[NCUC-DISCUSS] IGP comment on WSIS+20
Rafik Dammak
rafik.dammak at gmail.com
Tue Jul 22 13:28:45 CEST 2025
Hi Milton,
There was no objection in NCSG Policy Committee and we can support as NCSG
this statement.
Best,
Rafik
On Tue, Jul 15, 2025, 23:27 Mueller, Milton L <milton at gatech.edu> wrote:
> We would be interested in getting the feedback of NCUC/NCSG members on
> these comments. If there is a lot of agreement, possibly an endorsement of
> these comments by the Executive Committee. We call for making the IGF
> permanent, more independence of IGF from the UN, and more influence of the
> bottom up NRIGFs in formulating the agenda. We also criticize the Elements
> paper's approach to human rights, for prioritizing state control over
> individual empowerment. We also call for more emphasis on the development
> of the digital economy.
>
> Regards,
>
> Dr. Milton L Mueller
>
> Georgia Institute of Technology
>
> School of Public Policy
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Mueller, Milton L <milton at gatech.edu>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 15, 2025 10:14 AM
> *To:* NCSG-Discuss <ncsg-discuss at listserv.syr.edu>
> *Cc:* Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org <ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
> *Subject:* IGP comment on WSIS+20
>
> Dear colleagues
>
> The Internet Governance Project has filed comments in the WSIS+20
> stakeholder consultations. Here is the position we took:
>
>
> https://www.internetgovernance.org/2025/07/15/wsis20-stakeholder-consultations-igps-input/
>
>
> <https://www.internetgovernance.org/2025/07/15/wsis20-stakeholder-consultations-igps-input/>
> WSIS+20 Stakeholder Consultations: IGP’s Input - Internet Governance
> Project
> <https://www.internetgovernance.org/2025/07/15/wsis20-stakeholder-consultations-igps-input/>
> What should become of the World Summit on the Information Society? The
> WSIS+20 review process, culminating at the UN General Assembly in December
> 2025, will assess progress made since the original WSIS and chart a course
> for its future. The UN is preparing a “Zero draft” and asked for comments
> from the public. This is […]
> www.internetgovernance.org
>
>
> Dr. Milton L Mueller
>
> Georgia Institute of Technology
>
> School of Public Policy
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Mueller, Milton L <milton at gatech.edu>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 15, 2025 10:14 AM
> *To:* NCSG-Discuss <ncsg-discuss at listserv.syr.edu>
> *Cc:* Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org <ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org>
> *Subject:* IGP comment on WSIS+20
>
> Dear colleagues
>
> The Internet Governance Project has filed comments in the WSIS+20
> stakeholder consultations. Here is the position we took:
>
>
> https://www.internetgovernance.org/2025/07/15/wsis20-stakeholder-consultations-igps-input/
>
>
> <https://www.internetgovernance.org/2025/07/15/wsis20-stakeholder-consultations-igps-input/>
> WSIS+20 Stakeholder Consultations: IGP’s Input - Internet Governance
> Project
> <https://www.internetgovernance.org/2025/07/15/wsis20-stakeholder-consultations-igps-input/>
> What should become of the World Summit on the Information Society? The
> WSIS+20 review process, culminating at the UN General Assembly in December
> 2025, will assess progress made since the original WSIS and chart a course
> for its future. The UN is preparing a “Zero draft” and asked for comments
> from the public. This is […]
> www.internetgovernance.org
>
>
> Dr. Milton L Mueller
>
> Georgia Institute of Technology
>
> School of Public Policy
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20250722/d22fbf3e/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Outlook-iqc0zftx
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 6749 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20250722/d22fbf3e/attachment.jpe>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Outlook-eru1hbbk
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 6749 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20250722/d22fbf3e/attachment-0001.jpe>
More information about the Ncuc-discuss
mailing list