[NCUC-EC] Applications for travel support

Thu Jan 12 17:40:11 CET 2017

I endorse the anti harrasment public comment

Le jeudi 12 janvier 2017, hfaiedh ines <hfaiedh.ines2 at gmail.com> a écrit :

> Dear all
> I apologize for the delay i was travelling with very little access to the
> net.
>
> I totally endorse Tatiana s opinion and choice of candidates for the same
> reason.
> I will be a coach at icann 58 but definetely ready to take one more
> mentee.
>
> Le jeudi 12 janvier 2017, Tatiana Tropina <tatiana.tropina at gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','tatiana.tropina at gmail.com');>> a écrit :
>
>> Hi Farz and all,
>> As someone who already endorsed: I do not have any objection to include
>> Milton's correction. All I want it to get this comment submitted, as we are
>> short of time. I didn't see any objection since yesterday, so I suggest if
>> Renata clarifies her endorsement and you as a chair endorse it to consider
>> that we have a majority: Renata (? only if she meant that we can send it),
>> Dave, you, me. With Anna abstaining and Ines not submitting her vote yet
>> and that you can include Milton's comment and submit the document as NCUC
>> chair.
>> So if things are like that I think we can proceed at the end of the day
>> with submission.
>> If Renata didn't endorse, then we have to decide whether we actually have
>> a consensus/majority.
>> Cheers
>> Tanya
>>
>> On 12 January 2017 at 13:58, farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thank you Renata. I am not clear whether you are abstaining in the end
>>> or endorsing. would be grateful if you could clarify.
>>>
>>> On another note, the public comment is not perfect. The process had some
>>> issues. At NCUC level Corrine and I worked on rfrom the beginning of
>>> January to fix the procedural issues and at NCUC level those who expressed
>>>  concerns to me were ok with the document in the end.
>>>
>>> This is a collective work by NCUC members (and NCSG but we should not
>>> mix the two up, which was frequently done during this process).Even if few
>>> worked on it, it was transparently on the mailing list for a while for
>>> people to work on. I personally do not agree with some of it. But here we
>>> are trying to send the collective work. If we don't manage to send it
>>> because  the process that we can fix in the future had issues, then I think
>>> we will be at loss.
>>>
>>> We can endorse this, show that we want an anti-harrassment policy and we
>>> have an opinion on how it should be done. And work on a process that is
>>> less ad hoc.
>>>
>>> As to Milton's comment, you need to decide what to do with it. We have
>>> not received an objection on the mailing list, it can be added to the
>>> comment. But that is up to EC to decide. Please decide quickly, the
>>> deadline is today.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Best
>>>
>>> Farzaneh
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Farzaneh
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 4:26 AM, Renata Aquino Ribeiro <
>>> raquino at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Tatiana
>>>>
>>>> Thanks! These LAC inclusion actions are indeed wanted by the
>>>> community. But they are very few and discretionary from a few staff in
>>>> ICANN who champions them. They mostly surrounded LACRALO but it is
>>>> nice to have an NCUC member benefitted.
>>>>
>>>> It would be better, however, not to have 1 or 2 ICANN community member
>>>> benefitted here and there but building a truly inclusive diversity
>>>> policy which relates directly to accountability. But I'm new on that
>>>> part of ICANN that you know so well and I can only hope.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> Renata
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 3:18 AM, Tatiana Tropina
>>>> <tatiana.tropina at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > Hi all,
>>>> >
>>>> > Oh great news about Louise! Awesome! Very good for LAC, Renata!
>>>> > Congratulations!
>>>> >
>>>> > Then it's a very easy decision: with having Louise on board already, I
>>>> > support giving funding to Aarti, Grace and Ming and hope Farz can take
>>>> > decision that would allow them all to attend. I think 1900-1300-800
>>>> USD
>>>> > looks like a fair distribution in accordance with their requests?
>>>> >
>>>> > Cheers
>>>> > Tanya
>>>> >
>>>> > On 12 Jan 2017 08:56, "Renata Aquino Ribeiro" <raquino at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Hi
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Louise is being integrated in other program for newcomers in ICANN.
>>>> >> Therefore, this program may result in her participation in meetings
>>>> so
>>>> >> there may be the possibility of her coming already to Copenhagen
>>>> >> through this program. It was a LAC inclusion effort, since ICANN has
>>>> >> had less engagement from LAC since the move out of meeting schedule
>>>> in
>>>> >> 2016 and 2017.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> So my vote goes for Aarti, Ming and Grace for the same reasons
>>>> >> proposed here by other NCUC members. I believe even if partial
>>>> funding
>>>> >> to Ming and Grace, they'll still be able to attend. I understand the
>>>> >> funding, even if partial, will be given in the amount decided by
>>>> >> chair.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Thanks Anna, David and Tatiana for bringing more relevant points to
>>>> >> this discussion and also openness to mentoring. We'll also have NCUC
>>>> >> members as fellows and it would be great to also reach them out for
>>>> >> mentoring conversations.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Best, Renata
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 9:22 PM, Anna Loup <loupac5556 at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >> > I think having EC as mentors would be a great idea! I am open to
>>>> being a
>>>> >> > mentor as well. I can provide a nuanced understanding of what goes
>>>> on
>>>> >> > behind
>>>> >> > the scenes at ICANN.
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > Anna
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 10:03 AM, David Cake <dave at davecake.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> I think Aarti is a good choice and generally good to have at
>>>> meetings.
>>>> >> >> I
>>>> >> >> don’t think she is a strong mentor, but perhaps we can compensate
>>>> for
>>>> >> >> that
>>>> >> >> with some coordination between mentors - Aarti’s perspective as a
>>>> >> >> recent
>>>> >> >> newcomer can complement more experienced mentors.
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> Ming, Louise and Grace all look good to me. I agree with the point
>>>> >> >> about
>>>> >> >> relatively few SE Asian participants, its a historically weak
>>>> area for
>>>> >> >> both
>>>> >> >> ICANN in general and NCUC.
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> I note and agree with Renata’s points about Wisdom - he is a
>>>> government
>>>> >> >> participant in the MAG, not sure how he will be participating in
>>>> ICANN.
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> David
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> On 10 Jan. 2017, at 5:32 am, Tatiana Tropina
>>>> >> >> <tatiana.tropina at gmail.com>
>>>> >> >> wrote:
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> Hi all,
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> I went through the applications. There are three submissions from
>>>> >> >> newcomers that looked good to me:  Louise, Grace and Ming.
>>>> >> >> Then... It dawned on me that we have a very unique situation,
>>>> when due
>>>> >> >> to
>>>> >> >> the fact that two of those three newcomers would be in Valencia,
>>>> we can
>>>> >> >> bring three people from regions: Latin America, Africa and
>>>> Asia-Pacific
>>>> >> >> -
>>>> >> >> normally we would never afford bring three peopel from those
>>>> regions at
>>>> >> >> the
>>>> >> >> same time due to the budget restrictions. Louise asked for 2000,
>>>> Grage
>>>> >> >> for
>>>> >> >> 1343 and Ming for 200 USD for ticket + accommodation.
>>>> >> >> I was thinking if we give 1800-1900 to Louis (as she travels from
>>>> >> >> Brazil),
>>>> >> >> 1300 to Grace and 800 to Ming we will bring three people from the
>>>> >> >> regions
>>>> >> >> whom we can mentor with the focal points - and all this within
>>>> 4000
>>>> >> >> budget.
>>>> >> >> Of course, they will have to engage before ICANN and demonstrate
>>>> their
>>>> >> >> willingness to contribute, as Farzy stated in her call (otherwise
>>>> we
>>>> >> >> reserve
>>>> >> >> the right to revoke the fellowship), but I find the possibility
>>>> to give
>>>> >> >> the
>>>> >> >> funding to people from three regions and see their engagement
>>>> prior to
>>>> >> >> ICANN
>>>> >> >> meeting a great opportunity for us.
>>>> >> >> What do you think?
>>>> >> >> I am ready to consider other options, but this is my initial
>>>> >> >> assessment.
>>>> >> >> Cheers
>>>> >> >> Tanya
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> On 9 January 2017 at 19:33, farzaneh badii <
>>>> farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
>>>> >> >> wrote:
>>>> >> >>>
>>>> >> >>> All
>>>> >> >>>
>>>> >> >>> Please find attached the application for travel support from NCUC
>>>> >> >>> members.
>>>> >> >>>
>>>> >> >>> I announced that we will decide by 15 Jan but I think we should
>>>> be
>>>> >> >>> quicker and decide within 3 days so that the selected members can
>>>> >> >>> start
>>>> >> >>> getting engaged sooner.
>>>> >> >>>
>>>> >> >>> We have received mentor applications from Aarti and Hago.
>>>> Others  will
>>>> >> >>> be
>>>> >> >>> mentees. We do not have to select a mentor, they can all be
>>>> mentees
>>>> >> >>> and then
>>>> >> >>> we will put them in touch with our focal points on policy to
>>>> mentor
>>>> >> >>> them or
>>>> >> >>> EC members can do so.
>>>> >> >>>
>>>> >> >>> There are no limit as to the number of travellers. There is a
>>>> limit to
>>>> >> >>> the budget, it should not go over 4000 USD.
>>>> >> >>>
>>>> >> >>>
>>>> >> >>> Thanks
>>>> >> >>>
>>>> >> >>>
>>>> >> >>> Farzaneh
>>>> >> >>>
>>>> >> >>> _______________________________________________
>>>> >> >>> NCUC-EC mailing list
>>>> >> >>> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>>>> >> >>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>>>> >> >>>
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>>>> >> >> NCUC-EC mailing list
>>>> >> >> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>>>> >> >> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>>>> >> >> NCUC-EC mailing list
>>>> >> >> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>>>> >> >> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > _______________________________________________
>>>> >> > NCUC-EC mailing list
>>>> >> > NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>>>> >> > http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>>> >> NCUC-EC mailing list
>>>> >> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>>>> >> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> NCUC-EC mailing list
>>>> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>>>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20170112/6af90976/attachment.html>