[NCUC-EC] Fwd: [council] FW: CCWG-Acct SO/AC Questions

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi Farzaneh,

Thanks,
lets prepare a NCUC response then. we have different mechanisms and the
bylaws consultation was a good opportunity to go through that.

Best,

Rafik

2016-11-21 21:48 GMT+09:00 farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>:

> Hi
>
> We should be ready. Steve on the call last week said that gnso will likely
> be asking the stakeholder groups and constituencies to provide answers.
> Lets just have the answers in case they ask us too.
>
> On 21 Nov 2016 1:46 p.m., "Rafik Dammak" <rafik.dammak at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> that was sent to GNSO council in relation to CCWG SO/AC accountability
>> subgroup. Farzaneh is one of the co-rapporteur.
>> it is unclear if the GNSO will work on unified comment and/or each GNSO
>> SG/C should make its own input too. for the latter, we would have to
>> coordinate with NCSG.
>> I would like your feedback and I assume we should prepare a draft before
>> sharing that with NCUC members.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Rafik
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: James M. Bladel <jbladel at godaddy.com>
>> Date: 2016-11-18 13:54 GMT+09:00
>> Subject: [council] FW: CCWG-Acct SO/AC Questions
>> To: GNSO Council List <council at gnso.icann.org>
>>
>>
>> Council Colleagues –
>>
>>
>>
>> Please see below for a request from the CCWG-WS2 Co-Chairs, seeking
>> feedback on how each SO/AC (and component organizations) maintain internal
>> accountability.  I apologize for the delay in submitting this to the list.
>>
>>
>>
>> If there are no objections, I will work with Heather, Donna and Staff to
>> draft a response.  But please feel free to share this request with your
>> SG/C leadership, and relay their feedback as well.
>>
>>
>>
>> Note that the CCWG co-chairs are looking for a response in early
>> December, so thanks for giving this your attention.
>>
>> Thank You,
>>
>> J.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *Karen Mulberry <karen.mulberry at icann.org>
>> *Date: *Friday, November 4, 2016 at 4:22
>>
>> *Subject: *CCWG-Acct SO/AC Questions
>>
>>
>>
>> Sent on behalf of the CCWG-Accountability WS2 Co-Chair’s
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear SO/AC Chairs,
>>
>>
>>
>> As you are aware, the newly-adopted ICANN bylaws tasked our Cross
>> Community Working Group to investigate several issues as part of our Work
>> Stream 2 effort.  SO/AC Accountability is one of these items. As part of
>> this effort, we have set up a subgroup, responsible for reviewing how each
>> SO and AC is accountable to its designated community, and potentially to
>> global Internet stakeholders as well.  The background and progress for this
>> group are described here[docs.google.com].
>>
>>
>>
>> As part of this effort, the group intends to start by an assessment of
>> the current situation. That’s why we are turning to you to point us to
>> resources and documents used to maintain accountability to your respective
>> designated community, taking into account the particular or specific
>> working modalities of each SO/AC (and any subgroups).
>>
>>
>>
>> We would appreciate if you could provide responses to the attached
>> questions within the next 30 days, so that work on this important item of
>> WS2 can proceed in due course. Responses can be provided to
>> acct-staff at icann.org. Along with the rapporteurs of the SO/AC
>> accountability subgroup, Cheryl Langdon-Orr, Farzaneh Badii and Steve Del
>> Bianco, we thank you in advance and remain available for any clarification
>> that you may need.
>>
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Leon, Thomas & Mathieu
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20161122/03cdeed2/attachment.html>