[NCUC-EC] NCUC mentees for ICANN62 - Deliberate until 26Apr

[Bruna Martins dos Santos]

Dear EC and Renata,

Should we push for an extension ? Given that this is the first LAC meeting
in years, I would like to at least try to reach out to some members from
the region so see if they would apply. Also, we could also re-run the call
in our lists to see if we manage to get more female applicants.

What do you say ??

best,
Bruna

2018-04-18 10:57 GMT-03:00 hfaiedh ines <hfaiedh.ines2 at gmail.com>:

> Dear colleagues,
>
> I finished reviewing the applications for the ICANN62 NCUC Fellowship.
>
> First, I would like to thank all those who applied for this opportunity
> and I congratulate them for their impressive work and curriculum.
>
> Second,  I would suggest that, for next rounds when we issue a call for
> applications, we also add a short section on "eligibility criteria to apply
> for the fellowship" instead of the link as it seems some applicants did not
> consult our travel policy, https://www.ncuc.org/
> get-involved/travel-policy/
>
> *Eligibility Criteria*
>
> To receive travel support, applicants must be NCUC members in good
> standing who:
>
>    1. Voted in the previous year’s NCUC election, if eligible at the time;
>    2. Are actively and verifiably engaged in NCUC’s work, for example,
>    constituency governance, NCUC/NCSG policy discussions, or GNSO or
>    cross-community working groups;
>    3. Need to be at a given meeting because the above-mentioned work will
>    be advanced there;
>    4. Agree to participate in any NCUC, NCSG and GNSO meetings held
>    during the meeting;
>    5. Agree to write a brief post-trip blog post for the NCUC website
>    reflecting on the meeting’s main developments of relevance to NCUC;
>    6. Did not receive NCUC funding to attend the immediately previous
>    ICANN meeting, unless exceptional circumstances require their presence at
>    two consecutive meetings. (Note: this criteria only applies to regular
>    ICANN meetings, as below)
>    7. Agree to make their own travel, accommodation, visa, and related
>    arrangements and be reimbursed after the trip. NCUC cannot provide funds in
>    advance of meetings or any administrative support.
>
> Third, I would suggest that the applicants we select for this round or the
> next ones, commit to take part in the NCUC buddy/mentor program and work on
> a topic/issue/project with their mentor to present at ICANN62.
>
> Fourth, I suggest for next rounds we advertize more about the Buddy
> program and clearly state that it is one of the conditions or adds to the
> scoring of an application.
>
> That said, and since the goal is to give a chance to two mentees to get
> more active and learn about NCUC, I would support the application of Ziyam
> Abdeen and Houda Chihi, and having their commitment to the Buddy/mentee
>  program as I explained on the third point.
>
> Best of luck to all.
>
>
>
> 2018-04-17 14:56 GMT+00:00 Renata Aquino Ribeiro <raquino at gmail.com>:
>
>> Dear EC
>>
>> This specific member process is something we can ask staff to check w/
>> NCSG.
>> The NCSG EC approves members, not NCUC.
>>
>> If the majority of EC wants to consider this application, we have to
>> have this conversation of member approval with NCSG EC. It hasn't been
>> done before that I know of but it is up to you to ask.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Renata
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 10:57 AM, Michael Karanicolas
>> <mkaranicolas at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Ok. Do we know when she applied? Sorry to push on this, but I wouldn't
>> want
>> > to penalize her for delays in processing on our end.
>> >
>> > I think as long as she's applied, we should consider her application,
>> > particularly since these are mentee slots, so we should be aiming at
>> people
>> > who are relatively new anyway.
>> >
>> > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 9:41 AM, Renata Aquino Ribeiro <
>> raquino at gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Yes, Michael, anyone who wants to be a member goes through NCSG EC
>> >> vetting and that hasn't happened for her yet, apparently.
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 9:36 AM, Michael Karanicolas
>> >> <mkaranicolas at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > Hi,
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks for sending along. Can I ask for clarification on our
>> criteria,
>> >> > and
>> >> > why Ioana doesn't qualify? Are you saying she is not formally a
>> member
>> >> > of
>> >> > NCUC yet?
>> >> >
>> >> > Best,
>> >> >
>> >> > Michael
>> >> >
>> >> > On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 8:47 PM, Renata Aquino Ribeiro
>> >> > <raquino at gmail.com>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Dear EC
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Here are the candidates for ICANN62
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1UsX0KXwhT6cimbpUWYdz
>> Ls01G5FTHHADHhdLkcZ1Yos/edit?usp=sharing
>> >> >>
>> >> >> We had also the candidacy of Ioana S. who is still a candidate to
>> be a
>> >> >> member so not in accordance to criteria.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Please vote asap or send in your comments
>> >> >>
>> >> >> We must announce results by the 27th or earliest
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thank you
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Best,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Renata
>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> >> NCUC-EC mailing list
>> >> >> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>> >> >> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCUC-EC mailing list
>> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCUC-EC mailing list
> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>
>


-- 
*Bruna Martins dos Santos *

+55 61 99252-6512
Skype ID: bruna.martinsantos
@boomartins
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20180418/dd2bd7bd/attachment.html>