[NCUC-EC] NCUC election ballot

[Mueller, Milton L]

I agree Tapani that we should explain, but I fail to see how following NCUC bylaws is a drastic change or in any way open to challenge. It's all there in black and white numbers in the bylaws. I guess it is the prior elections that should be discussed and challenged, not this one. Furthermore, unlike the NCSG election, this ballot was circulated In advance and subject to approval of the EC. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: NCUC-EC [mailto:ncuc-ec-bounces at lists.ncuc.org] On Behalf Of Tapani
> Tarvainen
> Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 5:55 AM
> To: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
> Cc: ncuc-ec at lists.ncuc.org
> Subject: Re: [NCUC-EC] NCUC election ballot
> 
> On Nov 18 19:47, Rafik Dammak (rafik.dammak at gmail.com) wrote:
> 
> > It is indicated in the ballot and aligned with the current bylaws.
> > Not sure why it would be problem.
> 
> Twice-is-forever precedents have been a problem in elections before...
> 
> > I dont think that is open for ncuc list discussion at this stage.
> 
> At least announce and explain it, rather than just leaving it as small print in
> the ballot. Seriously, this is drastically bigger thing than what caused the
> brouhaha in the NCSG elections in that it could actually have a real effect on
> election outcome.
> 
> --
> Tapani Tarvainen
> _______________________________________________
> NCUC-EC mailing list
> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec