[NCUC-EC] Ballots
Edward Morris
egmorris100 at gmail.com
Sat Nov 16 21:26:48 CET 2013
Problem solved.
Thanks Tapani, thanks Mary.
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 8:07 PM, Tapani Tarvainen <
ncuc at tapani.tarvainen.info> wrote:
> I already got a message from Mary about suggested
> replacement as Franklin rep.
>
> Tapani
>
> On Nov 16 16:52, Carlos A. Afonso (ca at cafonso.ca) wrote:
>
> > Mary will help us to solve this riddle, I assume.
> >
> > sent from a dumbphone
> >
> > > On 16/11/2013, at 15:57, Edward Morris <egmorris100 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Bill, rest assured I didn't identify who I was or where I was from.
> I was just got the name of the person now in charge of the Center,
> determined she was gone for the weekend and reported back to everyone. My
> assumption is the membership goes with the institution and not the
> individual. I was trying to be helpful but certainly would not have done
> anything affirmative without the consent of all involved. I just didn't
> like the idea of dropping an institutional member because our contact there
> is gone.
> > >
> > >
> > >> On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 6:49 PM, William Drake <wjdrake at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >> FWIW she was shocked and taken aback that the school had been called.
> As I said, she's way out of there.
> > >>
> > >> BD
> > >>
> > >>> On Nov 16, 2013, at 9:20 AM, Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu>
> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Probably best to ask Mary – cold-calling an institution and asking
> them whether they want to remain a member of NCUC (what’s that?) sounds
> like a way to waste a lot of time on both ends of the call. Mary can tell
> us who to contact and advise on the possibility of whether they will
> continue or not
> > >>>
> > >>> From: ncuc-ec-bounces at lists.ncuc.org [mailto:
> ncuc-ec-bounces at lists.ncuc.org] On Behalf Of Edward Morris
> > >>> Sent: Friday, November 15, 2013 3:19 PM
> > >>> To: Tapani Tarvainen; NCUC EC
> > >>> Subject: Re: [NCUC-EC] Ballots
> > >>>
> > >>> Actually, would anyone object to me calling them and seeing if
> anybody wants to maintain/ know anything about the membership?
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Tapani Tarvainen <
> tapani.tarvainen at effi.org> wrote:
> > >>> On Nov 15 17:05, William Drake (wjdrake at gmail.com) wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> > Actually, while one doesn’t like to lose org members, I think
> > >>> > realistically it might be advisable to drop them.
> > >>>
> > >>> Incidentally, our bylaws don't seem to provide for that...
> > >>>
> > >>> > See what she recommends, but she's way out of there, and it didn’t
> > >>> > sound like there’s anyone left to support a continuing affiliation
> > >>> > (not to mention that it’s sort of for profit…).
> > >>>
> > >>> OK. If she replies I'll report back here,
> > >>> but for now I'll set their rep as "unknown" and mark
> > >>> them as inactive (which will drop them from the ballot, too).
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> Tapani Tarvainen
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-ec mailing list
> Ncuc-ec at lists.ncuc.org
> http://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-ec
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20131116/2eb6083e/attachment.html>
More information about the NCUC-EC
mailing list