[NCUC-EC] NCUC Operating Procedures

[Michael Karanicolas]

Hi all,

I agree with "guidelines" rather than requirements.

I just tried to edit the transparency sections, but the doc told me my
access had changed halfway through. A couple of small suggested changes, as
follows:

C.  Review and selection of candidates:
1. NCUC EC will review all the candidates’ statements
2. NCUC EC will evaluate each application based on qualifications
3. Each NCUC EC member will provide justification as to why one candidate
is more qualified than other applicants. Candidates who are not selected
for the position shall be sent an email by the NCUC Chair informing them of
the EC’s decision. *Upon request of the candidate, or where otherwise
appropriate, the Chair shall communicate to the applicant how they can
increase their chances of appointment in future rounds.*
4. If the NCUC EC does not agree on a candidate a meeting shall be arranged
to discuss and deliberate the candidates applications
5. The deliberations about the candidates should be held confidentially but
the record should be kept by Chair
6. The meeting will be held privately but the notes, recording and the
transcript should be kept in case the EC decision is challenged * Upon
request of the candidate(s), a more detailed account of the assessment of
their candidacy will be provided. *

Best,

Michael

On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 6:06 PM, Renata Aquino Ribeiro <raquino at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi
>
> I'm in agreement with the changes
>
> I think the appointees section should be guidelines, I don't think much
> should be added there and a note that some requisites are desirable not
> obligatory
>
> Em 22 de ago de 2017 11:02 PM, "farzaneh badii" <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
> escreveu:
>
>> Reminding you of the timeline for the operating procedure. We are now at
>> the stage of resolving the comments. We have until 28th August, then
>> members need to look at it again and comment.
>>
>> Important things to do:
>>
>> I tried to sort out the transparency issue for selections and
>> appointments, please have a look.
>>
>> We need to be more precise about the requirements of appointees section
>> (II).
>>
>> We should probably not be too restrictive. So I suggest instead of
>> calling it "requirements" lets say guidelines for appointments.
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uolqcYivX_KVOgPdjl3wB_aB
>> kHyLcFkvzNsNU47BRQY/edit#
>>
>> Farzaneh
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Renata Aquino Ribeiro <raquino at gmail.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Thanks for the updates regarding this work.
>>> I'm in agreement w/ timeline and sending document for familiarization
>>> and comments by members
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NCUC-EC mailing list
>>> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> NCUC-EC mailing list
> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20170827/caf69c45/attachment.html>