[NCUC-EC] NCUC meetings during the policy forum

[hfaiedh ines]

I would lean towards the first option. I personally will be attending as a
Fellow this time but hope to contribute to policy discussions as well.

On Apr 21, 2017 05:51, "David Cake" <dave at davecake.net> wrote:

> I think both approaches are useful.
> Approach 1 is very helpful both for those who are relatively new to
> understand what is happening, and as a coordination opportunity for those
> are already involved. I think mostly this is part of on-boarding and
> mentorship, though - the more involved members helping others up to speed.
> I am happy to brief members on the RDS cross-immunity session, I suspect
> Stephanie will be happy to as well.
>
> Approach 2 is more an opportunity for direct policy work. I think the GAC
> suggestion is a good one. The tricky part is organising a useful sub-group
> of the GAC - they are in session themselves most of the time, and it can be
> quite hard to get a group that can have a useful discussion on an issue. We
> would probably have to rely on the GNSO-GAC liaison helping, and I don’t
> know how useful Carlos will be. I am happy to talk to Carlos and try and
> set up some discussions, but no guarantees if he does not deliver.
> The ccNSO I think there is already the GNSO/CCNSO council meeting, if
> there are specific issues to discuss perhaps.
> The leaders of PDP working groups that do NOT have public sessions
> perhaps? I know that we already have hours of RDS meetings, all of which
> generally have NCUC people such as me and Stephanie already heavily
> involved, and I don’t think there would be much value in separate meetings
> just with NCUC (though a quick strategy meeting just for NCUC/NCSG people
> might be useful). I think its similar for the other two big WGs. .
>
> David
>
>
> On 20 Apr 2017, at 12:09 pm, farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> All,
>
> If we want to have  NCUC meeting(s) during the policy forum, then we need
> to ask before 26 April for meeting slots
>
> I suggest a couple of approaches, please comment
>
> *1.* Not to have any stand alone NCUC meeting, but have morning policy
> briefings and afternoon briefings of what policy discussions are going on
> and why we should attend them. We can also help GNSO with arranging the 8
> to 8.30 outreach they have OR we could have our own briefings for our
> members and newcomers. Such briefings, however, need a lot of policy
> insights so EC members attending the meeting should be well versed on
> various topics beforehand. You can do this by consulting with Rafik, Matt
> and Ayden.
>
> Approx 8 cross-community sessions were proposed. That's quite a lot.
> Please identify the important ones and brief our members with a brief
> background on what the topics are.
>
>
> *2. *NCUC could meet with some other stakeholders and advisory committee.
> For example, NCUC could meet with some GAC members to discuss two things:
> Underserved regions and two letter top level domain that match country
> codes. But someone from EC has to learn about these issues and run the
> meeting. So, are there any volunteers? We can also meet with ccNSO members
> and just introduce ourselves and tell them what we do at GNSO and what
> issues we work on. Or, meet with the leaders of PDP working groups ( they
> might never have the time) to update us on their work).
>
> 3. Have a combination of both 1 and 2. Which is heavy work and you need to
> actively organize it.
>
>
> Attached is the GNSO agenda, and as you can see it's quite full.
>
> My advice: from the previous policy forum I figured that we need a
> strategy and we need to be prepared before the meeting, so I more lean
> towards option one. Lets focus on brief policy outreaches in the mornings,
> set strategy before you go to the GNSO policy meetings or any other meeting
> we identify as necessary. The strategy to include: what we are going to
> attend, what issues we are going to address, how and who to report back to
> NCUC), and hold short brainstorming sessions during the the week of the
> meeting.
>
> We also need an NCUC report at the end of the meeting. I would like to ask
> Bruna to be the penholder for this, but you need to help her with writing
> and contributing to the report.
>
>
> We need to decide soon, so let me know.
>
>
> Farzaneh
> <ICANN59 Draft GNSO Schedule - ICANN59 Draft GNSO Schedule .pdf>
> _______________________________________________
> NCUC-EC mailing list
> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCUC-EC mailing list
> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20170421/40edbdc4/attachment.html>