[NCUC-EC] EC Approval Processes

[William Drake]

Hi

Ten days having passed and having heard in the affirmative from Bill, Peter, Grace and Roy, in accordance with the bylaws I will take this as consensus and hence notify Sandra that we select Hanane for the LTP and notify Janice that we select Jia He for IGF.

There is now some confusion as to whether Stefi’s travel slot for Dublin can be reallocated, staff are being very unclear as to whether there’s support for both incoming and outgoing Councilors. If not then she keeps the NCUC slot and we can’t give it to someone else.  Will let you know.

Bill

> On Aug 25, 2015, at 5:37 PM, Balleste, Roy <rballeste at stu.edu> wrote:
> 
> To make sure:
>  
> I agree giving the LTP to Hanane, and the IGF slot to Jia.
>  
>  
> From: ncuc-ec-bounces at lists.ncuc.org <mailto:ncuc-ec-bounces at lists.ncuc.org> [mailto:ncuc-ec-bounces at lists.ncuc.org <mailto:ncuc-ec-bounces at lists.ncuc.org>] On Behalf Of Balleste, Roy
> Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2015 11:25 AM
> To: Grace Githaiga; William Drake; Exec. Comm
> Subject: Re: [NCUC-EC] EC Approval Processes
>  
> Also agree Bill.  Sorry for the delay.
>  
> Roy Balleste
> Director, Summer in Spain Program
> Professor of Law
> Law Library Director
> St. Thomas University Law Library
> 16401 NW 37th Avenue
> Miami Gardens, FL 33054
> 305-623-2341
> http://royballeste.org/ <http://royballeste.org/>
>  
> From: ncuc-ec-bounces at lists.ncuc.org <mailto:ncuc-ec-bounces at lists.ncuc.org> [mailto:ncuc-ec-bounces at lists.ncuc.org <mailto:ncuc-ec-bounces at lists.ncuc.org>] On Behalf Of Grace Githaiga
> Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2015 11:11 AM
> To: William Drake; Exec. Comm
> Subject: Re: [NCUC-EC] EC Approval Processes
>  
> I agree Bill. Thursday it is. 
> 
> From: william.drake at uzh.ch <mailto:william.drake at uzh.ch>
> Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 14:46:56 +0200
> To: ncuc-ec at lists.ncuc.org <mailto:ncuc-ec at lists.ncuc.org>
> Subject: Re: [NCUC-EC] EC Approval Processes
> 
> Hi
>  
> On Aug 25, 2015, at 9:13 AM, William Drake <william.drake at uzh.ch <mailto:william.drake at uzh.ch>> wrote:
>  
> Would be helpful to hear from Joao, Roy and Stefi. 
>  
> Since I’m going through the bylaws to prepare suggestions to the Bylaws Team (on which I’d think all EC members should be active participants), I remind you of the following:
>  
> 3. Voting on the EC on the matters listed in section IV.F below. All EC votes called by the Chair must be responded to in ten days. Regional representatives who fail to vote within that time limit four times in a row are considered to have resigned their office as per VII.B.2 below
>  
> 9. Whenever EC votes are required by the charter but inaction by other members of the EC prevents tasks and duties required by the charter to be executed, the Chair is empowered to act to further the interests of the constituency.
>  
> I first wrote to you all on 17 August.  Per usual I didn’t formally call it a “vote" but clearly members were asked to express preferences with an eye toward getting consensus or failing that a majority decision. So on Thursday 27 August I will “call it” on the outstanding issues based on the majority sentiment expressed in whatever responses I’ve received.
>  
> Bill
> 
> _______________________________________________ NCUC-EC mailing list NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org <mailto:NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec <http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec>_______________________________________________
> NCUC-EC mailing list
> NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org <mailto:NCUC-EC at lists.ncuc.org>
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec <http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20150827/0e106966/attachment.html>