[NCUC-EC] civil society in ICANN - description

[João Carlos Rebello Caribé]

Rafik and other EC members, I reiterate my candidacy as representative of the NCUC to this CS project, had already come into contact with Adam, soon after the meeting of Dublin, offering to join the project team. I believe I have strong experience on this issue to do a good job.

I suggest a simple task to solve this input:

We need to map the main characteristic of any of this: At-Large, NPOC and NCUC (GROUPS)

What are the main similarities and differences of these GROUPS on:
     1) Participation  at ICANN ecosystem. 
     2) Engagement needs (E.G. NCUC accept individuals, At-Large just NGOs, etc)

This map would support to answer simple questions of potential candidates, e.g. 
     How you plan to participate in ICANN? 
      a) Building polices of gTLD, IP and other GNSO ISSUES >> GNSO

     On GNSO what are your focus in human rights? Operational procedures or  Human rights at all ? >> NPOC or NCUC 

We can work better mapping the similarities and differences of these GROUPS.

At-Large does a great job on this issues, their slides and folders are very easy and instructive for newcomers.

Finally we need to improve our NCUC communication strategy, will send suggestions early on January.

Happy New year for all!

Joao Carlos Caribe



Em 28/12/2015, às 12:36, Rafik Dammak escreveu:

> Hi there,
> 
> this was sent by Adam and he is asking for input here.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Rafik
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Adam Peake <adam.peake at icann.org>
> Date: 2015-12-24 1:50 GMT+09:00
> Subject: civil society in ICANN - description
> To: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>, Tapani Tarvainen <tapani.tarvainen at effi.org>, "Rudi Vansnick (NPOC)" <rudi.vansnick at npoc.org>, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>
> Cc: Heidi Ullrich <Heidi.Ullrich at icann.org>
> 
> 
> Dear Alan, Rafik, Rudi, Tapani:
> 
> You have probably heard me say that one of the things we want the CS strategy to address is a problem many newcomers mention: that they are unsure about which group is their natural home in ICANN.  We hear comments from Fellows and NextGen participants at the end of ICANN meetings saying they don't know whether they should be joining At-Large, NCUC or NPOC. And it can be quite difficult to persuade an audience at a general outreach event of the differences.  
> 
> I hope we can clarify the distinctions between your different missions.  
> 
> We are working on some new slides.  XPLANE can be effective at capturing this sort of thing.  
> 
> I would also like your help with some new written material.  I've collated text from various community documents describing CS in ICANN. You can find this attached.  Editorial has been minimal, most should be text already agreed by the community. Perhaps in the New Year we could start refining and simplifying this, with the goal of finalizing while together in Marrakech. 
> 
> A first version of the XPLANE graphics will be available before Marrakech, but they can also be finalized when we meet. Could you share this document and email with whoever in your communities you think may be interested in helping.
> 
> Warm regards and best wishes,
> 
> Adam
> 
> 
> <CS in ICANN outline.docx>_______________________________________________
> NCUC-EC mailing list
> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec

--
João Carlos R. Caribé
Consultor 
Skype joaocaribe
(021) 9 8761 1967

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20151228/b3eae088/attachment.html>