[NCUC-EC] Fwd: Constituency Review questionnaire

[farzaneh badii]

Hi Anna,

Do we have a google doc now on this? we can cite both new and old bylaws.

Farzaneh

On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 8:29 AM, Anna Loup <loupac5556 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> I am working on a set of preliminary answers right now. Once I have
> internet I'll create a google doc and we can cooperatively answer/ edit.
> One question, do these have to be very long answers? What are the
> requirements for citing new and old bylaws.
>
> Anna
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 13:26 farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone
>>
>> We need to respond to this by 15 May. We shall not forget, so can someone
>> volunteer to take charge (to remind us and get us together to provide
>> answers)
>>
>> Best
>> Farzaneh
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Tapani Tarvainen" <ncsg at tapani.tarvainen.info>
>> Date: 8 Mar 2017 08:20
>> Subject: Constituency Review questionnaire
>> To: "Farzaneh Badii" <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>, "Klaus Stoll" <
>> kdrstoll at gmail.com>
>> Cc: "NCSG EC" <ncsg-ec at lists.ncsg.is>
>>
>> Dear Constituency Chairs,
>>
>> NCSG Executive Committee is conducting Constituency Review, as required
>> by NCSG Charter 2.3.3, to determine if any recommendation should be made
>> to the Board regarding a change in status of any Constituency.
>>
>> To that end we ask you to answer to the questions below.
>>
>> 1a) What is the purpose of your constituency, as defined
>>     in your bylaws?
>>     (Preferably both link to your bylaws in the web as
>>     well as copy of the relevant text.)
>>
>> 1b) Are all your members also members of NCSG (yes/no)?
>>     (This is just formal confirmation that you fulfill
>>     the requirement in NCSG Charter.)
>>
>> 1c) What is the the common interest or background of
>>     your membership and the focus of your group?
>>
>> 2) Do you have a publicly dynamic, publicly (world-readably) archived
>>    mailing lists and where their archives can be found (URL)?
>>    Please provide a brief description of the list(s), in particular
>>    if they are used for actual decision-making or only discussion.
>>
>>    If you have other, non-public fora that are used for
>>    decision-making or significant discussions within your
>>    constituency, please describe them as well.
>>
>> 3) Do you participate actively in relevant NCSG and GNSO
>>    PDP Working Groups or Work Teams?
>>
>>    Please provide as complete as possible list of such groups or teams
>>    and names of your people who've participated in them over the
>>    years 2015 and 2016, noting also any who've been Chairs or Co-Chairs.
>>
>> 4) Have you participated actively in submitting comments and
>>    other policy statements to the NCSG and GNSO?
>>
>>    Please provide as complete list as possible of such comments
>>    and statements you've made during 2015-2016, with links to
>>    where they've been published.
>>
>>    Please also describe the process your constituency uses
>>    to make and agree on public comments:
>>    How is it done?
>>    If any non-members participate, how is that handled?
>>
>> 5) Do you have a list of your current membership publicly
>>    visible in the web? If so, where (URL)?
>>
>>    Do you have at least 10 participants who've signed up to
>>    an updated SOI?
>>
>>    If your public member list does not have links to SOIs,
>>    please provide a list (links to SOIs) of at least 10
>>    of your members.
>>
>> For all questions: If you have plans or projects in progress
>> that may affect your situation in the future, including but
>> not limited to changes in your bylaws, please describe them.
>>
>> Please reply to me by 15 May, 2017, even if you can't come up with
>> complete answers to all questions by that time. We will to ask for
>> more details and clarifications as needed and engage you in discussion
>> about possible problems, and welcome any questions or concerns you may
>> have about this before answering.
>>
>> The intent is to complete the review by ICANN59 meeting in Johannesburg,
>> but we may take longer if needed.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Tapani Tarvainen
>> NCSG Chair
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCUC-EC mailing list
>> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20170331/257a4905/attachment.html>