <hfaiedh.ines2 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello Amin and Pedro could you please share your ideas//suggestions so
>> that maybe we can merge and synchronise the suggestions with those made by
>> Ben? I believe there s still room for suggestion on the doc as it s not
>> very finalised.
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 5, 2024, 14:03 Amin Hacha <aminhacha at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear EC Members,
>>> As follow to my previous email regarding Benjamin's recent response,
>>> which came through another email rather than directly replying here. His
>>> response left our questions unanswered and didn’t address the key points I
>>> raised. The reply was as far as needed.
>>>
>>> I have some critical points that need clarification:
>>> 1- Communication Transparency: If we had not inquired, would the EC have
>>> been informed at all?
>>> 2- Has Benjamin considered or discussed our suggestion to collaborate
>>> with NCSG, NPO, or other relevant groups for this outreach initiative?
>>> 3- Event Scheduling: In a previous email, we asked Andrea about the
>>> availability of a meeting room and proposed holding our session immediately
>>> after the opening ceremony to encourage attendees from Turkey to stay and
>>> participate. Why was the session then scheduled for the afternoon? What
>>> criteria led to this timing? have we been asked or discussed ? !!
>>> 4- As I mentioned earlier, this issue has been frustrating (at least for
>>> me). On October 7, an agenda was circulated by Benjamin to a limited group,
>>> detailing various speakers and topics that differ significantly from the
>>> version we received today. Neither I nor other EC members ( Except Iness)
>>> were kept in the loop despite our involvement in the preparations. At that
>>> time, I waited a full ten days, expecting an update from Benjamin before
>>> raising the issue with the EC.
>>> 5 - and more
>>>
>>> As well, I am presenting this as a matter and highlighting the need for
>>> clear communication and collaboration moving forward. Also, your insights
>>> on the question I posed at the end of my previous email would be greatly
>>> appreciated.
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>> Amin
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 5, 2024 at 3:55 AM Amin Hacha <aminhacha at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear Executive Committee Members of NCUC,
>>>> I’m reaching out to address a recent issue regarding our collaborative
>>>> process in NCUC decisions.
>>>> I feel that Benjamin has been making decisions independently, without
>>>> adequately engaging the Executive Committee or considering the input we've
>>>> provided, including suggestions from my recent emails. I regret to point
>>>> this out, but this is what occurred!
>>>>
>>>> I want to bring to your attention that in my October 17 email, I raised
>>>> my concerns and my discomfort because I received a copy of the agenda of
>>>> the NCUC Outreach session at ICANN81 from someone outside the executive
>>>> committee! The agenda, prepared and shared by Benjamin on October 7,
>>>> coincides with the same time when Pedro, Benjamin, and I are working
>>>> together to organize the session!!!! This lack of transparency has caused
>>>> some confusion, especially with mistakes that I have highlighted previously.
>>>>
>>>> Given these circumstances, I feel compelled to question both the
>>>> legality of this approach and the legitimacy of the NCUC Outreach Session
>>>> planned for ICANN81.
>>>>
>>>> I appreciate your prompt response and support in addressing this
>>>> matter, as I believe it’s essential for us to work together with
>>>> transparency and mutual respect.
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Amin
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NCUC-EC mailing list
>>> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
> NCUC-EC mailing list
> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20241107/40dcccc5/attachment.htm>