[NCUC-DISCUSS] URGENT - Time sensitive What is your view on on the question of rebalancing the Nominating Committee (NomCom)
Benjamin Akinmoyeje
benakin at gmail.com
Fri Jun 30 21:20:17 CEST 2023
Dear NCUC members,
Thank you for your responses and I believe without a doubt that we are all
aligned on the view that Nomcom requires equal balancing of all
stakeholders.
My understanding is that as a constituency we should align with the NCSG
submission which concurs with our council's view.
I hope this is satisfactory to all NCUC members.
There was no contention, the NCUC has always been supportive of NPOC
getting representation in NomCom, we were just ensuring there was an
opportunity for everyone to have their opinion expressed.
Kind regards,
Benjamin
On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 7:54 PM Akinremi Peter Taiwo <compsoftnet at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Good to see views on how to rebalance nomcom.
>
> Would be good to see more seats for the Non commercial. However this needs
> to be stated in a diplomatic way as nomcom members are not representative
> of any stakeholder groups.
>
> The fight to get more seats is internal and would not get broaded support.
> And we must know who to approach to get the rebalancing sorted while NCUC,
> NCSG and NPOC align in their fight.
>
> If not for any other things, ICANN should ensure all stakeholder groups
> are well represented with equal representation to drive inclusiveness and
> values.
>
> Regards.
>
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 6:57 PM Benjamin Akinmoyeje <benakin at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Dear NCUC members,
>>
>> Good day and I hope your week is going well.
>> Thank you for participating in the NCUC Readout session. As discussed in
>> the meeting today, please share your response to these questions to gather
>> our community views.
>>
>> ICANN Board Chair Tripti Sinha is requesting feedback from your
>> respective community groups on the question of rebalancing the
>> Nominating Committee (NomCom) by **30 June 2023**. As noted in the
>> letter, the ICANN Board wishes to engage with the community to
>> understand the community’s views on this topic. The Board is specifically
>> seeking input on the following questions:
>>
>> 1. What does it mean to have a balanced NomCom at a point in time?
>> For example, what criteria would you apply to measure or assess whether the
>> NomCom is balanced? And further, how can one test whether or not the
>> NomCom is balanced?
>>
>> 2. Do you support the view that the current composition of the NomCom needs
>> to be rebalanced? Please explain why or why not.
>>
>> 3. How frequently does the balance need to be measured or assessed?
>>
>> 4. How do you suggest that the NomCom’s composition be rebalanced?
>>
>> 5. Who should conduct this work, and how should it be conducted?
>>
>> 6. How would your community group prioritize consideration of this issue
>> within your planning efforts?
>>
>> Additional background on the work to date on this topic, including by the
>> NomCom Review Implementation Working Group that
>> was set up to implement the outcomes of the Second NomCom Review (see
>> https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/correspondence
>>
>>
>> <https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/correspondence> for each of the
>> letters sent to all 21 SOAC leaders). In addition, on 25 May 2023, the
>> Chair of the Board’s Organizational Effectiveness Committee, Katrina
>> Sataki, and members of ICANN org’s Reviews Support & Accountability team
>> gave a presentation to the GNSO Council that covered the present
>> structure of NomCom, a brief history of the rebalancing matter and
>> forthcoming actions. As such, you may find the presentation
>> <
>> https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/policy/2023/presentation/presentation-gnso-council-
>> nomcom-rebalancing-revised-25may23-en.pdf> and
>> the recording
>> <
>> https://icann.zoom.us/rec/share/7pSQ37mSB5wGz8-msQS2PDpzhQ6VdJQISm2SYmWKwfFMWFM_Z6FdMsFiipNyIV-E.J55mm5SBjoZJS9d9?startTime=1684990882000
>> > (from
>> 00:14:10 - 00:31:38) helpful in discussing any planned feedback with
>> your members.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
>> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
>> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>>
>
>
> --
> Best regards
>
> *Taiwo Peter Akinremi*
> ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------- ------
> ------ ------- ------ ------
> *Policy Advisory | Data Governance and Privacy Consultant | Information
> Security & Cybersecurity | Certified Salesforce Administrator*
> *Phone*; +2348117714345, +2347063830177 *Skype*: akinremi.taiwo
> *Email:* compsoftnet at gmail.com, peterexecute at gmail.com
> ___________________________________________
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20230630/2b13a1c1/attachment.htm>
More information about the Ncuc-discuss
mailing list