[NCUC-EC] Intersessional travel support applicants

hfaiedh ines hfaiedh.ines2 at gmail.com
Mon Dec 12 03:39:18 CET 2016


Hi all,

It was a hard choice to say the least. All deserve travel support but I
believe for this meeting, Matt Shears would be a great asset for the
discussions.

Best regards


2016-12-10 12:47 GMT-05:00 Anna Loup <aloup at usc.edu>:

> Hello all,
>
> First, I wanted to say that I am glad we are working hard to make , what I
> know will be, a great choice for the extra spot at the intersessional. As a
> summit between the leadership of the NCUC and NCSG, the Intersessional is a
> critical time when we can meet outside of the hectic ICANN meetings. For a
> young EC, this is especially important because the EC has a big year coming
> up and this will be a great time for us to learn how to best work with each
> other and find common ground.
>
> It will also provide us time to create rules for joint sessions (important
> for the NCPH board seat). Finally, this will be a critical time for the EC
> to meet with staff. As someone who got my start through the initial
> iterations of the ICANN student-internship program, I saw the power of the
> intersessional meetings first -hand in giving EC members time to meet with
> staff outside of ICANN meetings. They are a critical part of our work and
> as a young EC it will be a great time for us to build relationships.
>
> Finally, I too think this is a good list of people and am glad we included
> everyone. I want to put my support behind Matt because of his extensive
> role as NCSG PC, his work on CCWG-accountability, and his work in
> Hyderabad (which he didn't mention in his SOI). His work at Hyderabad will
> be very helpful to this new EC as he already is up to date on council
> conversations. This will certainly help the new EC transition smoothly.
>
> Best,
> Anna
>
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Tatiana Tropina <
> tatiana.tropina at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Agree that mathematical average won't work in this case, we gave neither
>> enough time no defined criteria. I will come up with my choice between Matt
>> and James tomorrow.
>> Cheers
>> Tanya
>>
>> On 10 Dec 2016 11:28, "farzaneh badii" <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Renata,
>>>
>>> Since we really don't have much time for this one we need to act
>>> quickly. Since we have not agreed on a broad set of criteria I am not sure
>>> if mathematical average would work. But how about you give it a try and
>>> tell others if they support people you have come up with. But we need to
>>> decide by Monday the latest.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> On 10 December 2016 at 10:01, Renata Aquino Ribeiro <raquino at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> This is very hard.
>>>> Indeed all candidates are good.
>>>> We need to discuss criteria for these things asap.
>>>>
>>>> I was thinking maybe a shorlist (order of priority to go), we compare
>>>> each others short list and do a mathematical average
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Tatiana Tropina
>>>> <tatiana.tropina at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > All candidates are good. But with the focus of the meeting and the
>>>> > involvement in current policy work, for me it's a hard choice between
>>>> > Matthew and James. I wish we had two travel slots. I will take time
>>>> to think
>>>> > till tomorrow.
>>>> > Cheers
>>>> > Tanya
>>>> >
>>>> > On 9 Dec 2016 17:12, "farzaneh badii" <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Dear all,
>>>> >>
>>>> >> we need to decide on who should receive travel support to go to
>>>> Iceland.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> I have attached the name and SOI of those that sent their request.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> I cannot find Wolfgang's statement of interest. Will send to you
>>>> later if
>>>> >> he has sent one before the deadline. But attached is the compiled
>>>> SOIs.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Ayden sent his late. We cannot accept late applications, but I
>>>> wanted to
>>>> >> attach his SOI considering that the deadline was too short.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> We need to decide by Monday the latest.
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Best
>>>> >> --
>>>> >> Farzaneh
>>>> >>
>>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>>> >> NCUC-EC mailing list
>>>> >> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>>>> >> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.ncuc.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_ncuc-2Dec&d=DgMFaQ&c=clK7kQUTWtAVEOVIgvi0NU5BOUHhpN0H8p7CSfnc_gI&r=H-NH_Qrtek1FqfDQOL5aEw&m=E0DySsF-JbzW130dN-uLRVMdSRE6H1HDV0NZPLX_bVw&s=4nwEZkDtMtPCC7E__JumOHUy2bPpD_BxgrJAbzP9R4Q&e=>
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > NCUC-EC mailing list
>>>> > NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>>>> > http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.ncuc.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_ncuc-2Dec&d=DgMFaQ&c=clK7kQUTWtAVEOVIgvi0NU5BOUHhpN0H8p7CSfnc_gI&r=H-NH_Qrtek1FqfDQOL5aEw&m=E0DySsF-JbzW130dN-uLRVMdSRE6H1HDV0NZPLX_bVw&s=4nwEZkDtMtPCC7E__JumOHUy2bPpD_BxgrJAbzP9R4Q&e=>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Farzaneh
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NCUC-EC mailing list
>> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.nc
>> uc.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_ncuc-2Dec&d=DgIGaQ&c=clK7k
>> QUTWtAVEOVIgvi0NU5BOUHhpN0H8p7CSfnc_gI&r=H-NH_Qrtek1FqfDQOL5
>> aEw&m=E0DySsF-JbzW130dN-uLRVMdSRE6H1HDV0NZPLX_bVw&s=4nwEZkDt
>> MtPCC7E__JumOHUy2bPpD_BxgrJAbzP9R4Q&e=
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *Masters in Public Diplomacy '16*
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCUC-EC mailing list
> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20161211/463473b9/attachment.html>


More information about the NCUC-EC mailing list