[NCUC-EC] Fwd: [council] FW: CCWG-Acct SO/AC Questions

[Rafik Dammak]

Hi,

that was sent to GNSO council in relation to CCWG SO/AC accountability
subgroup. Farzaneh is one of the co-rapporteur.
it is unclear if the GNSO will work on unified comment and/or each GNSO
SG/C should make its own input too. for the latter, we would have to
coordinate with NCSG.
I would like your feedback and I assume we should prepare a draft before
sharing that with NCUC members.

Best,

Rafik

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: James M. Bladel <jbladel at godaddy.com>
Date: 2016-11-18 13:54 GMT+09:00
Subject: [council] FW: CCWG-Acct SO/AC Questions
To: GNSO Council List <council at gnso.icann.org>


Council Colleagues –



Please see below for a request from the CCWG-WS2 Co-Chairs, seeking
feedback on how each SO/AC (and component organizations) maintain internal
accountability.  I apologize for the delay in submitting this to the list.



If there are no objections, I will work with Heather, Donna and Staff to
draft a response.  But please feel free to share this request with your
SG/C leadership, and relay their feedback as well.



Note that the CCWG co-chairs are looking for a response in early December,
so thanks for giving this your attention.

Thank You,

J.



*From: *Karen Mulberry <karen.mulberry at icann.org>
*Date: *Friday, November 4, 2016 at 4:22

*Subject: *CCWG-Acct SO/AC Questions



Sent on behalf of the CCWG-Accountability WS2 Co-Chair’s



Dear SO/AC Chairs,



As you are aware, the newly-adopted ICANN bylaws tasked our Cross Community
Working Group to investigate several issues as part of our Work Stream 2
effort.  SO/AC Accountability is one of these items. As part of this
effort, we have set up a subgroup, responsible for reviewing how each SO
and AC is accountable to its designated community, and potentially to
global Internet stakeholders as well.  The background and progress for this
group are described here[docs.google.com].



As part of this effort, the group intends to start by an assessment of the
current situation. That’s why we are turning to you to point us to
resources and documents used to maintain accountability to your respective
designated community, taking into account the particular or specific
working modalities of each SO/AC (and any subgroups).



We would appreciate if you could provide responses to the attached
questions within the next 30 days, so that work on this important item of
WS2 can proceed in due course. Responses can be provided to
acct-staff at icann.org. Along with the rapporteurs of the SO/AC
accountability subgroup, Cheryl Langdon-Orr, Farzaneh Badii and Steve Del
Bianco, we thank you in advance and remain available for any clarification
that you may need.



Best regards,

Leon, Thomas & Mathieu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20161121/02be2ed5/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: SO AC questions [revised 2-Nov, v2].docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 128761 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20161121/02be2ed5/attachment.docx>