[NCUC-DISCUSS] Fwd: [Gnso-coordination] Continuous improvement principles re GNSO & Council
Benjamin Akinmoyeje
benakin at gmail.com
Wed Oct 30 07:35:01 CET 2024
Dear NCUC and NCSG members,
Good day, your week is going great so far.
Here is an update about the state of the 5 ICANN Principles of Continuous
Improvement and the current version (changes applied to the 4th principle
as requested). I believe we can go with these; what do you think?
ICANN Principles of Continuous Improvement
1. The SO, AC, or NomCom is fulfilling its purpose.
2. The structures of SO, AC, or NomCom are effective.
3. The operations of SO, AC, or NomCom are efficient.
4. *The SO, AC, or NomCom adheres to ICANN’s mission and Bylaws with
respect to its stakeholders and substructures (where applicable),and to the
wider ICANN community in benefit of the global Internet population*
5. The SO, AC, or NomCom collaborates to further the mission of ICANN and
the effectiveness of the ICANN bottom-up multistakeholder model.
Looking forward to hearing from you.
Kind regards,
Benjamin
On Tue, Oct 8, 2024 at 5:57 PM Johan Helsingius <
00001963cc94b85a-dmarc-request at listserv.syr.edu> wrote:
> Oh, and to complicate things even more, seems ALAC is represented
> by 6 reps - one for ALAC itself and one each for AFRALO, APRALO,
> EURALO, LACRALO and NARALO (with alternates).
>
> We could also have had a NCSG rep in addition to NCUC and
> NPOC reps.
>
> Julf
>
>
> On 10/8/24 17:51, Johan Helsingius wrote:
> > Hi Pedro,
> >
> > This is not the Council Committee for Overseeing and Implementing
> > Continuous Improvement (CCOICI) but the Continuous Improvement
> > Program Community Coordination Group (CIP-CCG).
> >
> > Yes, it is confusing!
> >
> > Nominally the CIP-CCG (as well as the CCOICI) is put together based on
> > on constituencies, so it has separate NCUC (Benjamin, with Liubomir as
> > alternate) and NPOC (Caleb with Wisdom as alternate) representatives,
> > but just as with council, we should treat them as representing
> > a common NCSG view.
> >
> > Julf
> >
> > On 10/8/24 14:05, Pedro de Perdigão Lana wrote:
> >> Hi Julf,
> >>
> >> Manju is the chair, Juan Rojas is there as NPOC, and Wisdom is there as
> >> NCUC.
> >>
> >> Cordially,
> >>
> >> *Pedro de Perdigão Lana*
> >> Lawyer <https://www.nic.br/>, GEDAI/UFPR <https://www.gedai.com.br/>
> >> Researcher
> >> PhD Candidate (UFPR), LLM in Business Law (UCoimbra)
> >> Coordination/Board/EC @ISOC BR <https://isoc.org.br/>,NCUC
> >> <https://www.ncuc.org> & NCSG
> >> <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsononcomstake/Home>(ICANN),
> >> YouthLACIGF <https://youthlacigf.lat/>,IODA <https://ioda.org.br/> and
> >> CC Brasil <https://br.creativecommons.net/>
> >> This message is restricted to the sender and recipient(s). If received
> >> by mistake, please reply informing it.
> >>
> >>
> >> Em ter., 8 de out. de 2024 às 04:36, Johan Helsingius
> >> <00001963cc94b85a-dmarc-request at listserv.syr.edu
> >> <mailto:00001963cc94b85a-dmarc-request at listserv.syr.edu>> escreveu:
> >>
> >> Hi Benjamin,
> >>
> >> Thanks for posting this!
> >>
> >> I am copying the NCSG list as well, as this is something we
> probably
> >> should coordinate on a NCSG level. Can you remind me who our other
> >> representatives on this group are?
> >>
> >> Julf
> >>
> >>
> >> On 10/7/24 08:44, Benjamin Akinmoyeje wrote:
> >> > Dear NCUC members,
> >> > I would like input in deciding whether all these principles are
> >> > appropriate. This request had been sent out previously however
> the
> >> > emphasis is on number 4.
> >> >
> >> > This is the question the GNSO participants in the
> >> > ContinuousImprovement Program Community Coordination Group
> (CIP-CCG)
> >> > like to know. You can know more about
> >> *ContinuousImprovement** Program
> >> > Community Coordination Group* (CIP-CCG) can be found on this
> link
> >> > <https://community.icann.org/display/CIP
> >> <https://community.icann.org/display/CIP>> below
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > 1.
> >> >
> >> > The SO, AC, or NomCom is fulfilling its purpose.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > 2.
> >> >
> >> > The structures of SO, AC, or NomCom are effective.
> >> >
> >> > 3.
> >> >
> >> > The operations of SO, AC, or NomCom are efficient.
> >> >
> >> > 4.
> >> >
> >> > The SO, AC, or NomCom is accountable internally to its
> >> stakeholders
> >> > and substructures (where applicable), and externally to the
> wider
> >> > ICANN community in benefit of the global Internet
> population.
> >> >
> >> > 5.
> >> >
> >> > The SO, AC, or NomCom collaborates to further the mission of
> >> ICANN.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> >> > From: *Chris Disspain via Gnso-coordination*
> >> > <gnso-coordination at icann.org <mailto:
> gnso-coordination at icann.org>
> >> <mailto:gnso-coordination at icann.org
> >> <mailto:gnso-coordination at icann.org>>>
> >> > Date: Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 11:14 AM
> >> > Subject: [Gnso-coordination] Continuous improvement principles
> re
> >> GNSO &
> >> > Council
> >> > To: <gnso-coordination at icann.org
> >> <mailto:gnso-coordination at icann.org>
> >> <mailto:gnso-coordination at icann.org
> >> <mailto:gnso-coordination at icann.org>>>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Hello All,
> >> >
> >> > As previously discussed, our job as the GNSO SG reps to the
> >> Continuous
> >> > Improvement CCG is to agree a set of principles that will apply
> >> to the
> >> > GNSO and GNSO Council’s continuous improvement efforts.
> >> >
> >> > The current principles from the draft CIP CCG document are
> below.
> >> > Bearing in mind that the GNSO CCOICI will be the group that
> >> develops the
> >> > criteria that sit under the principles and that, whilst not
> >> essential,
> >> > it would be optimal if the overarching principles were the same
> >> for all
> >> > SOs and ACs, can we live with these and if not, what amendments
> >> would we
> >> > like to see?
> >> >
> >> > It would be great to hear back from everyone by next Tuesday 1st
> >> October
> >> > so we can feed our comments into the next CIP meeting on 2nd.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > 1.
> >> >
> >> > The SO, AC, or NomCom is fulfilling its purpose.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > 2.
> >> >
> >> > The structures of SO, AC, or NomCom are effective.
> >> >
> >> > 3.
> >> >
> >> > The operations of SO, AC, or NomCom are efficient.
> >> >
> >> > 4.
> >> >
> >> > The SO, AC, or NomCom is accountable internally to its
> >> stakeholders
> >> > and substructures (where applicable), and externally to the
> wider
> >> > ICANN community in benefit of the global Internet
> population.
> >> >
> >> > 5.
> >> >
> >> > The SO, AC, or NomCom collaborates to further the mission of
> >> ICANN.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Cheers,
> >> > Chris
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > Gnso-coordination mailing list -- gnso-coordination at icann.org
> >> <mailto:gnso-coordination at icann.org>
> >> > <mailto:gnso-coordination at icann.org
> >> <mailto:gnso-coordination at icann.org>>
> >> > To unsubscribe send an email to
> gnso-coordination-leave at icann.org
> >> <mailto:gnso-coordination-leave at icann.org>
> >> > <mailto:gnso-coordination-leave at icann.org
> >> <mailto:gnso-coordination-leave at icann.org>>
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> >> > Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org <mailto:Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> >
> >> > https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
> >> <https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss>
> >>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20241030/4257fd71/attachment.htm>
More information about the Ncuc-discuss
mailing list