[NCUC-DISCUSS] Fwd: [Gnso-coordination] Continuous improvement principles re GNSO & Council

[Johan Helsingius]

Hi Benjamin,

Thanks for posting this!

I am copying the NCSG list as well, as this is something we probably
should coordinate on a NCSG level. Can you remind me who our other
representatives on this group are?

	Julf


On 10/7/24 08:44, Benjamin Akinmoyeje wrote:
> Dear NCUC members,
> I would like input in deciding whether all these principles are 
> appropriate. This request had been sent out previously however the 
> emphasis is on number 4.
> 
> This is the question the GNSO participants in the 
> ContinuousImprovement Program Community Coordination Group (CIP-CCG) 
> like to know. You can know more about *ContinuousImprovement** Program 
> Community Coordination Group* (CIP-CCG) can be found on this link 
> <https://community.icann.org/display/CIP> below
> 
> 
> 
>  1.
> 
>     The SO, AC, or NomCom is fulfilling its purpose.
> 
> 
>  2.
> 
>     The structures of SO, AC, or NomCom are effective.
> 
>  3.
> 
>     The operations of SO, AC, or NomCom are efficient.
> 
>  4.
> 
>     The SO, AC, or NomCom is accountable internally to its stakeholders
>     and substructures (where applicable), and externally to the wider
>     ICANN community in benefit of the global Internet population.
> 
>  5.
> 
>     The SO, AC, or NomCom collaborates to further the mission of ICANN.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: *Chris Disspain via Gnso-coordination* 
> <gnso-coordination at icann.org <mailto:gnso-coordination at icann.org>>
> Date: Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 11:14 AM
> Subject: [Gnso-coordination] Continuous improvement principles re GNSO & 
> Council
> To: <gnso-coordination at icann.org <mailto:gnso-coordination at icann.org>>
> 
> 
> Hello All,
> 
> As previously discussed, our job as the GNSO SG reps to the Continuous 
> Improvement CCG is to agree a set of principles that will apply to the 
> GNSO and GNSO Council’s continuous improvement efforts.
> 
> The current principles from the draft CIP CCG document are below. 
> Bearing in mind that the GNSO CCOICI will be the group that develops the 
> criteria that sit under the principles and that, whilst not essential, 
> it would be optimal if the overarching principles were the same for all 
> SOs and ACs, can we live with these and if not, what amendments would we 
> like to see?
> 
> It would be great to hear back from everyone by next Tuesday 1st October 
> so we can feed our comments into the next CIP meeting on 2nd.
> 
> 
>  1.
> 
>     The SO, AC, or NomCom is fulfilling its purpose.
> 
> 
>  2.
> 
>     The structures of SO, AC, or NomCom are effective.
> 
>  3.
> 
>     The operations of SO, AC, or NomCom are efficient.
> 
>  4.
> 
>     The SO, AC, or NomCom is accountable internally to its stakeholders
>     and substructures (where applicable), and externally to the wider
>     ICANN community in benefit of the global Internet population.
> 
>  5.
> 
>     The SO, AC, or NomCom collaborates to further the mission of ICANN.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> Chris
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-coordination mailing list -- gnso-coordination at icann.org 
> <mailto:gnso-coordination at icann.org>
> To unsubscribe send an email to gnso-coordination-leave at icann.org 
> <mailto:gnso-coordination-leave at icann.org>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss