[NCUC-EC] Review NCUC Travel Support Applications

[Grace Githaiga]

Dear All
Many apologies. I completely forgot that I had promised on Friday to respond. I know Bonface has been doing alot of outreach for ICANN, not necessarily for NCUC. Benjamin has been supported before but I did not see an indication of the outreach he has done so far, and instead there is a 'plan'. So my main support would go to Michael, then to Bonface if members agree that what he has been doing can be supported.

Rgds
Grace

From: farzaneh.badii at gmail.com
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 16:34:45 +0200
To: milton at gatech.edu
Subject: Re: [NCUC-EC] Review NCUC Travel Support Applications
CC: ncuc-ec at lists.ncuc.org

Thanks Milton. Joao, Grace, let us know ASAP, we need to approve travel support. Getting visa is not easy. 
On 6 September 2016 at 16:30, Mueller, Milton L <milton at gatech.edu> wrote:








Yes
 



From: farzaneh badii [mailto:farzaneh.badii at gmail.com]


Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2016 2:13 AM

To: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>

Cc: Joao Carlos Caribe <caribe at entropia.blog.br>; Exec. Comm <ncuc-ec at lists.ncuc.org>; Mueller, Milton L <milton at gatech.edu>

Subject: Re: [NCUC-EC] Review NCUC Travel Support Applications



 
Does everyone agree that we only support Michael for this round and tell the other applicants to become active and apply next time?


 

On 6 Sep 2016 1:56 a.m., "Rafik Dammak" <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:


 

Hi,


 


I see a Michael as strong case because his involvement in workstream and clear interest on that (e.g. DIDP), also being the representative of an organisational member like Center for Law and Democracy which would make sense to engage more.


 


Best,


 


Rafik


 

2016-09-06 7:12 GMT+09:00 farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>:

Hi Milton 

We have to be quick on this because of visas etc.  Who do you suggest we take on?


Best

Farzaneh 


 



On 6 Sep 2016 12:02 a.m., "Mueller, Milton L" <milton at gatech.edu> wrote:







I think we are spending money just for the sake of spending money.

$4000 is a limit, not a requirement. If we do not think we are getting something valuable from spending
 it, then let’s not spend it. 
 
I am not convinced that we need to support all three of these people
 
 



From: NCUC-EC [mailto:ncuc-ec-bounces at lists.ncuc.org]
On Behalf Of João Carlos Rebello Caribé

Sent: Monday, September 5, 2016 5:41 PM

To: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>

Cc: ncuc-ec at lists.ncuc.org

Subject: Re: [NCUC-EC] Review NCUC Travel Support Applications


 
Agree, good suggestion.

 


They are requesting:


 


Benjamin - U$ 1500 - 34% of total


Bonface - U$ 1000 - 23% of total


Michael - U$ 1920 - 43% of total


 


Total is U$ 4420


 


I suggest to rate proportional of the U$ 420,00 as is:


 


Benjamin - U$ 1500 - 150 = U$ 1350


Bonface - U$ 1000 - 90 = U$ 910


Michael - U$ 1920 - 180 = U$ 1740


 


Total is U$ 4000


 


[]s


Joao 


 


 


 


 


 


Em 05/09/2016, às 08:41, Rafik Dammak escreveu:

 


Hi everyone,


 


maybe as workable suggestion, we can review if we can provide partial funding to Michael, Benjamin and Bonface.
 we can discuss how much we allocate.



 





--

João Carlos R. Caribé

Transdisciplinary Consultant - Wazushi

NETmundial Initiative Counselor

ICANN NCUC Executive Committee member



http://about.me/caribe



Skype joaocaribe

+55(021) 9 8761 1967





 




 


_______________________________________________

NCUC-EC mailing list

NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org

http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec





 











-- 
Farzaneh 


_______________________________________________
NCUC-EC mailing list
NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20160906/8ddb9487/attachment.html>