[NCUC-EC] NCUC election ballot

[Tapani Tarvainen]

> On Nov 18 19:47, Rafik Dammak (rafik.dammak at gmail.com) wrote:
> 
> > It is indicated in the ballot and aligned with the current bylaws.
> > Not sure why it would be problem.
> 
> Twice-is-forever precedents have been a problem in elections before...
> 
> > I dont think that is open for ncuc list discussion at this stage.
> 
> At least announce and explain it, rather than just leaving it as small
> print in the ballot. Seriously, this is drastically bigger thing than
> what caused the brouhaha in the NCSG elections in that it could
> actually have a real effect on election outcome.

To clarify, I don't care one way or the other which weights are used,
nor do I have any idea how the change would affect the results, but
I'm sure it would have some impact and some people are likely to
complain if they are surprised by it.

-- 
Tapani Tarvainen