[NCUC-EC] 答复: Fwd: Conduct at ICANN Meetings

[Peter Green]

Dear Rafik,


As a priority option, could we share the same concept with RrSG that we request do that work by engaging independent experts.


Another option we could consider is that let's see if there are interested members who would like to participate in that.

NCUC could endorse their outcome in the name of Constituency.


Best

Peter


________________________________
发件人: NCUC-EC <ncuc-ec-bounces at lists.ncuc.org> 代表 Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
发送时间: 2016年4月19日 15:21
收件人: farzaneh badii
抄送: ncuc-ec at lists.ncuc.org
主题: Re: [NCUC-EC] Fwd: Conduct at ICANN Meetings

Hi Farzaneh,

thanks, quite relevant comment. it is not clear how formal it would be i.e. several public comments more or less like a PDP or more ad-hoc based effort.

I guess they want to figure out how much the community want to get involved or get the lead, also about including experts (it seems that is set already)

Best,

Rafik

2016-04-19 13:12 GMT+09:00 farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com<mailto:farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>>:
Hi Rafik

for option one, it be subject to public comment? I agree with not over engineering it .

On 19 April 2016 at 05:28, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com<mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com>> wrote:
hi everyone,

with the regard to our statement about anti-harassment, there is ongoing discussion on how the community should work on that, the different options to give input to board. On other hand, GNSO council itself is drafting a letter to send to the interim CEO and making some suggestions about key points to be covered (http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg18468.html and http://mailman.ipjustice.org/pipermail/pc-ncsg/2016-April/003591.html)

reading some reactions, not all part of communities are keen to get involved on working on such process and would prefer to  experts to handle it. On other side, I know that some of our members are eager to work on the issue.

so the question here, it is how NCUC should do for this issue and what is the preferred option.
personally, I don't have a preference and guess some mix of volunteers and experts to draft a policy would work, avoiding over-engineering the process and able to deliver quickly.

Best Regards,

Rafik

---------- Forwarded message ----------



Dear Community Leaders:

I would  like to follow up on our discussion on 12 April regarding the community’s involvement in developing anti-harassment language, policies and procedures appropriate for our global diverse community that attend ICANN’s meetings. ICANN staff had initially recommended that a community-based consultation group could be formed with the aim to gather information about other policies elsewhere, particularly in the Internet and technology conference space, that can inform further Board and community discussions on the topic.

Several participants on the 12 April call noted, however, that in order to develop an appropriate policy and process, expert advice will be key. As such, they felt that confining these discussions to a community group which may lack the requisite expertise might not be the best approach.

The call participants all agreed that this is nevertheless a topic that clearly warrants further discussion. Certainly, the ICANN Board remains eager to work with the community to move forward with clarifying and enhancing our current Expected Standards of Behavior. Staff would therefore like to offer the following suggestions for you and your respective community’s consideration as to whether any of them might be a useful way to continue to involve the community in this work:

•  Convene a community-based group to provide a list suggestions of other event and organizational policies that the ICANN Board should look at in considering improved or new policies, on the understanding that appropriate subject matter experts will be consulted in drafting a final policy;
•  Convene a community-based group to provide input to the ICANN Board with respect to any potential changes or additions that the Board may wish to recommend to the community as a result of further Board discussions and expert consultations on the topic; and
•  Do not convene a formal group, but leave it to each community (SO/AC/SG/Constituency/RALO) and individual participants to provide suggestions to, and comment on possible recommendations from, the Board as a result of further Board discussions and expert consultations on the topic.

Thank you all for your input and for helping us ensure that the ICANN community remains involved in work on this important topic.

Best regards,

David



_______________________________________________
NCUC-EC mailing list
NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org<mailto:NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org>
http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec




--
Farzaneh

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20160420/c2a4c775/attachment.html>