[NCUC-EC] Review NCUC Travel Support Applications

Tue Sep 6 16:56:41 CEST 2016

Joao,

I am really in favor of capacity building , I know where you are coming
from, and we should plan that but then again the travel policy does not
make Bonface or Benjamin or Hago eligible. Look below, is there a working
group they are involved with? are they commenting on public comments we
post to the list?

   1. Are actively and verifiably engaged in NCUC’s work, for example
   constituency governance, NCUC/NCSG policy discussions, or GNSO or
   cross-community working groups;
   2. Need to be at a given meeting because the above mentioned work will
   be advanced there;

We could ask them to become active and we seriously consider their next
application. I offer to give them guidance to make it easier for them to
become active.

Best

On 6 September 2016 at 16:49, João Carlos Rebello Caribé <
caribe at entropia.blog.br> wrote:

> Farzy,
>
> Define active?
>
> It's a subjective value, active means participate on the discussions, on
> the meetings, projects and tasks, also someone would be active out in their
> local "bubble", active means be a multiplicator, a personal hub, a decision
> maker, a opinion maker. It's not easy to fair evaluate this.
>
> However we can think about what the supporter can add to NCUC community,
> the right question is: Why you deserve to be supported by NCUC to travel to
> meeting, which return you will bring ?
>
> I'm in a delicate position since Bonface and Benjamin are two members I
> brought to Fellow and to NCUC, as Renata too, so I observing Benjamin away
> from IG issues, in other hand Bonface is very active, even his limited
> budget.
>
> My final suggestion is to support Michael and Bonface, I'm sure he will
> bring return to NCUC.
>
> []s
> Joao Carlos Caribé
>
> Em 06/09/2016, às 11:34, farzaneh badii escreveu:
>
> Thanks Milton. Joao, Grace, let us know ASAP, we need to approve travel
> support. Getting visa is not easy.
>
> On 6 September 2016 at 16:30, Mueller, Milton L <milton at gatech.edu> wrote:
>
>> Yes
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* farzaneh badii [mailto:farzaneh.badii at gmail.com]
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 6, 2016 2:13 AM
>> *To:* Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>> *Cc:* Joao Carlos Caribe <caribe at entropia.blog.br>; Exec. Comm <
>> ncuc-ec at lists.ncuc.org>; Mueller, Milton L <milton at gatech.edu>
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: [NCUC-EC] Review NCUC Travel Support Applications
>>
>>
>>
>> Does everyone agree that we only support Michael for this round and tell
>> the other applicants to become active and apply next time?
>>
>>
>>
>> On 6 Sep 2016 1:56 a.m., "Rafik Dammak" <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> I see a Michael as strong case because his involvement in workstream and
>> clear interest on that (e.g. DIDP), also being the representative of an
>> organisational member like Center for Law and Democracy which would make
>> sense to engage more.
>>
>>
>>
>> Best,
>>
>>
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>>
>>
>> 2016-09-06 7:12 GMT+09:00 farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>:
>>
>> Hi Milton
>>
>> We have to be quick on this because of visas etc.  Who do you suggest we
>> take on?
>>
>> Best
>>
>> Farzaneh
>>
>>
>>
>> On 6 Sep 2016 12:02 a.m., "Mueller, Milton L" <milton at gatech.edu> wrote:
>>
>> I think we are spending money just for the sake of spending money.
>>
>> $4000 is a limit, not a requirement. If we do not think we are getting
>> something valuable from spending it, then let’s not spend it.
>>
>>
>>
>> I am not convinced that we need to support all three of these people
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* NCUC-EC [mailto:ncuc-ec-bounces at lists.ncuc.org] *On Behalf Of *João
>> Carlos Rebello Caribé
>> *Sent:* Monday, September 5, 2016 5:41 PM
>> *To:* Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
>> *Cc:* ncuc-ec at lists.ncuc.org
>> *Subject:* Re: [NCUC-EC] Review NCUC Travel Support Applications
>>
>>
>>
>> Agree, good suggestion.
>>
>>
>>
>> They are requesting:
>>
>>
>>
>> Benjamin - U$ 1500 - 34% of total
>>
>> Bonface - U$ 1000 - 23% of total
>>
>> Michael - U$ 1920 - 43% of total
>>
>>
>>
>> Total is U$ 4420
>>
>>
>>
>> I suggest to rate proportional of the U$ 420,00 as is:
>>
>>
>>
>> Benjamin - U$ 1500 - 150 = U$ 1350
>>
>> Bonface - U$ 1000 - 90 = U$ 910
>>
>> Michael - U$ 1920 - 180 = U$ 1740
>>
>>
>>
>> Total is U$ 4000
>>
>>
>>
>> []s
>>
>> Joao
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Em 05/09/2016, às 08:41, Rafik Dammak escreveu:
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>>
>>
>> maybe as workable suggestion, we can review if we can provide partial
>> funding to Michael, Benjamin and Bonface. we can discuss how much we
>> allocate.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> João Carlos R. Caribé
>> Transdisciplinary Consultant - Wazushi
>> NETmundial Initiative Counselor
>> ICANN NCUC Executive Committee member
>>
>> http://about.me/caribe
>>
>> Skype joaocaribe
>> +55(021) 9 8761 1967
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCUC-EC mailing list
>> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Farzaneh
>
>
> --
> João Carlos R. Caribé
> Transdisciplinary Consultant - Wazushi
> NETmundial Initiative Counselor
> ICANN NCUC Executive Committee member
>
> http://about.me/caribe
>
> Skype joaocaribe
> +55(021) 9 8761 1967
>
>

-- 
Farzaneh
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20160906/f04094ae/attachment.html>