[NCUC-EC] announcing ICANN63 travel slot?

Wed Aug 29 17:23:50 CEST 2018

We did not open a call for this one and it will raise questions in our
membership as to why we gave it to Dina once this was never announced to
the larger list. And also, I dont believe that there is such thing as an
interpretation that if we dont use this crop NOW we are to lose, given that
the three slots shall be used until the end of FY19.

Em qua, 29 de ago de 2018 às 12:18, Bruna Martins dos Santos <
bruna.mrtns at gmail.com> escreveu:

> Dear Renata,
>
> I am sorry but I oppose this idea. We were not discussing CROP, we were
> discussing travel support.
>
>
>
> Em qua, 29 de ago de 2018 às 12:17, Renata Aquino Ribeiro <
> raquino at gmail.com> escreveu:
>
>> Dear all
>>
>> We should have announced this on the 27aug
>>
>> We also have the CROP ICANN63 slot to an EU NCUC member
>>
>> We just received a reminder today to use it, at the risk of losing it
>>
>> I have read all the emails and I'll do the following
>>
>> Travel Support - 1st slot
>> Shahul Hameed
>>
>> Travel Support - 2nd slot
>> Benjamin Akinmoyeje
>>
>> CROP ICANN63
>> I'll work with Dina Thomas on a NCUC CROP outreach plan and send it to
>> the EC and to the CROP staff.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Renata
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 10:22 AM, Bruna Martins dos Santos
>> <bruna.mrtns at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Dear All,
>> >
>> > I believe that according the advice provided by Farzi we still have this
>> > year to decide whether or not we are using this support exclusively to
>> NCUC
>> > members or if we are opening the selection to NPOC and NCSG as well -
>> as we
>> > did in this one - but as this selection is still subjected to NCUC EC I
>> > believe that we should continue to perform by selecting the funded
>> members
>> > based on the quality of their outreach plans and application
>> independently
>> > of the approach we seek to follow - opening calls or using them for NCUC
>> > only.
>> >
>> > In that sense, I am also between Dina and Ben.
>> >
>> > Dina provided a good application and is also supported by NPOC
>> Leadership,
>> > but I agree with Louise on the "her application might have benefitted
>> from a
>> > more concrete outline of how she has been working within PDPs - or
>> tying PDP
>> > experience as an observer with her policy writing". I very much
>> appreciate
>> > Dina's efforts regarding the Policy writing ad-hoc group she tried to
>> > assemble, but I did not see it moving forward (and am not implying it
>> is her
>> > fault either).
>> >
>> > On the other hand, we have Ben who we approved on a previous call and
>> due to
>> > personal reasons was not able to attend the meeting. Ben is has been
>> > involved in the RDS and the RPMs working group and while we thought
>> that the
>> > Policy meeting would be a moment for him to make sense of what has been
>> > discussed in the calls, he was not able to attend. If I am not mistaken,
>> > when we chatted about his situation in PR, and the idea of
>> re-considering
>> > him for the subsequent call was at the table.
>> >
>> > Given that I am very on the fence about the selection of the second
>> > candidate, and that the two candidates are from EU and AF, I would be
>> more
>> > than happy to follow the advice from our EU and AF representatives.
>> >
>> > And please, lets decide soon on this matter, the more we delay the
>> decision
>> > the harder it becomes to our funded members to find tickets within the
>> price
>> > range. Barcelona is in less than two months!
>> >
>> > best,
>> > B.
>> >
>> > Em ter, 28 de ago de 2018 às 10:15, Louise Marie Hurel
>> > <louise.marie.hsd at gmail.com> escreveu:
>> >>
>> >> Dear all,
>> >>
>> >> First, I'd like to kindly thank Joan for her inputs.
>> >>
>> >> Second, I cast my first vote to Shahul. As my colleagues have already
>> >> highlighted, he has been actively engaging in policy writing and shows
>> >> promising development within our community -- he has shown consistent
>> >> commitment and dedication. His application was clear, consistent and
>> >> grounded. I think he would also benefit greatly from the opportunity to
>> >> participate on-site and hopefully lay deeper grounds for further
>> engagement
>> >> within the NCUC.
>> >>
>> >> Quite frankly, my second vote goes to either Benjamin or Dina. Let me
>> take
>> >> a few lines to explain why - given NPOC Chair's support for Dina. I
>> have had
>> >> the opportunity to work with her in the past two meetings at the
>> onboarding
>> >> program. She is committed and has engaged in drafting comments - a
>> strong
>> >> applicant. Although her application might have benefitted from a more
>> >> concrete outline of how she has been working within PDPs - or tying PDP
>> >> experience as an observer with her policy writing (a general way of
>> gaining
>> >> insights and perspectives from other stakeholder groups and/or
>> maturity in
>> >> navigating ICANN). On the other hand, I also think that we need to give
>> >> space for new applicants, and that includes giving Ben an opportunity,
>> as he
>> >> has, unfortunately, not been able to attend the last meeting due to
>> visa
>> >> issues. He also submitted a good application, clearly demonstrating
>> >> consistency in participating and following two PDPs and looking for
>> >> mentorship. My only question here is that while he states that he
>> would do
>> >> his best to "keep along with the ICANN63 sessions especially those that
>> >> concern the NCUC and NCSG" he didn't explain how the slot would also
>> play
>> >> into his volunteer work on NPOC's PC, in particular. I think that this
>> might
>> >> have been an opportunity for him to provide a more robust account of a
>> >> grounded plan for engagement in this next meeting.
>> >>
>> >> As observed, I outlined both the pros and cons of their applications. I
>> >> don't think there's a clear shot here and thus count on my peers to
>> either
>> >> provide further insights to their decision that might aid in the
>> allocation
>> >> of this slot or, rely on a majority of voters for one or the other.
>> >>
>> >> Hope this provides a fair account of my decision.
>> >>
>> >> Kind regards,
>> >>
>> >> Louise Marie Hurel
>> >>
>> >> Cybersecurity Project Coordinator | Igarapé Institute
>> >>
>> >> London School of Economics (LSE) Media and Communications (Data and
>> >> Society)
>> >>
>> >> Skype: louise.dias
>> >> +44 (0) 7468 906327
>> >> l.h.dias at lse.ac.uk
>> >> louise.marie.hsd at gmail.com
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 at 18:43, Renata Aquino Ribeiro <raquino at gmail.com
>> >
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Thank you Joan for your clarification.
>> >>>
>> >>> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 2:41 PM, Joan Kerr <joankerr at fbsc.org> wrote:
>> >>> > Hi Renata, All
>> >>> >
>> >>> > NPOC is supporting Dina for a number of reasons.  She has been
>> working
>> >>> > hard
>> >>> > with the newly formed PC and has a lot of experience in policy and
>> >>> > processes.  NPOC feels Dina is the right choice and will be
>> >>> > instrumental in
>> >>> > assisting with the policy going forward.
>> >>> > Thanks,
>> >>> >
>> >>> > On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 1:23 PM Renata Aquino Ribeiro
>> >>> > <raquino at gmail.com>
>> >>> > wrote:
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Dear Joan
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Please see inquiry from one of the NCUC EC reps.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 1:47 PM, Bruna Martins dos Santos
>> >>> >> <bruna.mrtns at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> >> > Dear all,
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > My first vote went to Shahul, and as I am still to decide who
>> will
>> >>> >> > get
>> >>> >> > the
>> >>> >> > second slot Im more prone to vote either o Ben or Farell, who is
>> >>> >> > also a
>> >>> >> > NPOC
>> >>> >> > member I believe.
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > Renata, do you think that would be the case for asking Joan
>> whether
>> >>> >> > or
>> >>> >> > not
>> >>> >> > she'd recommend a second name since Remmy withdrew his candidacy
>> ?
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > best,
>> >>> >> > B.
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > Em dom, 26 de ago de 2018 às 21:59, Renata Aquino Ribeiro
>> >>> >> > <raquino at gmail.com> escreveu:
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> Dear EC
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> It is time to announce the ICANN63 travel slots.
>> >>> >> >> Please decide soon.
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> Thanks
>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >>> >> >> NCUC-EC mailing list
>> >>> >> >> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>> >>> >> >> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > --
>> >>> >> > Bruna Martins dos Santos
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos
>> >>> >> > @boomartins
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > --
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Joan Kerr,
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Entrepreneur, Artist, Humanitarian
>> >>> >
>> >>> > T: +1 (416) 907-0783
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Skype: joankerr_fbsc
>> >>> >
>> >>> > fbsc.org, www.fbsc.eco
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Chair: Victory Garden Leadership Implementation Team
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Chair, Sustainable Agriculture, Global Humanitarian Technology
>> >>> > Conference
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Chair: IEEE Smart Villages Project, Sustainable Agriculture Working
>> >>> > Group
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Chair: ICANN Not for Profit Operational Concerns Constituency
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Recipient of the United Nations Civil Society Award (WSIS 2004)
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Recipient, Region of Durham Community Partnership Award
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Advisor, IEEE Humanitarian Initiatives Committee
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Advisor, Climate Smart Agriculture Youth Network, (CSAYN) Global
>> >>> > Coordination Unit
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> NCUC-EC mailing list
>> >>> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>> >>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> NCUC-EC mailing list
>> >> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>> >> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Bruna Martins dos Santos
>> >
>> > Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos
>> > @boomartins
>>
>
>
> --
> *Bruna Martins dos Santos *
>
> Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos
> @boomartins
>

-- 
*Bruna Martins dos Santos *

Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos
@boomartins
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20180829/da327889/attachment.html>