<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=windows-1252"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">Hi Folks<div><br></div><div>I can't write to NCSG EC, which was copied on the original (someone could forward please?) but I can write to NCUC EC, so copied here.</div><div><br></div><div>Since the constituency-level stuff is slighter and easier, I'm pretty much ready to send out an integrated listing of NCUC activities, but with one big caveat—the SG level stuff UC people should be encouraged to participate in seems to be in varying states of organization. Shall we try to have a little focused conversation to nail stuff down for announcement? After all we arrive at the Hilton in a week.</div><div><br><div><div>On Jul 2, 2013, at 9:25 PM, Robin Gross <<a href="mailto:robin@ipjustice.org">robin@ipjustice.org</a>> wrote:</div><br><blockquote type="cite"><br>Link to NCSG Meetings in Durban Planning Document:<br> <a href="https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmHFgvYjF_e4dEN6SHM2U2VZalQ4MXMzNWtneWJrWnc&usp=sharing">https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmHFgvYjF_e4dEN6SHM2U2VZalQ4MXMzNWtneWJrWnc&usp=sharing</a><br></blockquote></div><br></div><div>This is really useful and someday may I should do the same. For now, extracting the action points:</div><div><br></div><div>--------</div><div><br></div><div><div><b><i>Sunday</i></b></div><div><b><br></b></div><div><b>NCSG Policy Cmte 16-18:00</b></div><div><br></div><div>No chair named. Can I propose David?</div><div><br></div><div>Possible Discussion Topics:<span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span></div><div><ol><li>Prep. for Thursday's G-Council Mtg</li><li>Prep. for NCSG w/Board Mtg on Tuesday</li><li>Directory Services</li></ol></div><div>*If there's the intention to propose a PDP re: the recon, that that would seem like something that might eat much of the hour.</div><div><br></div><div>*Any other pressing stuff? Otherwise I suspect we'll need less than 2hrs.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><b>18:15 NCSG Cocktails with ICANN Board of Directors</b></div><div><br></div><div>One would guess some of them might ask what our next steps on Recon are. Do we just wing it or want a messaging plan? Anything else we'll like to stick in their eares?</div><div><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span></div></div><div><br></div><div><i><b>Tuesday</b></i></div><div><i><b><br></b></i></div><div><i><b>NCSG meeting, 13:30-15:30</b></i></div><div><br></div><div>Avri chair</div><div><br></div><div>Possible Discussion Topics:<span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space: pre; "> </span></div><div><ol><li>Update from constituencies on morning meeting</li><li>Prep. for NCSG w/Board Mtg on Tuesday<span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space: pre; "> </span></li></ol></div><div>Q: This seems a bit thin for two hours? And item 2's already been covered in the PC. Could add NomCom letter. Anything else? Or seems a short meeting</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><b>15:30-16:30 Discussion with Board</b></div><div><br></div><div>Avri again</div><div><br></div><div>Possible Discussion Topics:<span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space: pre; "> </span></div><div><ol><li>the question ICANN's committment to the bottom-up community-led model for Internet governance<span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space: pre; "> </span></li><li>Inclusive outreach strategy / scaling participation in ICANN<span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space: pre; "> </span></li><li>GNSO Review / Restructuring<span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space: pre; "> </span></li><li>policy movements toward censorship (control of Internet content via DNS)<span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space: pre; "> </span></li></ol></div><div>These seem ok although one can easily imagine the guarded answers we'll be getting. Is there an intent to push the Recons stuff specifically? Do we need a division of labor by topic or just leave it all in Avri's lap to introduce and frame each piece?</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><b>1830-19:30 CSG Drink</b></div><div><br></div><div>Any agenda items to push or just schmooze? Do we either want to bother with why no House meeting questions?</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><b><i>Thursday</i></b></div><div><br></div><div><b>Public Forum</b></div><div><br></div><div>Possible interventions:<span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space: pre; "> </span></div><div><br></div><div><ol><li>the question ICANN's committment to the bottom-up community-led model for Internet governance<span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space: pre; "> </span></li><li>Inclusive outreach strategy / scaling participation in ICANN<span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space: pre; "> </span></li></ol><div>Q: I'd think a statement with ALAC on Friday would fit here. Anything else?</div></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><b><i>Some Unidentified Time</i></b></div><div><br></div><div>Discussion with At-Large</div><div><br></div><div>co-chair WK</div><div><br>Process of adoption of TM+50 policy<br>Request for return of Friday meetings during ICANN week<br>Possible common policy goals for new gtlds<br>Policy v Implementation<br>Joint Statement Delivered in Thursday's Public Forum<br><br>Q: some more focused and action-oriented than others. Olivier tends to prefer actionable items to let's chat items. Should we press them on whether they'd support whatever we're doing on Recon? Could some Councilors lead on that discussion item?<br><br><br><br><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span></div></body></html>