[NCUC-EC] [PC-NCSG] NCSG Meetings Plan for ICANN #47 in Durban

[William Drake]

Hi Folks

I can't write to NCSG EC, which was copied on the original (someone could forward please?) but I can write to NCUC EC, so copied here.

Since the constituency-level stuff is slighter and easier, I'm pretty much ready to send out an integrated listing of NCUC activities, but with one big caveat—the SG level stuff UC people should be encouraged to participate in seems to be in varying states of organization.  Shall we try to have a little focused conversation to nail stuff down for announcement?  After all we arrive at the Hilton in a week.

On Jul 2, 2013, at 9:25 PM, Robin Gross <robin at ipjustice.org> wrote:

> 
> Link to NCSG Meetings in Durban Planning Document:
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmHFgvYjF_e4dEN6SHM2U2VZalQ4MXMzNWtneWJrWnc&usp=sharing

This is really useful and someday may I should do the same.  For now, extracting the action points:

--------

Sunday

NCSG Policy Cmte 16-18:00

No chair named.  Can I propose David?

Possible Discussion Topics:	
Prep. for Thursday's G-Council Mtg
Prep. for NCSG w/Board Mtg on Tuesday
Directory Services
*If there's the intention to propose a PDP re: the recon, that that would seem like something that might eat much of the hour.

*Any other pressing stuff?  Otherwise I suspect we'll need less than 2hrs.


18:15 NCSG Cocktails with ICANN Board of Directors

One would guess some of them might ask what our next steps on Recon are.  Do we just wing it or want a messaging plan? Anything else we'll like to stick in their eares?
	

Tuesday

NCSG meeting, 13:30-15:30

Avri chair

Possible Discussion Topics:	
Update from constituencies on morning meeting
Prep. for NCSG w/Board Mtg on Tuesday	
Q: This seems a bit thin for two hours?  And item 2's already been covered in the PC. Could add NomCom letter. Anything else?  Or seems a short meeting


15:30-16:30 Discussion with Board

Avri again

Possible Discussion Topics:	
the question ICANN's committment to the bottom-up community-led model for Internet governance	
Inclusive outreach strategy / scaling participation in ICANN	
GNSO Review / Restructuring	
policy movements toward censorship (control of Internet content via DNS)	
These seem ok although one can easily imagine the guarded answers we'll be getting.  Is there an intent to push the Recons stuff specifically?  Do we need a division of labor by topic or just leave it all in Avri's lap to introduce and frame each piece?


1830-19:30 CSG Drink

Any agenda items to push or just schmooze?  Do we either want to bother with why no House meeting questions?


Thursday

Public Forum

Possible interventions:	

the question ICANN's committment to the bottom-up community-led model for Internet governance	
Inclusive outreach strategy / scaling participation in ICANN	
Q: I'd think a statement with ALAC on Friday would fit here. Anything else?


Some Unidentified Time

Discussion with At-Large

co-chair WK

Process of adoption of TM+50 policy
Request for return of Friday meetings during ICANN week
Possible common policy goals for new gtlds
Policy v Implementation
Joint Statement Delivered in Thursday's Public Forum

Q: some more focused and action-oriented than others.  Olivier tends to prefer actionable items to let's chat items.  Should we press them on whether they'd support whatever we're doing on Recon?  Could some Councilors lead on that discussion item?



	
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-ec/attachments/20130705/f40ed597/attachment.html>