[NCUC-EC] NCUC meetings during the policy forum

[Tatiana Tropina]

I am not attending, but I would support the option 1.
Cheers
Tanya

On 21 April 2017 at 14:59, hfaiedh ines <hfaiedh.ines2 at gmail.com> wrote:

> I would lean towards the first option. I personally will be attending as a
> Fellow this time but hope to contribute to policy discussions as well.
>
> On Apr 21, 2017 05:51, "David Cake" <dave at davecake.net> wrote:
>
>> I think both approaches are useful.
>> Approach 1 is very helpful both for those who are relatively new to
>> understand what is happening, and as a coordination opportunity for those
>> are already involved. I think mostly this is part of on-boarding and
>> mentorship, though - the more involved members helping others up to speed.
>> I am happy to brief members on the RDS cross-immunity session, I suspect
>> Stephanie will be happy to as well.
>>
>> Approach 2 is more an opportunity for direct policy work. I think the GAC
>> suggestion is a good one. The tricky part is organising a useful sub-group
>> of the GAC - they are in session themselves most of the time, and it can be
>> quite hard to get a group that can have a useful discussion on an issue. We
>> would probably have to rely on the GNSO-GAC liaison helping, and I don’t
>> know how useful Carlos will be. I am happy to talk to Carlos and try and
>> set up some discussions, but no guarantees if he does not deliver.
>> The ccNSO I think there is already the GNSO/CCNSO council meeting, if
>> there are specific issues to discuss perhaps.
>> The leaders of PDP working groups that do NOT have public sessions
>> perhaps? I know that we already have hours of RDS meetings, all of which
>> generally have NCUC people such as me and Stephanie already heavily
>> involved, and I don’t think there would be much value in separate meetings
>> just with NCUC (though a quick strategy meeting just for NCUC/NCSG people
>> might be useful). I think its similar for the other two big WGs. .
>>
>> David
>>
>>
>> On 20 Apr 2017, at 12:09 pm, farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> All,
>>
>> If we want to have  NCUC meeting(s) during the policy forum, then we need
>> to ask before 26 April for meeting slots
>>
>> I suggest a couple of approaches, please comment
>>
>> *1.* Not to have any stand alone NCUC meeting, but have morning policy
>> briefings and afternoon briefings of what policy discussions are going on
>> and why we should attend them. We can also help GNSO with arranging the 8
>> to 8.30 outreach they have OR we could have our own briefings for our
>> members and newcomers. Such briefings, however, need a lot of policy
>> insights so EC members attending the meeting should be well versed on
>> various topics beforehand. You can do this by consulting with Rafik, Matt
>> and Ayden.
>>
>> Approx 8 cross-community sessions were proposed. That's quite a lot.
>> Please identify the important ones and brief our members with a brief
>> background on what the topics are.
>>
>>
>> *2. *NCUC could meet with some other stakeholders and advisory
>> committee. For example, NCUC could meet with some GAC members to discuss
>> two things: Underserved regions and two letter top level domain that match
>> country codes. But someone from EC has to learn about these issues and run
>> the meeting. So, are there any volunteers? We can also meet with ccNSO
>> members and just introduce ourselves and tell them what we do at GNSO and
>> what issues we work on. Or, meet with the leaders of PDP working groups (
>> they might never have the time) to update us on their work).
>>
>> 3. Have a combination of both 1 and 2. Which is heavy work and you need
>> to actively organize it.
>>
>>
>> Attached is the GNSO agenda, and as you can see it's quite full.
>>
>> My advice: from the previous policy forum I figured that we need a
>> strategy and we need to be prepared before the meeting, so I more lean
>> towards option one. Lets focus on brief policy outreaches in the mornings,
>> set strategy before you go to the GNSO policy meetings or any other meeting
>> we identify as necessary. The strategy to include: what we are going to
>> attend, what issues we are going to address, how and who to report back to
>> NCUC), and hold short brainstorming sessions during the the week of the
>> meeting.
>>
>> We also need an NCUC report at the end of the meeting. I would like to
>> ask Bruna to be the penholder for this, but you need to help her with
>> writing and contributing to the report.
>>
>>
>> We need to decide soon, so let me know.
>>
>>
>> Farzaneh
>> <ICANN59 Draft GNSO Schedule - ICANN59 Draft GNSO Schedule .pdf>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCUC-EC mailing list
>> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCUC-EC mailing list
>> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> NCUC-EC mailing list
> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20170421/0e878c61/attachment.html>