[Ec-ncuc] Mailing list action items

[David Cake]

On 13/02/2013, at 10:44 PM, William Drake <william.drake at UZH.CH> wrote:

> Hi
> 
> On Feb 13, 2013, at 3:12 PM, Tapani Tarvainen <ncuc at TAPANI.TARVAINEN.INFO> wrote:
> 
>> On Feb 10 10:52, William Drake (william.drake at uzh.ch) wrote:
>> 
>>> I prefer Discuss [...] I will roll with whatever the consensus
>>> among elected EC members is.
>> 
>> Looks like we've got three supporting ncuc-discuss, including the
>> chair, with three abstentions. Close enough to consensus for me,
>> but I'll leave that up to you.
> 
> Amidst all the mail flying on different topics in different spaces I've lost track of who has or hasn't replied.  However, I wouldn't consider a non-reply as an abstention (!?).  If that were the standard, abstention would probably be the majority position on most issues in most collaborative spaces I know, and not just within NCUC, NCSG, ICANN, civil society, etc etc.  This would hardly constitute a raving endorsement of anything.

	I agree with Bill's wisdom. My absence of discussion on the list naming issues should be taken as tacit agreement with whatever people more focussed on it decide. 

	Cheers
		David