[NCUC-DISCUSS] URGENT - Time sensitive What is your view on on the question of rebalancing the Nominating Committee (NomCom)

[Akinremi Peter Taiwo]

Good to see views on how to rebalance nomcom.

Would be good to see more seats for the Non commercial. However this needs
to be stated in a diplomatic way as nomcom members are not representative
of any stakeholder groups.

The fight to get more seats is internal and would not get broaded support.
And we must know who to approach to get the rebalancing sorted while NCUC,
NCSG and NPOC align in their fight.

If not for any other things, ICANN should ensure all stakeholder groups are
well represented with equal representation to drive inclusiveness and
values.

Regards.

On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 6:57 PM Benjamin Akinmoyeje <benakin at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Dear NCUC members,
>
> Good day and I hope your week is going well.
> Thank you for participating in the NCUC Readout session.  As discussed in
> the meeting today, please share  your response to these questions to gather
> our community views.
>
> ICANN Board Chair Tripti Sinha is  requesting feedback from your
> respective community groups on the question of rebalancing the Nominating
> Committee (NomCom) by **30 June 2023**. As noted in the letter, the ICANN
> Board wishes to engage with the community to understand the community’s
> views on this topic. The Board is specifically seeking input on the
> following questions:
>
> 1. What does it mean to have a balanced NomCom at a point in time?
> For example, what criteria would you apply to measure or assess whether the
> NomCom is balanced? And further, how can one test whether or not the
> NomCom is balanced?
>
> 2. Do you support the view that the current composition of the NomCom needs
> to be rebalanced? Please explain why or why not.
>
> 3. How frequently does the balance need to be measured or assessed?
>
> 4. How do you suggest that the NomCom’s composition be rebalanced?
>
> 5. Who should conduct this work, and how should it be conducted?
>
> 6. How would your community group prioritize consideration of this issue
> within your planning efforts?
>
> Additional background on the work to date on this topic, including by the
> NomCom Review Implementation Working Group that
> was set up to implement the outcomes of the Second NomCom Review (see
> https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/correspondence
>
>
> <https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/correspondence> for each of the
> letters sent to all 21 SOAC leaders). In addition, on 25 May 2023, the
> Chair of the Board’s Organizational Effectiveness Committee, Katrina
> Sataki, and members of ICANN org’s Reviews Support & Accountability team
> gave a presentation to the GNSO Council that covered the present
> structure of NomCom, a brief history of the rebalancing matter and
> forthcoming actions. As such, you may find the presentation
> <
> https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/policy/2023/presentation/presentation-gnso-council-
> nomcom-rebalancing-revised-25may23-en.pdf> and
> the recording
> <
> https://icann.zoom.us/rec/share/7pSQ37mSB5wGz8-msQS2PDpzhQ6VdJQISm2SYmWKwfFMWFM_Z6FdMsFiipNyIV-E.J55mm5SBjoZJS9d9?startTime=1684990882000
> > (from
> 00:14:10 - 00:31:38) helpful in discussing any planned feedback with
> your members.
> _______________________________________________
> Ncuc-discuss mailing list
> Ncuc-discuss at lists.ncuc.org
> https://lists.ncuc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ncuc-discuss
>


-- 
Best regards

*Taiwo Peter Akinremi*
------ ------ -------  ------ ------ -------  ------ ------ ------- ------
------ -------  ------ ------
*Policy Advisory | Data Governance and Privacy Consultant | Information
Security & Cybersecurity | Certified Salesforce Administrator*
*Phone*; +2348117714345, +2347063830177 *Skype*: akinremi.taiwo
*Email:* compsoftnet at gmail.com, peterexecute at gmail.com
___________________________________________
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/attachments/20230629/a3b63ffc/attachment.htm>