[NCUC-EC] announcing ICANN63 travel slot?

[Renata Aquino Ribeiro]

I don't also have time for this anymore

Start an impeachment, do a statement, whatever

I did my job, do yours as you see fit

Em qua, 29 de ago de 2018 15:29, hfaiedh ines <hfaiedh.ines2 at gmail.com>
escreveu:

> Renata
>
> I will not answer (as usual) to the false information you are trying to
> create. Our archives are public, no EC abstained including myself.
>
> Please publicly correct the announcement you falsly made.
>
> Le mercredi 29 août 2018, Elsa S <elsa.saade at gmail.com> a écrit :
> > Renata,
> > I believe that the ask from 4/5 EC is clear. We would like that the
> announcement be corrected as soon as possible.
> > Best,
> > Elsa
> > —
> > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 2:20 PM Renata Aquino Ribeiro <raquino at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Have you even been reading NCUC-EC archives?
> >
> > I've sent Maryam's emails, Mondini's emails, Ozan's emails, Adam Peake's
> >
> > Yes, there are concrete rules on CROP that every constituency should
> > have 3 slots. We got ours yesterday!
> >
> > And I'm trying to put it to use with the pool of candidates that you
> > selected for ICANN63.
> >
> > As to falseness and truth, you could have spoken on your 2nd slot too
> > and you didn't and the deadline is passed.
> >
> > You abstained and that was your choice. Live with it.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 3:05 PM, hfaiedh ines <hfaiedh.ines2 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> Send us a concrete email from staff confirming what you are stating.
> >> The CROP procedures were clarified to us by staff that it is for an
> ICANN or
> >> ICANN related event and all constituencies across ICANN enjoy the same
> >> rights. Either ways, we will await for a confirmation or not on that.
> >>
> >> Now, the issue is not only CROP which was announced to be allocated
> without
> >> a single EC vote.The whole announcement is false including crop and one
> of
> >> the slots, and does not transmit EC decisions and must be publicly
> >> corrected.
> >>
> >>
> >> Le mercredi 29 août 2018, Renata Aquino Ribeiro <raquino at gmail.com> a
> écrit
> >> :
> >>> I don't think you understand the problem here.
> >>>
> >>> Not allocating CROP ICANN63 could mean even not having the other 2 next
> >>> CROPs
> >>>
> >>> We had our plan approved when it was questioned by Mondini
> >>>
> >>> This is highly fragile funding right now
> >>>
> >>> And yes, should the EC wish out of spite, not to allocate to ICANN63
> >>> slot, feel free.
> >>>
> >>> You'll be the ones responsible for also the next 2 and probably CROP
> >>> extinction in the next round.
> >>>
> >>> Best,
> >>>
> >>> Renata
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 2:17 PM, Michael Karanicolas
> >>> <mkaranicolas at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> I agree with this.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 2:12 PM hfaiedh ines <hfaiedh.ines2 at gmail.com
> >
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks.
> >>>>> So no CROP CALL for ICANN63 and no EC votes on CROP means no CROP
> >>>>> ALLOCATION FOR any candidate for ICANN63.
> >>>>> Next leadership will have two CROPs for ICANN64 and ICANN65, in
> addition
> >>>>> to a CROP for an ICANN-related event like GDD etc.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Again, nothing changes the facts.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I kindly and respectfully also ask you to correct the public
> >>>>> announcement
> >>>>> you made.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Le mercredi 29 août 2018, Renata Aquino Ribeiro <raquino at gmail.com>
> a
> >>>>> écrit :
> >>>>> > Calls can not be made with less than 14 business days - Operating
> >>>>> > Procedures
> >>>>> > Also already asked and answered
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 1:53 PM, hfaiedh ines
> >>>>> > <hfaiedh.ines2 at gmail.com>
> >>>>> > wrote:
> >>>>> >> 1. Shahul had majority for the first NCUC Fellowship Slot
> >>>>> >> 2. Dina had only one vote on the second NCUC slot,
> >>>>> >> 3. We had only two ECs thinking out loud, not really voting and
> >>>>> >> oscilliating
> >>>>> >> between Ben and Dina for the second NCUC Slot
> >>>>> >> 4. We do not have any abstain from any EC on the record.
> >>>>> >> 5. We did not have an ICANN63 CROP Call separate from NCUC
> Fellowship
> >>>>> >> so, no
> >>>>> >> call, no applicants, no slot to allocate and more importantly not
> a
> >>>>> >> single
> >>>>> >> EC vote on CROP ICANN63.So no CROP ALLOCATION FROM NCUC FOR
> ICANN63
> >>>>> >> 6. In addition to a procedural issue that myself and Bruna raised
> >>>>> >> concerning
> >>>>> >> the abscence of a call for CROP as other constituencies did, I was
> >>>>> >> happy to
> >>>>> >> learn from Mariam and Tapani that NPOC also has its 3 ICANN or
> ICANN
> >>>>> >> related
> >>>>> >> events CROP.
> >>>>> >> 7.Deadline to send a name is August 31st we are August 29th.
> >>>>> >> 8. The announcement made on ncuc and ncsg members mailing list
> wont
> >>>>> >> change
> >>>>> >> anything to the facts listed above.
> >>>>> >> 9. The public announcement on the travel smot allocations is
> erronous
> >>>>> >> and
> >>>>> >> does not reflect EV decisions.
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >> Le mercredi 29 août 2018, Bruna Martins dos Santos
> >>>>> >> <bruna.mrtns at gmail.com> a
> >>>>> >> écrit :
> >>>>> >>> Hey all,
> >>>>> >>> The reason why the EC is a collegiate group is so that we make
> >>>>> >>> decisions
> >>>>> >>> collectively and provided the input from our peers. Whenever we
> >>>>> >>> approach
> >>>>> >>> debates assuming external factors such as "backchannel lobbying"
> we
> >>>>> >>> are not
> >>>>> >>> only demeaning the group but also our peers capability of making
> a
> >>>>> >>> decision
> >>>>> >>> on their own, and this should never be the case.
> >>>>> >>>
> >>>>> >>> Since the beginning we have approached debates and tallys in a
> very
> >>>>> >>> respectful manner and also observing our bylaws. If in some cases
> >>>>> >>> our
> >>>>> >>> EC
> >>>>> >>> members did not get the chance to respond to an vote or weigh in
> a
> >>>>> >>> subject,
> >>>>> >>> consensus calls for the majority's will - if we had followed
> that MO
> >>>>> >>> Dina
> >>>>> >>> should have had the funding instead of the CROP given that
> Michael
> >>>>> >>> had
> >>>>> >>> voted
> >>>>> >>> for her. What bothers me about this specific situation, other
> than
> >>>>> >>> the
> >>>>> >>> personal attacks - a question suffered by some or all of us
> >>>>> >>> previously
> >>>>> >>> and
> >>>>> >>> that we tried to address as a collegiate -, is that we gave a
> CROP
> >>>>> >>> without a
> >>>>> >>> call or even a mention of an allocation possibility that was
> >>>>> >>> initially
> >>>>> >>> directed to NCUC without going evaluating any CROP outreach plans
> >>>>> >>> from
> >>>>> >>> the
> >>>>> >>> selected member. Had we announced that and I am pretty sure of
> other
> >>>>> >>> members
> >>>>> >>> that could have possibly applied for this specific slot - as I
> >>>>> >>> highlighted
> >>>>> >>> in previous emails.
> >>>>> >>>
> >>>>> >>> As to the CROP slot deadline, there was never a clear
> understanding
> >>>>> >>> on
> >>>>> >>> whether or not filling slot today or lets say in november would
> >>>>> >>> imply
> >>>>> >>> on
> >>>>> >>> NCUC losing it. What would be lost if there wasnt any
> announcements
> >>>>> >>> today
> >>>>> >>> was the opportunity of using this crop slot for the barcelona
> >>>>> >>> meeting,
> >>>>> >>> and
> >>>>> >>> not the slot per se.
> >>>>> >>> I really wish we had more conversations about this specific issue
> >>>>> >>> instead
> >>>>> >>> of arriving at this situation we find ourselves at rn.
> >>>>> >>> Em qua, 29 de ago de 2018 às 13:40, Elsa S <elsa.saade at gmail.com
> >
> >>>>> >>> escreveu:
> >>>>> >>>>
> >>>>> >>>> Hi Renata,
> >>>>> >>>> I have all the right to abstain when I sense that I would be
> making
> >>>>> >>>> a
> >>>>> >>>> decision without a proper base. I did not abstain this time
> though,
> >>>>> >>>> I
> >>>>> >>>> rather
> >>>>> >>>> waited, keepig an eye out for any deliberations that could
> affect
> >>>>> >>>> how
> >>>>> >>>> to
> >>>>> >>>> weigh in NPOC Chair’s recommendation for instance. I understand
> >>>>> >>>> there
> >>>>> >>>> was a
> >>>>> >>>> deadline, but I will never make a decision when I’m not entirely
> >>>>> >>>> sure
> >>>>> >>>> based
> >>>>> >>>> on what I would be making it. And I have the right as well as
> the
> >>>>> >>>> responsibility to do so.
> >>>>> >>>> As for conflict of interest, I still haven’t taken up the role
> of
> >>>>> >>>> GNSO
> >>>>> >>>> Councilor, as mentioned several times, I am still acting as
> NCUC EC
> >>>>> >>>> AP until
> >>>>> >>>> Barcelona. This was made clear in so many different exchanges
> both
> >>>>> >>>> formally
> >>>>> >>>> and informally. Just FYI, I haven’t even been added to the GNSO
> >>>>> >>>> Council
> >>>>> >>>> mailing list as a councelor nor have I had handover, the only
> >>>>> >>>> exchange that
> >>>>> >>>> was made relating to this position was mitigating my presence in
> >>>>> >>>> Barcelona
> >>>>> >>>> for the start of my Councilor role. To have to justify this to
> you,
> >>>>> >>>> is quite
> >>>>> >>>> surprising to me.
> >>>>> >>>> In any case, this thread is aimed to speak about a specific
> issue,
> >>>>> >>>> and
> >>>>> >>>> tackling the fact that on the list, it will seem like the EC
> >>>>> >>>> actually
> >>>>> >>>> made a
> >>>>> >>>> final clear cut decision about the allocations, when we actually
> >>>>> >>>> did
> >>>>> >>>> not
> >>>>> >>>> entirely do that. Let us refrain from opening side discussions
> that
> >>>>> >>>> I
> >>>>> >>>> would
> >>>>> >>>> tackle on a different thread.
> >>>>> >>>> Best,
> >>>>> >>>> Elsa
> >>>>> >>>> —
> >>>>> >>>> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 12:28 PM Renata Aquino Ribeiro
> >>>>> >>>> <raquino at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>> >>>>> Elsa,
> >>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>> >>>>> You abstained on your 2nd vote and the deadline passed.
> >>>>> >>>>> In fact, you always abstain on difficult decisions.
> >>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>> >>>>> Right now, you are also omitting the conflict of interest of
> being
> >>>>> >>>>> EC
> >>>>> >>>>> AP and GNSO Councillor, which I have asked you time and time
> again
> >>>>> >>>>> privately to address on the main NCUC list.
> >>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>> >>>>> Please do it so
> >>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks
> >>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>> >>>>>
> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 1:01 PM, Elsa S <elsa.saade at gmail.com>
> >>>>> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>> >>>>> > Im honestly out of words as to the way this has unfolded. To
> >>>>> >>>>> > start
> >>>>> >>>>> > with the
> >>>>> >>>>> > exchange between Farzi and Renata where it was implied that
> we
> >>>>> >>>>> > were
> >>>>> >>>>> > being
> >>>>> >>>>> > manipulated into making a decision, to eventually making a
> >>>>> >>>>> > choice
> >>>>> >>>>> > for
> >>>>> >>>>> > the EC
> >>>>> >>>>> > due to the deadline. I do understand that there was a
> deadline
> >>>>> >>>>> > and
> >>>>> >>>>> > staff
> >>>>> >>>>> > would be out for a longer time than we can afford, however, I
> >>>>> >>>>> > personally saw
> >>>>> >>>>> > a lot of potential in other candidates that I would have
> voted
> >>>>> >>>>> > for, if
> >>>>> >>>>> > there
> >>>>> >>>>> > wasn’t so much confusion on how to weigh in, with the
> different
> >>>>> >>>>> > lobbying
> >>>>> >>>>> > from all sides. I’m not sure as to what kind of standard we
> will
> >>>>> >>>>> > be
> >>>>> >>>>> > handing
> >>>>> >>>>> > over to the next EC. And it would be risky to just handover
> the
> >>>>> >>>>> > way we
> >>>>> >>>>> > dealt
> >>>>> >>>>> > with these allocations as is.
> >>>>> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >>>>> > Since the news is out, there isn’t much that can be done. But
> >>>>> >>>>> > for
> >>>>> >>>>> > the
> >>>>> >>>>> > record, I believe there should be more trust in the EC’s
> >>>>> >>>>> > capability of
> >>>>> >>>>> > making a decision on their own without fear of interferance
> or
> >>>>> >>>>> > ‘manipulation’, and there should be more of a comprehensive
> >>>>> >>>>> > strategy
> >>>>> >>>>> > when it
> >>>>> >>>>> > comes to choosing candidates. Where are the newcomers in this
> >>>>> >>>>> > batch of
> >>>>> >>>>> > chosen candidates for instance? What’s the outcome of having
> >>>>> >>>>> > them
> >>>>> >>>>> > at
> >>>>> >>>>> > ICANN63
> >>>>> >>>>> > for us all? Is it serving the aim of policy development or
> not?
> >>>>> >>>>> > Of
> >>>>> >>>>> > outreach?
> >>>>> >>>>> > Of welcoming new faces? Of proper funding allocation?
> >>>>> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >>>>> > My two cents here.
> >>>>> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >>>>> > E.
> >>>>> >>>>> > —
> >>>>> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >>>>> > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 11:49 AM Renata Aquino Ribeiro
> >>>>> >>>>> > <raquino at gmail.com>
> >>>>> >>>>> > wrote:
> >>>>> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> Dear EC
> >>>>> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> I am sorry but you missed the deadline for announcement for
> 2
> >>>>> >>>>> >> days
> >>>>> >>>>> >> already.
> >>>>> >>>>> >> And yes, I did mention that we would very likely lose CROP
> >>>>> >>>>> >> ICANN63
> >>>>> >>>>> >> date if we don't use, as the recent reminder of Ozan
> implies.
> >>>>> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> We are already losing 9000USD on website management funding
> >>>>> >>>>> >> because
> >>>>> >>>>> >> the EC did not come up with any contribution on this.
> >>>>> >>>>> >> We discovered we had this funding in August and it is very
> >>>>> >>>>> >> likely
> >>>>> >>>>> >> the
> >>>>> >>>>> >> new Chair may not be able to tap into it.
> >>>>> >>>>> >> I haven't been able to address small suggestions to it.
> >>>>> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> So we need to be more fiscally responsible to NCUC as well
> as
> >>>>> >>>>> >> respecting our Operating Procedures.
> >>>>> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> There is no time for  a call for ICANN63, we were
> questioned 2
> >>>>> >>>>> >> days
> >>>>> >>>>> >> ago, our staff is out until 10Sept.
> >>>>> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> I understand the pressure on you but squandering funding is
> the
> >>>>> >>>>> >> worst
> >>>>> >>>>> >> you can do.
> >>>>> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> Best,
> >>>>> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> Renata
> >>>>> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 12:35 PM, Michael Karanicolas
> >>>>> >>>>> >> <mkaranicolas at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> >>>>> >> > I also don't understand this course of action. As I
> >>>>> >>>>> >> > understand
> >>>>> >>>>> >> > it,
> >>>>> >>>>> >> > we
> >>>>> >>>>> >> > were
> >>>>> >>>>> >> > deliberating the travel slots - and all that remained was
> to
> >>>>> >>>>> >> > decide
> >>>>> >>>>> >> > between
> >>>>> >>>>> >> > Ben or Dina. Nobody has suggested allocating the CROP
> and, as
> >>>>> >>>>> >> > Bruna
> >>>>> >>>>> >> > says, we
> >>>>> >>>>> >> > haven't done a proper call.
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >
> >>>>> >>>>> >> > I would suggest the Chair hold back on this, and we ask
> the
> >>>>> >>>>> >> > EC
> >>>>> >>>>> >> > folks who
> >>>>> >>>>> >> > voted for Ben OR Dina to just pick one or the other, with
> a
> >>>>> >>>>> >> > deadline of
> >>>>> >>>>> >> > COB
> >>>>> >>>>> >> > today.
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >
> >>>>> >>>>> >> > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 12:29 PM Renata Aquino Ribeiro
> >>>>> >>>>> >> > <raquino at gmail.com>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> > wrote:
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> Dear Bruna
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> Unfortunately I have time and time again given the EC the
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> opportunity
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> to participate on the CROP Outreach Plan, on the
> deadline to
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> ICANN63
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> and on the weighing in on solutions.
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> I'm sorry you oppose now but we are out of options
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> Best,
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> Renata
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 12:23 PM, Bruna Martins dos
> Santos
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> <bruna.mrtns at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> > We did not open a call for this one and it will raise
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> > questions
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> > in
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> > our
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> > membership as to why we gave it to Dina once this was
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> > never
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> > announced
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> > to
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> > the
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> > larger list. And also, I dont believe that there is
> such
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> > thing
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> > as an
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> > interpretation that if we dont use this crop NOW we
> are to
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> > lose,
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> > given
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> > that
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> > the three slots shall be used until the end of FY19.
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> > Em qua, 29 de ago de 2018 às 12:18, Bruna Martins dos
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> > Santos
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> > <bruna.mrtns at gmail.com> escreveu:
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >> Dear Renata,
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >> I am sorry but I oppose this idea. We were not
> discussing
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >> CROP,
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >> we
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >> were
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >> discussing travel support.
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >> Em qua, 29 de ago de 2018 às 12:17, Renata Aquino
> Ribeiro
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >> <raquino at gmail.com> escreveu:
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> Dear all
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> We should have announced this on the 27aug
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> We also have the CROP ICANN63 slot to an EU NCUC
> member
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> We just received a reminder today to use it, at the
> risk
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> of
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> losing
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> it
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> I have read all the emails and I'll do the following
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> Travel Support - 1st slot
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> Shahul Hameed
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> Travel Support - 2nd slot
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> Benjamin Akinmoyeje
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> CROP ICANN63
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> I'll work with Dina Thomas on a NCUC CROP outreach
> plan
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> and
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> send it
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> to
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> the EC and to the CROP staff.
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> Best,
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> Renata
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 10:22 AM, Bruna Martins dos
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> Santos
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> <bruna.mrtns at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > Dear All,
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > I believe that according the advice provided by
> Farzi
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > we
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > still
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > have
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > this
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > year to decide whether or not we are using this
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > support
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > exclusively
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > to
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > NCUC
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > members or if we are opening the selection to NPOC
> and
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > NCSG
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > as
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > well
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > -
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > as we
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > did in this one - but as this selection is still
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > subjected
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > to
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > NCUC
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > EC I
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > believe that we should continue to perform by
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > selecting
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > the
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > funded
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > members
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > based on the quality of their outreach plans and
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > application
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > independently
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > of the approach we seek to follow - opening calls
> or
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > using
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > them
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > for
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > NCUC
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > only.
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > In that sense, I am also between Dina and Ben.
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > Dina provided a good application and is also
> supported
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > by
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > NPOC
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > Leadership,
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > but I agree with Louise on the "her application
> might
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > have
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > benefitted
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > from a
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > more concrete outline of how she has been working
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > within
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > PDPs -
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > or
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > tying PDP
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > experience as an observer with her policy
> writing". I
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > very
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > much
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > appreciate
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > Dina's efforts regarding the Policy writing ad-hoc
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > group
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > she
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > tried
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > to
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > assemble, but I did not see it moving forward (and
> am
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > not
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > implying
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > it
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > is her
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > fault either).
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > On the other hand, we have Ben who we approved on a
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > previous
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > call
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > and
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > due to
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > personal reasons was not able to attend the
> meeting.
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > Ben
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > is
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > has
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > been
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > involved in the RDS and the RPMs working group and
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > while
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > we
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > thought
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > that the
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > Policy meeting would be a moment for him to make
> sense
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > of
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > what
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > has
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > been
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > discussed in the calls, he was not able to attend.
> If
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > I
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > am
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > not
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > mistaken,
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > when we chatted about his situation in PR, and the
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > idea
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > of
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > re-considering
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > him for the subsequent call was at the table.
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > Given that I am very on the fence about the
> selection
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > of
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > the
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > second
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > candidate, and that the two candidates are from EU
> and
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > AF, I
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > would
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > be
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > more
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > than happy to follow the advice from our EU and AF
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > representatives.
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > And please, lets decide soon on this matter, the
> more
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > we
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > delay
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > the
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > decision
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > the harder it becomes to our funded members to find
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > tickets
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > within
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > the
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > price
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > range. Barcelona is in less than two months!
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > best,
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > B.
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > Em ter, 28 de ago de 2018 às 10:15, Louise Marie
> Hurel
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > <louise.marie.hsd at gmail.com> escreveu:
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> Dear all,
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> First, I'd like to kindly thank Joan for her
> inputs.
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> Second, I cast my first vote to Shahul. As my
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> colleagues
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> have
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> already
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> highlighted, he has been actively engaging in
> policy
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> writing and
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> shows
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> promising development within our community -- he
> has
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> shown
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> consistent
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> commitment and dedication. His application was
> clear,
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> consistent
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> and
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> grounded. I think he would also benefit greatly
> from
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> the
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> opportunity
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> to
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> participate on-site and hopefully lay deeper
> grounds
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> for
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> further
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> engagement
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> within the NCUC.
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> Quite frankly, my second vote goes to either
> Benjamin
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> or
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> Dina.
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> Let
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> me
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> take
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> a few lines to explain why - given NPOC Chair's
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> support
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> for
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> Dina. I
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> have had
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> the opportunity to work with her in the past two
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> meetings
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> at the
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> onboarding
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> program. She is committed and has engaged in
> drafting
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> comments -
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> a
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> strong
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> applicant. Although her application might have
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> benefitted
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> from a
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> more
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> concrete outline of how she has been working
> within
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> PDPs -
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> or
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> tying
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> PDP
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> experience as an observer with her policy writing
> (a
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> general way
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> of
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> gaining
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> insights and perspectives from other stakeholder
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> groups
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> and/or
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> maturity in
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> navigating ICANN). On the other hand, I also think
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> that
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> we
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> need
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> to
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> give
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> space for new applicants, and that includes giving
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> Ben
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> an
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> opportunity,
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> as he
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> has, unfortunately, not been able to attend the
> last
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> meeting due
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> to
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> visa
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> issues. He also submitted a good application,
> clearly
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> demonstrating
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> consistency in participating and following two
> PDPs
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> and
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> looking
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> for
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> mentorship. My only question here is that while he
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> states
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> that
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> he
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> would do
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> his best to "keep along with the ICANN63 sessions
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> especially
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> those
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> that
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> concern the NCUC and NCSG" he didn't explain how
> the
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> slot
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> would
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> also
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> play
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> into his volunteer work on NPOC's PC, in
> particular.
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> I
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> think
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> that
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> this
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> might
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> have been an opportunity for him to provide a more
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> robust
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> account
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> of a
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> grounded plan for engagement in this next meeting.
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> As observed, I outlined both the pros and cons of
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> their
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> applications.
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> I
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> don't think there's a clear shot here and thus
> count
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> on
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> my
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> peers
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> to
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> either
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> provide further insights to their decision that
> might
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> aid
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> in the
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> allocation
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> of this slot or, rely on a majority of voters for
> one
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> or
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> the
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> other.
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> Hope this provides a fair account of my decision.
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> Kind regards,
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> Louise Marie Hurel
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> Cybersecurity Project Coordinator | Igarapé
> Institute
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> London School of Economics (LSE) Media and
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> Communications
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> (Data
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> and
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> Society)
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> Skype: louise.dias
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> +44 (0) 7468 906327
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> l.h.dias at lse.ac.uk
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> louise.marie.hsd at gmail.com
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 at 18:43, Renata Aquino
> Ribeiro
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> <raquino at gmail.com>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> wrote:
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> Thank you Joan for your clarification.
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 2:41 PM, Joan Kerr
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> <joankerr at fbsc.org>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> wrote:
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > Hi Renata, All
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > NPOC is supporting Dina for a number of
> reasons.
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > She
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > has
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > been
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > working
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > hard
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > with the newly formed PC and has a lot of
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > experience
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > in
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > policy
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > and
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > processes.  NPOC feels Dina is the right choice
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > and
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > will
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > be
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > instrumental in
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > assisting with the policy going forward.
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > Thanks,
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 1:23 PM Renata Aquino
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > Ribeiro
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > <raquino at gmail.com>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > wrote:
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> Dear Joan
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> Please see inquiry from one of the NCUC EC
> reps.
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 1:47 PM, Bruna Martins
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> dos
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> Santos
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> <bruna.mrtns at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > Dear all,
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > My first vote went to Shahul, and as I am
> still
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > to
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > decide
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > who
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > will
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > get
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > the
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > second slot Im more prone to vote either o
> Ben
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > or
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > Farell,
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > who
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > is
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > also a
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > NPOC
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > member I believe.
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > Renata, do you think that would be the case
> for
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > asking
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > Joan
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > whether
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > or
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > not
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > she'd recommend a second name since Remmy
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > withdrew
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > his
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > candidacy
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > ?
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > best,
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > B.
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > Em dom, 26 de ago de 2018 às 21:59, Renata
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > Aquino
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > Ribeiro
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > <raquino at gmail.com> escreveu:
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> Dear EC
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> It is time to announce the ICANN63 travel
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> slots.
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> Please decide soon.
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> Thanks
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>
> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> NCUC-EC mailing list
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >>
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > --
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > Bruna Martins dos Santos
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >> > @boomartins
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > --
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > Joan Kerr,
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > Entrepreneur, Artist, Humanitarian
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > T: +1 (416) 907-0783
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > Skype: joankerr_fbsc
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > fbsc.org, www.fbsc.eco
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > Chair: Victory Garden Leadership Implementation
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > Team
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > Chair, Sustainable Agriculture, Global
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > Humanitarian
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > Technology
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > Conference
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > Chair: IEEE Smart Villages Project, Sustainable
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > Agriculture
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > Working
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > Group
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > Chair: ICANN Not for Profit Operational
> Concerns
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > Constituency
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > Recipient of the United Nations Civil Society
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > Award
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > (WSIS
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > 2004)
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > Recipient, Region of Durham Community
> Partnership
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > Award
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > Advisor, IEEE Humanitarian Initiatives
> Committee
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> >
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > Advisor, Climate Smart Agriculture Youth
> Network,
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > (CSAYN)
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > Global
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> > Coordination Unit
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> NCUC-EC mailing list
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>>
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> NCUC-EC mailing list
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >>
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > --
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > Bruna Martins dos Santos
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> >
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>> > @boomartins
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >> --
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >> Bruna Martins dos Santos
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >>
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >> Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >> @boomartins
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> > --
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> > Bruna Martins dos Santos
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> > Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> > @boomartins
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> NCUC-EC mailing list
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
> >>>>> >>>>> >> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> >>>>> >> NCUC-EC mailing list
> >>>>> >>>>> >> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
> >>>>> >>>>> >> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
> >>>>> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >>>>> > --
> >>>>> >>>>> > --
> >>>>> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >>>>> > Elsa Saade
> >>>>> >>>>> > Consultant
> >>>>> >>>>> > Gulf Centre for H
> >
> > --
> > --
> >
> > Elsa Saade
> > Consultant
> > Gulf Centre for Human Rights
> > Twitter: @Elsa_Saade
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20180829/776dbd1c/attachment.html>