[NCUC-EC] NCUC-EC Digest, Vol 61, Issue 74
farzaneh badii
farzaneh.badii at gmail.com
Wed Feb 28 20:14:22 CET 2018
Just to put your mind a bit at ease: speakers and organizers have already
received a code in the acceptance email that can allow them register for
free. If you don't have the code, let me know.
Farzaneh
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 2:10 PM, <ncuc-ec-request at lists.ncuc.org> wrote:
> Send NCUC-EC mailing list submissions to
> ncuc-ec at lists.ncuc.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> ncuc-ec-request at lists.ncuc.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> ncuc-ec-owner at lists.ncuc.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of NCUC-EC digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Crop Proposals - still waiting? (Michael Karanicolas)
> 2. Re: reminder: CROP proposals in evaluation (Louise Marie Hurel)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 14:47:15 -0400
> From: Michael Karanicolas <mkaranicolas at gmail.com>
> To: "Exec. Comm" <ncuc-ec at lists.ncuc.org>
> Subject: [NCUC-EC] Crop Proposals - still waiting?
> Message-ID:
> <CAGQVoTgmdSVKCaLvFfE5qUvg0FDr_7beJEc=VkUDj4zEqFmsOQ at mail.
> gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> Hi all,
>
> Just writing to remind that there are still three CROP proposals under
> consideration. For two of them - LACNIC and AIS - the events are
> scheduled for end of April - which means we've officially reached the
> two month window where we need a decision, and if deliberations go on
> much longer we risk losing the possibility of getting them processed
> by ICANN in time.
>
> There's slightly more space for the RightsCon one (a couple of weeks)
> - but this is a proposal that was submitted back in December - so it's
> now been in front of the EC for around 10 weeks. Also, this is the
> last day or early-pricing for RightsCon, so would be helpful to hear
> back.
>
> Best,
>
> Michael
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 14:10:32 -0500
> From: Louise Marie Hurel <louise.marie.hsd at gmail.com>
> To: Michael Karanicolas <mkaranicolas at gmail.com>
> Cc: hfaiedh ines <hfaiedh.ines2 at gmail.com>, "Exec. Comm"
> <ncuc-ec at lists.ncuc.org>
> Subject: Re: [NCUC-EC] reminder: CROP proposals in evaluation
> Message-ID:
> <CA+Ks+AC-z9eEkX+m2VGyWBBNR=skKJ1G1sHnJPgkxwnmSzegxw at mail.
> gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Dear all,
>
> My apologies for the delay.
> After taking a close look at the proposals, I'd vote yes for all of them.
> While I agree that strategies for LAC and AF have to be further detailed,
> proponents show high commitment and willingness to take NCUC regional
> engagement also as a way for them to get more involved in the community -
> we want this energy! I would also point out that, especially for LAC and
> AF, it is great to see more community members taking the stand to apply for
> CROP. As said in previous emails there is still a challenge for people to
> be aware of programs such as CROP.
>
> All the best,
>
> Louise Marie Hurel
>
> Cybersecurity Project Coordinator | Igarapé Institute
>
> London School of Economics (LSE) Media and Communications (Data and
> Society)
> Skype: louise.dias
> +44 (0) 7468 906327
> *l.h.dias at lse.ac.uk <l.h.dias at lse.ac.uk> *
> louise.marie.hsd at gmail.com
>
>
> 2018-02-26 15:36 GMT-05:00 Michael Karanicolas <mkaranicolas at gmail.com>:
>
> > Hi.
> >
> > Yes - I did. Kathy and myself were the only two applicants. It's a pretty
> > niche meeting, and I don't think there was a lot of interest in
> attending.
> >
> > Mike
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 4:33 PM, hfaiedh ines <hfaiedh.ines2 at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all
> >>
> >> I ll review CROPS shortly and come back to you shortly.
> >>
> >> @Michael, can you please confirm if you received/or not the NCSG Travel
> >> slot to attend the INTA meeting in Seattle? (dating back to Feb 10th)
> >> https://lists.ncsg.is/pipermail/ncsg-ec/2018-February/000293.html
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >>
> >> 2018-02-26 16:51 GMT+01:00 Bruna Martins dos Santos <
> >> bruna.mrtns at gmail.com>:
> >>
> >>> Thanks for the update, Michael! Yep, I guess its both fortunate and
> >>> unfortunate the merger, but I am sure good things can come out of this
> !
> >>>
> >>> 2018-02-26 11:35 GMT-03:00 Michael Karanicolas <mkaranicolas at gmail.com
> >:
> >>>
> >>>> Great. By the way, Bruna, your comment on NCUC participation is well
> >>>> taken, but I've also just today heard back from RightsCon saying they
> >>>> want to merge this session in together with one that's been proposed
> >>>> by Xianhong Hu from UNESCO.
> >>>>
> >>>> On the one hand, this may provide a good boost to attendance, and
> >>>> allow an interesting collaboration opportunity. On the other hand, it
> >>>> obviously reduces our "control" over the session and its participants.
> >>>> Still, I'll try to push for more NCUC involvement. Will go out to the
> >>>> lists with more information shortly.
> >>>>
> >>>> Mike
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 9:53 AM, Renata Aquino Ribeiro
> >>>> <raquino at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> > Dear Bruna, Michael
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Thank you for your comments.
> >>>> > As soon as all EC finalize their comments on proposals we can get
> back
> >>>> > to presenters with the requests and results of evaluation.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Best,
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Renata
> >>>> >
> >>>> > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 10:46 AM, Bruna Martins dos Santos
> >>>> > <bruna.mrtns at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> >> Btw, I approve all three CROP requests but I would like for the LAC
> >>>> and
> >>>> >> Africa ones to have more consistent outreach plans.
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> 2018-02-26 10:45 GMT-03:00 Bruna Martins dos Santos <
> >>>> bruna.mrtns at gmail.com>:
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> Renata, one short clarification: Having read all the proposals
> now I
> >>>> >>> wanted to make clear that I did not object to any of them.
> >>>> >>> I just think we could suggest adaptations to both of them - thats
> >>>> why I
> >>>> >>> had questions with regards to time in the LAC one and outreach in
> >>>> both. If
> >>>> >>> we asked Ayden to better describe outreach plans in his CROP
> >>>> proposal why
> >>>> >>> shouldnt we ask Roxanne and Liz ? I find it necessary to clear up
> >>>> my
> >>>> >>> considerations because (a) I dont think I am going beyond my EC
> >>>> role when I
> >>>> >>> write them and (b) these members will most likely get their CROP
> >>>> requests
> >>>> >>> approved and will get to represent NCUC in a forum so we should
> >>>> raise the
> >>>> >>> bar and make some requirements when it comes to the Constituency
> >>>> >>> representation.
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> One question though: were the Africa and LAC proposals approved to
> >>>> the
> >>>> >>> respective programmes ? You wrote on your email that the LACNIC
> one
> >>>> was in
> >>>> >>> provisional acceptance, what about the Africa one?
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> I would also like all of those who took the time to send the email
> >>>> to the
> >>>> >>> list supporting both proposals taking the time to suggest outreach
> >>>> ideas.
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> Best,
> >>>> >>> B.
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> 2018-02-26 10:18 GMT-03:00 Michael Karanicolas <
> >>>> mkaranicolas at gmail.com>:
> >>>> >>>>
> >>>> >>>> Hi,
> >>>> >>>>
> >>>> >>>> I vote to approve the CROP LAC LACNIC29 + LACNOG and the CROP AF
> -
> >>>> Africa
> >>>> >>>> Internet Summit. Both look good, and I'm pleased that there's
> been
> >>>> such
> >>>> >>>> strong collaboration among the community in developing these
> >>>> proposals.
> >>>> >>>>
> >>>> >>>> Best,
> >>>> >>>>
> >>>> >>>> Michael
> >>>> >>>>
> >>>> >>>> On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 2:18 PM, Renata Aquino Ribeiro
> >>>> >>>> <raquino at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> >>>>>
> >>>> >>>>> Hi
> >>>> >>>>>
> >>>> >>>>> Answers inline.
> >>>> >>>>> Short answer: all proposals were sent both to general list and
> EC
> >>>> list.
> >>>> >>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>
> >>>> >>>>> On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 2:54 PM, Bruna Martins dos Santos
> >>>> >>>>> <bruna.mrtns at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> >>>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>>> My comments are under each CROP
> >>>> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>> CROP AF - Africa Internet Summit
> >>>> >>>>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/2018-February/00880
> >>>> 7.html
> >>>> >>>>>> Sent date 7Feb
> >>>> >>>>>> NCUC Session proposal: to be sent until 2March, sent to
> >>>> NCUC-Discuss
> >>>> >>>>>> and NCUC-EC
> >>>> >>>>>> CROP Proposer: Liz Orembo
> >>>> >>>>>> CROP Status: In evaluation by EC
> >>>> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>> Vote: The applicant doesnt quite describe her outreach plans in
> >>>> her
> >>>> >>>>>> application: " This time I plan to work with the regional
> >>>> engagement teams
> >>>> >>>>>> on ICANN sessions, main focus this time will be on NCUC and its
> >>>> role at
> >>>> >>>>>> ICANN. I'm also planning on sending a presentation proposal.
> >>>> Until 2 March
> >>>> >>>>>> this can be done. I'll try to build this presentation with NCUC
> >>>> members" -
> >>>> >>>>>> this feels a little empty. Also her presentation proposal is
> not
> >>>> listed on
> >>>> >>>>>> the email, was it approved ?
> >>>> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>
> >>>> >>>>> [RAR] I believe when proposer sent this application the details
> >>>> for AIS
> >>>> >>>>> proposal weren't posted yet. Now they have and she did, sent to
> >>>> regional
> >>>> >>>>> list, main list and EC and received no objections. However, lots
> >>>> of
> >>>> >>>>> collaboration in the document
> >>>> >>>>> Proposal document
> >>>> >>>>>
> >>>> >>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-c6tsMtWCxBDHtbFL9OsGy6U
> >>>> uz1rzpx2qpgARR4SQbg/edit
> >>>> >>>>> Discussion on regional list Feb 14
> >>>> >>>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-af/2018-February/00025
> >>>> 6.html
> >>>> >>>>> Proposal on main list Feb 19
> >>>> >>>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/2018-February/
> >>>> 043731.html
> >>>> >>>>> Proposal on EC list Feb 20
> >>>> >>>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/2018-February/00889
> >>>> 7.html
> >>>> >>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>> CROP LAC - LACNIC29 + LACNOG
> >>>> >>>>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/2018-February/00880
> >>>> 6.html
> >>>> >>>>>> Sent date 7Feb
> >>>> >>>>>> NCUC Session proposals: 2
> >>>> >>>>>> NCUC Session proposal status: provisional acceptance
> >>>> >>>>>> CROP Proposer: Roxanne John
> >>>> >>>>>> CROP Status: In evaluation by EC
> >>>> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>> Vote: Yes with conditions! Presentation proposal looks
> >>>> consistent and
> >>>> >>>>>> is very good, apart from that 5 min for 3 speakers looks too
> >>>> little time. On
> >>>> >>>>>> a side note, I would like the applicant to be more active on
> the
> >>>> general
> >>>> >>>>>> presentation and less of a presenter or moderator (the proposal
> >>>> doesnt quite
> >>>> >>>>>> state who will be doing what). I also see no outreach plan such
> >>>> as (a) draft
> >>>> >>>>>> members, (b) participate on discussions on behalf of ncuc or
> any
> >>>> other
> >>>> >>>>>> possibility, the idea of developing outreach with GSE and not
> the
> >>>> >>>>>> constituency also seems a little off - Given that the member is
> >>>> from the LAC
> >>>> >>>>>> region, I would love if she could send her proposal to the list
> >>>> asking for
> >>>> >>>>>> input.
> >>>> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>
> >>>> >>>>> [RAR] Proposals were also sent to list and received comments. I
> am
> >>>> >>>>> co-author of proposals.
> >>>> >>>>> Note that these proposals are only flash talk readouts of
> reports
> >>>> of
> >>>> >>>>> work NCUC did at IGF2017 and will do at WSIS.
> >>>> >>>>> Proposer will indicate, through her readout, what were the
> issues
> >>>> >>>>> discussed by NCUC at these venues and who did that discussion.
> >>>> >>>>> Also there is an idea of remote presentation by key policy
> people
> >>>> in
> >>>> >>>>> NCUC via a short video.
> >>>> >>>>> If the proposal is approved the arrangements for this will be
> >>>> made.
> >>>> >>>>> Proposal document (IGF2017 is the concrete one right now as we
> are
> >>>> >>>>> waiting for WSIS results)
> >>>> >>>>>
> >>>> >>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1iHn-npOfO4Q6WmBP3a5QU3A-
> >>>> rDoGiSaAlh2d5Vcgufo/edit
> >>>> >>>>> Proposal sent to list
> >>>> >>>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/2018-February/
> >>>> 043619.html
> >>>> >>>>> Proposal sent to EC list
> >>>> >>>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/2018-February/00880
> >>>> 6.html
> >>>> >>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>> CROP NA - Rightscon
> >>>> >>>>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/2017-December/00864
> >>>> 3.html
> >>>> >>>>>> Sent date 17 Dec
> >>>> >>>>>> NCUC Session proposal: 1
> >>>> >>>>>> NCUC Session proposal status: Accepted
> >>>> >>>>>> CROP Proposer: Michael Karanicolas
> >>>> >>>>>> CROP Status: In evaluation by EC
> >>>> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>> Vote: Yes! This is the most developed CROP proposal of them all
> >>>> but one
> >>>> >>>>>> point for consideration would be to include other NCUC member
> in
> >>>> attendance
> >>>> >>>>>> both in the Panel composition and in the management of the
> booth
> >>>> - but for
> >>>> >>>>>> this we probably to have wait for the RightsCon funding
> requests
> >>>> to come
> >>>> >>>>>> back.
> >>>> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>> best,
> >>>> >>>>>> b
> >>>> >>>>>> --
> >>>> >>>>>> Bruna Martins dos Santos
> >>>> >>>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>> +55 61 99252-6512
> >>>> >>>>>> Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos
> >>>> >>>>>> @boomartins
> >>>> >>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>
> >>>> >>>>>
> >>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> >>>>> NCUC-EC mailing list
> >>>> >>>>> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
> >>>> >>>>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
> >>>> >>>>>
> >>>> >>>>
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> --
> >>>> >>> Bruna Martins dos Santos
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> +55 61 99252-6512
> >>>> >>> Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos
> >>>> >>> @boomartins
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> --
> >>>> >> Bruna Martins dos Santos
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> +55 61 99252-6512
> >>>> >> Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos
> >>>> >> @boomartins
> >>>> > _______________________________________________
> >>>> > NCUC-EC mailing list
> >>>> > NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
> >>>> > https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> *Bruna Martins dos Santos *
> >>>
> >>> +55 61 99252-6512 <+55%2061%2099252-6512>
> >>> Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos
> >>> @boomartins
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> NCUC-EC mailing list
> >>> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
> >>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > NCUC-EC mailing list
> > NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
> > https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
> >
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/
> 20180228/60f7ea38/attachment.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCUC-EC mailing list
> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of NCUC-EC Digest, Vol 61, Issue 74
> ***************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20180228/7e32a452/attachment.html>
More information about the NCUC-EC
mailing list