[Ec-ncuc] Travel funding

[Tapani Tarvainen]

On Dec 18 15:00, William Drake (william.drake at uzh.ch) wrote:

> As of the last meeting, there are 3 travel slots per constituency.

OK. Not all that many, then.

> Bottom line, normally one would think that there should be
> preference for people who have actually committed the time and
> energy to do stuff

Good. I like that, as a general principle.

On Dec 18 22:20, David Cake (dave at difference.com.au) wrote:

>	Yes, as Bill says this idea of actually having guaranteed
> travel slots is such a recent luxury (first applied in Toronto) that
> we haven't actually worked out how to deal with it yet.

I see.

> 	And NCUC has some money of its own, which the EC may decide to
> use for travel funding (previously, this was most of what NCUC funds
> were used for).

How many people per meeting have generally been funded that way?

> Now that NCUC has travel slots to allocate, and has to consider
> funding the policy conferences etc, the EC may or may not decide
> that travel is the best use of funds.

How much money does NCUC have? Do we have a budget somewhere?

-- 
Tapani Tarvainen